KEDUDUKAN ANAK PEREMPUAN DALAM PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN ADAT DITINJAU DARI HUKUM ISLAM

The Siru Village community is a community that is still thick with the habits carried out by the previous ancestors, especially in the distribution of inheritance. In the days of the ancestors, men were more important than women in the distribution of inheritance, as is the case in Siru Village today where men are more entitled to the inheritance left by their relatives and parents. This is very different from the inheritance law which is regulated in Islamic law. In Islamic law, men and women have the same rights in obtaining inheritance, only the difference lies in the amount of property obtained. Based on the background above, the researcher formulates several problems, namely first, what are the factors that girls do not become heirs, second, how is Islamic law reviewing the distribution of customary inheritance in Siru Village, and third, what is the impact on girls after division of inheritance.The method used in this research is a qualitative method with an empirical approach and case studies. Those involved in this research were traditional leaders in Siru Village, educational leaders, religious leaders, community leaders, and village officials. From this research it can be concluded that the people of Siru Village, make men as heirs due to several factors. The first factor is that the Siru Village community adheres to a patrilineal system that follows the father's lineage, the second is the history of ata peang (girls) and ata one (boys), and the third is the existence of belis or paca for boys before marrying children. person.Judging from the view of Islamic law this is very contradictory. This is because in Islamic law it has been regulated in detail about the distribution of inheritance, in which it has been explained that men and women have the same rights in the distribution of inheritance, namely as heirs.Keywords: Islamic Law, Customary Law, Customary Heritag

Land reform, inheritance rights and unintended consequences

No abstract available

Construct redundancy in process modelling grammars: Improving the explanatory power of ontological analysis

Conceptual modelling supports developers and users of information systems in areas of documentation, analysis or system redesign. The ongoing interest in the modelling of business processes has led to a variety of different grammars, raising the question of the quality of these grammars for modelling. An established way of evaluating the quality of a modelling grammar is by means of an ontological analysis, which can determine the extent to which grammars contain construct deficit, overload, excess or redundancy. While several studies have shown the relevance of most of these criteria, predictions about construct redundancy have yielded inconsistent results in the past, with some studies suggesting that redundancy may even be beneficial for modelling in practice. In this paper we seek to contribute to clarifying the concept of construct redundancy by introducing a revision to the ontological analysis method. Based on the concept of inheritance we propose an approach that distinguishes between specialized and distinct construct redundancy. We demonstrate the potential explanatory power of the revised method by reviewing and clarifying previous results found in the literature

Evaluation Criteria for Object-oriented Metrics

In this paper an evaluation model for object-oriented (OO) metrics is proposed. We have evaluated the existing evaluation criteria for OO metrics, and based on the observations, a model is proposed which tries to cover most of the features for the evaluation of OO metrics. The model is validated by applying it to existing OO metrics. In contrast to the other existing criteria, the proposed model is simple in implementation and includes the practical and important aspects of evaluation; hence it suitable to evaluate and validate any OO complexity metric

Dismantling Lamarckism: why descriptions of socio-economic evolution as Lamarckian are misleading

“The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com”. Copyright Springer.This paper addresses the widespread tendency to describe socio-economic evolution as Lamarckian. The difference between Lamarckian and Darwinian replication is clarified. It is shown that a phenotype-genotype distinction must first be established before we can identify Lamarckian transmission. To qualify as Lamarckian inheritance, acquired properties at the phenotypic level must be encoded in a genotype that is passed on to the next generation. Some possible social replicators (or genotypes) are identified, with a view to exploring possible distinctions between genotype and phenotype at the social level. It is concluded that the Lamarckian label does not readily transfer to socio-economic evolution, despite the fact that social genotypes (such as routines) may adapt within any given phenotype (such as an organisation). By contrast, no such problems exist with the description of socio-economic evolution as Darwinian.Peer reviewe