9,973 research outputs found

    Protocolos de enrutamiento anónimos para redes Ad-Hoc (2ª parte)

    Get PDF
    En estas diapositivas de la asignatura Diseño Avanzado de Redes del Máster en Investigación en Ingeniería de Sistemas y de la Computación se expone una versión simplificada del protocolo de enrutamiento anónimo SDAR (an efficient Secure Distributed Anonymous Routing protocol for mobile and wireless ad-hoc networks) para redes Ad-Hoc inalámbricas

    Development of Advanced Location Based Efficient Routing in MANETs

    Get PDF
    Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) use routing protocols that are anonymous and provides hiding of crucial node identities and routes, so that outside observers cannot trace the route and also the crucial nodes, in this way it provides better protection. There are many existing anonymous routing protocols which rely on either hop-by-hop encryption or redundant traffic. Both the methods used are highly costly and also they don't generate full anonymity protection to the nodes or routers and also the source and destination. As the cost is high while using this anonymity protection categories it creates problem in the resource constraints in MANETs especially in multimedia wireless applications high cost exacerbates the intrinsic resource constraint problem are seen in MANETs especially in wireless multimedia applications. To provide protection at low cost, an Advanced Location-based Efficient Routing in MANET (ALER).It dynamically partitions the network field into different zones and it randomly chooses nodes in zones as intermediate relay nodes, these relay nodes forms a non-traceable anonymous route, not only that the proposed protocol also helps in hiding the sender and the destination also very efficiently. It also has strategies to effectively counter intersection, timing attacks. In this routing technique it has tried to overcome the Sybil attack issues which were not solved by the routing technique. It has prevented the Sybil attack entirely by having forwarding nodes check source routes for loops

    Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Mesh Networks: A Survey

    Full text link
    This book chapter identifies various security threats in wireless mesh network (WMN). Keeping in mind the critical requirement of security and user privacy in WMNs, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of various possible attacks on different layers of the communication protocol stack for WMNs and their corresponding defense mechanisms. First, it identifies the security vulnerabilities in the physical, link, network, transport, application layers. Furthermore, various possible attacks on the key management protocols, user authentication and access control protocols, and user privacy preservation protocols are presented. After enumerating various possible attacks, the chapter provides a detailed discussion on various existing security mechanisms and protocols to defend against and wherever possible prevent the possible attacks. Comparative analyses are also presented on the security schemes with regards to the cryptographic schemes used, key management strategies deployed, use of any trusted third party, computation and communication overhead involved etc. The chapter then presents a brief discussion on various trust management approaches for WMNs since trust and reputation-based schemes are increasingly becoming popular for enforcing security in wireless networks. A number of open problems in security and privacy issues for WMNs are subsequently discussed before the chapter is finally concluded.Comment: 62 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables. This chapter is an extension of the author's previous submission in arXiv submission: arXiv:1102.1226. There are some text overlaps with the previous submissio

    Content-Centric Networking at Internet Scale through The Integration of Name Resolution and Routing

    Full text link
    We introduce CCN-RAMP (Routing to Anchors Matching Prefixes), a new approach to content-centric networking. CCN-RAMP offers all the advantages of the Named Data Networking (NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCNx) but eliminates the need to either use Pending Interest Tables (PIT) or lookup large Forwarding Information Bases (FIB) listing name prefixes in order to forward Interests. CCN-RAMP uses small forwarding tables listing anonymous sources of Interests and the locations of name prefixes. Such tables are immune to Interest-flooding attacks and are smaller than the FIBs used to list IP address ranges in the Internet. We show that no forwarding loops can occur with CCN-RAMP, and that Interests flow over the same routes that NDN and CCNx would maintain using large FIBs. The results of simulation experiments comparing NDN with CCN-RAMP based on ndnSIM show that CCN-RAMP requires forwarding state that is orders of magnitude smaller than what NDN requires, and attains even better performance

    Introducing Accountability to Anonymity Networks

    Full text link
    Many anonymous communication (AC) networks rely on routing traffic through proxy nodes to obfuscate the originator of the traffic. Without an accountability mechanism, exit proxy nodes risk sanctions by law enforcement if users commit illegal actions through the AC network. We present BackRef, a generic mechanism for AC networks that provides practical repudiation for the proxy nodes by tracing back the selected outbound traffic to the predecessor node (but not in the forward direction) through a cryptographically verifiable chain. It also provides an option for full (or partial) traceability back to the entry node or even to the corresponding user when all intermediate nodes are cooperating. Moreover, to maintain a good balance between anonymity and accountability, the protocol incorporates whitelist directories at exit proxy nodes. BackRef offers improved deployability over the related work, and introduces a novel concept of pseudonymous signatures that may be of independent interest. We exemplify the utility of BackRef by integrating it into the onion routing (OR) protocol, and examine its deployability by considering several system-level aspects. We also present the security definitions for the BackRef system (namely, anonymity, backward traceability, no forward traceability, and no false accusation) and conduct a formal security analysis of the OR protocol with BackRef using ProVerif, an automated cryptographic protocol verifier, establishing the aforementioned security properties against a strong adversarial model
    corecore