Dynamic Virtualized Deployment of Particle Physics Environments on a High Performance Computing Cluster

The NEMO High Performance Computing Cluster at the University of Freiburg has been made available to researchers of the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Users access the cluster from external machines connected to the World-wide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG). This paper describes how the full software environment of the WLCG is provided in a virtual machine image. The interplay between the schedulers for NEMO and for the external clusters is coordinated through the ROCED service. A cloud computing infrastructure is deployed at NEMO to orchestrate the simultaneous usage by bare metal and virtualized jobs. Through the setup, resources are provided to users in a transparent, automatized, and on-demand way. The performance of the virtualized environment has been evaluated for particle physics applications

Checkpointing as a Service in Heterogeneous Cloud Environments

A non-invasive, cloud-agnostic approach is demonstrated for extending existing cloud platforms to include checkpoint-restart capability. Most cloud platforms currently rely on each application to provide its own fault tolerance. A uniform mechanism within the cloud itself serves two purposes: (a) direct support for long-running jobs, which would otherwise require a custom fault-tolerant mechanism for each application; and (b) the administrative capability to manage an over-subscribed cloud by temporarily swapping out jobs when higher priority jobs arrive. An advantage of this uniform approach is that it also supports parallel and distributed computations, over both TCP and InfiniBand, thus allowing traditional HPC applications to take advantage of an existing cloud infrastructure. Additionally, an integrated health-monitoring mechanism detects when long-running jobs either fail or incur exceptionally low performance, perhaps due to resource starvation, and proactively suspends the job. The cloud-agnostic feature is demonstrated by applying the implementation to two very different cloud platforms: Snooze and OpenStack. The use of a cloud-agnostic architecture also enables, for the first time, migration of applications from one cloud platform to another.Comment: 20 pages, 11 figures, appears in CCGrid, 201

Multi-elastic Datacenters: Auto-scaled Virtual Clusters on Energy-Aware Physical Infrastructures

[EN] Computer clusters are widely used platforms to execute different computational workloads. Indeed, the advent of virtualization and Cloud computing has paved the way to deploy virtual elastic clusters on top of Cloud infrastructures, which are typically backed by physical computing clusters. In turn, the advances in Green computing have fostered the ability to dynamically power on the nodes of physical clusters as required. Therefore, this paper introduces an open-source framework to deploy elastic virtual clusters running on elastic physical clusters where the computing capabilities of the virtual clusters are dynamically changed to satisfy both the user application's computing requirements and to minimise the amount of energy consumed by the underlying physical cluster that supports an on-premises Cloud. For that, we integrate: i) an elasticity manager both at the infrastructure level (power management) and at the virtual infrastructure level (horizontal elasticity); ii) an automatic Virtual Machine (VM) consolidation agent that reduces the amount of powered on physical nodes using live migration and iii) a vertical elasticity manager to dynamically and transparently change the memory allocated to VMs, thus fostering enhanced consolidation. A case study based on real datasets executed on a production infrastructure is used to validate the proposed solution. The results show that a multi-elastic virtualized datacenter provides users with the ability to deploy customized scalable computing clusters while reducing its energy footprint.The results of this work have been partially supported by ATMOSPHERE (Adaptive, Trustworthy, Manageable, Orchestrated, Secure, Privacy-assuring Hybrid, Ecosystem for Resilient Cloud Computing), funded by the European Commission under the Cooperation Programme, Horizon 2020 grant agreement No 777154.Alfonso Laguna, CD.; Caballer Fernández, M.; Calatrava Arroyo, A.; Moltó, G.; Blanquer Espert, I. (2018). Multi-elastic Datacenters: Auto-scaled Virtual Clusters on Energy-Aware Physical Infrastructures. Journal of Grid Computing. 17(1):191-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-018-9449-zS191204171Buyya, R.: High Performance Cluster Computing: Architectures and Systems. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1999)de Alfonso, C., Caballer, M., Alvarruiz, F., Moltó, G.: An economic and energy-aware analysis of the viability of outsourcing cluster computing to the cloud. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. (Int. J. Grid Comput eScience) 29, 704–712 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.08.014Williams, D., Jamjoom, H., Liu, Y.H., Weatherspoon, H.: Overdriver: handling memory overload in an oversubscribed cloud. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 46(7), 205 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2007477.1952709 . http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2007477.1952709Valentini, G., Lassonde, W., Khan, S., Min-Allah, N., Madani, S., Li, J., Zhang, L., Wang, L., Ghani, N., Kolodziej, J., Li, H., Zomaya, A., Xu, C.Z., Balaji, P., Vishnu, A., Pinel, F., Pecero, J., Kliazovich, D., Bouvry, P.: An overview of energy efficiency techniques in cluster computing systems. Clust. Comput. 16(1), 3–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-011-0171-xDe Alfonso, C., Caballer, M., Hernández, V.: Efficient power management in high performance computer clusters. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Multi-conference on Innovative Developments in ICT, Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Computing 2010 (ICGreen 2010), 39–44 (2010)OpenNebula: OpenNebula Cloud Software https://opennebula.org/ . [Online; accessed 12-June-2017]OpenStack: OpenStack Cloud Software. http://openstack.org . [Online; accessed 12 June 2017]VMWare: VMWare vCenter Server. https://www.vmware.com/products/vcenter-server.html . [Online; accessed 12 June 2017]De Alfonso, C., Blanquer, I.: Automatic consolidation of virtual machines in on-premises cloud platforms. In: IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, pp 1070–1079 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2017.128Chase, J.S., Irwin, D.E., Grit, L.E., Moore, J.D., Sprenkle, S.E.: Dynamic virtual clusters in a grid site manager. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC ’03, p 90. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2003). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=822087.823392Doelitzscher, F., Held, M., Reich, C., Sulistio, A.: Viteraas: Virtual cluster as a service. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pp 652–657 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2011.101Wei, X., Wang, H., Li, H., Zou, L.: Dynamic deployment and management of elastic virtual clusters. In: 2011 Sixth Annual Chinagrid Conference (ChinaGrid), pp 35–41 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ChinaGrid.2011.31de Assuncao, M.D., di Costanzo, A., Buyya, R.: Evaluating the cost-benefit of using cloud computing to extend the capacity of clusters. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC ’09, pp 141–150. ACM, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1551609.1551635 . http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1551609.1551635Marshall, P., Keahey, K., Freeman, T.: Elastic site: Using clouds to elastically extend site resources. In: 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), pp 43–52 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2010.80Niu, S., Zhai, J., Ma, X., Tang, X., Chen, W.: Cost-effective cloud hpc resource provisioning by building semi-elastic virtual clusters. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC ’13, pp 56:1–56:12. ACM, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2503210.2503236 . http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2503210.2503236Bialecki, A., Cafarella, M., Cutting, D., Omalley, O.: Hadoop: a framework for running applications on large clusters built of commodity hardware. Tech. rep. Apache Hadoop. http://hadoop.apache.org (2005)MIT: StarCluster Elastic Load Balancer. http://web.mit.edu/stardev/cluster/docs/0.92rc2/manual/load_balancer.htmlAppliance, C.C.S.: Creating elastic virtual clusters. http://cernvm.cern.ch/portal/elasticclusters (2015)Research project, T.G.: The games research project. http://www.green-datacenters.eu (2013)Cioara, T., Anghel, I., Salomie, I., Copil, G., Moldovan, D., Kipp, A.: Energy aware dynamic resource consolidation algorithm for virtualized service centers based on reinforcement learning. In: 2011 10th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC), pp 163–169 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPDC.2011.32Farahnakian, F., Liljeberg, P., Plosila, J.: Energy-efficient virtual machines consolidation in cloud data centers using reinforcement learning. In: 2014 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP), pp 500–507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2014.109Masoumzadeh, S., Hlavacs, H.: Integrating vm selection criteria in distributed dynamic vm consolidation using fuzzy q-learning. In: 2013 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), pp 332–338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/CNSM.2013.6727854Feller, E., Rilling, L., Morin, C.: Energy-aware ant colony based workload placement in clouds. In: 2011 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing (GRID), pp 26–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/Grid.2011.13Pop, C.B., Anghel, I., Cioara, T., Salomie, I., Vartic, I.: A swarm-inspired data center consolidation methodology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, WIMS ’12, pp 41:1–41:7. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2254129.2254180Marzolla, M., Babaoglu, O., Panzieri, F.: Server consolidation in clouds through gossiping. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, WOWMOM ’11, pp 1–6. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986483Ghafari, S., Fazeli, M., Patooghy, A., Rikhtechi, L.: Bee-mmt: A load balancing method for power consumption management in cloud computing. In: 2013 Sixth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), pp 76–80 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2013.6612165Ajiro, Y., Tanaka, A.: Improving packing algorithms for server consolidation. In: International CMG Conference, pp. 399–406. Computer Measurement Group (2007)Verma, A., Ahuja, P., Neogi, A.: pmapper: power and migration cost aware application placement in virtualized systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware, Middleware ’08, pp 243–264. Springer, New York (2008)Beloglazov, A., Abawajy, J., Buyya, R.: Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28 (5), 755–768 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.04.017Guazzone, M., Anglano, C., Canonico, M.: Exploiting vm migration for the automated power and performance management of green cloud computing systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Energy Efficient Data Centers, E2DC’12, pp 81–92. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33645-4_8Shi, L., Furlong, J., Wang, R.: Empirical evaluation of vector bin packing algorithms for energy efficient data centers. In: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp 000,009–000,015 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2013.6754915Tomás, L., Tordsson, J.: Improving cloud infrastructure utilization through overbooking. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Cloud and Autonomic Computing Conference on - CAC ’13, p 1. ACM Press, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2494621.2494627Dawoud, W., Takouna, I., Meinel, C.: Elastic vm for cloud resources provisioning optimization. In: Abraham, A., Lloret Mauri, J., Buford, J., Suzuki, J., Thampi, S. (eds.) Advances in Computing and Communications, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 190, pp 431–445. Springer, Berlin (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22709-7_43Tasoulas, E., Haugerund, H.R., Begnum, K.: Bayllocator: a proactive system to predict server utilization and dynamically allocate memory resources using Bayesian networks and ballooning. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Large Installation System Administration: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques, pp. 111–122. USENIX Association (2012)Hines, M.R., Gordon, A., Silva, M., Da Silva, D., Ryu, K., Ben-Yehuda, M.: Applications know best: performance-driven memory overcommit with Ginkgo. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, pp. 130–137. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2011.27 (2011)Litke, A.: Manage resources on overcommitted KVM hosts. Tech. rep. IBM. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-overcommit-kvm-resources/ (2011)De Alfonso, C., Caballer, M., Alvarruiz, F., Hernández, V.: An energy management system for cluster infrastructures. Comput. Electr. Eng. 39(8), 2579–2590 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.05.004Moltó, G., Caballer, M, de Alfonso, C.: Automatic memory-based vertical elasticity and oversubscription on cloud platforms. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 56, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.10.002Calatrava, A., Romero, E., Moltó, G., Caballer, M., Alonso, J.M.: Self-managed cost-efficient virtual elastic clusters on hybrid Cloud infrastructures. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 61, 13–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.01.018 . http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S0167739X16300024 , http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167739X16300024Caballer, M., Chatziangelou, M., Calatrava, A., Moltó, G., Pérez, A.: IM integration in the EGI VMOps Dashboard. In: EGI Conference 2017 and INDIGO Summit 2017 (2017)Calatrava, A., Caballer, M., Moltó, G., Pérez, A.: Virtual Elastic Clusters in the EGI LToS with EC3. In: EGI Conference 2017 and INDIGO Summit 2017 (2017)Iosup, A., Li, H., Jan, M., Anoep, S., Dumitrescu, C., Wolters, L., Epema, D.H.: The grid workloads archive. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 24(7), 672–686 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.02.003 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X08000125Nordugrid dataset, the grid workloads archive (Online; accessed 27-March-2017). http://gwa.ewi.tudelft.nl/datasets/gwa-t-3-nordugrid/report/Caballer, M., Blanquer, I., Moltó, G., de Alfonso, C: Dynamic Management of Virtual Infrastructures. J. Grid Comput. 13, 53–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-014-9296-5 . http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10723-014-9296-

Efficient and elastic management of computing infrastructures

Tesis por compendio[EN] Modern data centers integrate a lot of computer and electronic devices. However, some reports state that the mean usage of a typical data center is around 50% of its peak capacity, and the mean usage of each server is between 10% and 50%. A lot of energy is destined to power on computer hardware that most of the time remains idle. Therefore, it would be possible to save energy simply by powering off those parts from the data center that are not actually used, and powering them on again as they are needed. Most data centers have computing clusters that are used for intensive computing, recently evolving towards an on-premises Cloud service model. Despite the use of low consuming components, higher energy savings can be achieved by dynamically adapting the system to the actual workload. The main approach in this case is the usage of energy saving criteria for scheduling the jobs or the virtual machines into the working nodes. The aim is to power off idle servers automatically. But it is necessary to schedule the power management of the servers in order to minimize the impact on the end users and their applications. The objective of this thesis is the elastic and efficient management of cluster infrastructures, with the aim of reducing the costs associated to idle components. This objective is addressed by automating the power management of the working nodes in a computing cluster, and also proactive stimulating the load distribution to achieve idle resources that could be powered off by means of memory overcommitment and live migration of virtual machines. Moreover, this automation is of interest for virtual clusters, as they also suffer from the same problems. While in physical clusters idle working nodes waste energy, in the case of virtual clusters that are built from virtual machines, the idle working nodes can waste money in commercial Clouds or computational resources in an on-premises Cloud.[ES] En los Centros de Procesos de Datos (CPD) existe una gran concentración de dispositivos informáticos y de equipamiento electrónico. Sin embargo, algunos estudios han mostrado que la utilización media de los CPD está en torno al 50%, y que la utilización media de los servidores se encuentra entre el 10% y el 50%. Estos datos evidencian que existe una gran cantidad de energía destinada a alimentar equipamiento ocioso, y que podríamos conseguir un ahorro energético simplemente apagando los componentes que no se estén utilizando. En muchos CPD suele haber clusters de computadores que se utilizan para computación de altas prestaciones y para la creación de Clouds privados. Si bien se ha tratado de ahorrar energía utilizando componentes de bajo consumo, también es posible conseguirlo adaptando los sistemas a la carga de trabajo en cada momento. En los últimos años han surgido trabajos que investigan la aplicación de criterios energéticos a la hora de seleccionar en qué servidor, de entre los que forman un cluster, se debe ejecutar un trabajo o alojar una máquina virtual. En muchos casos se trata de conseguir equipos ociosos que puedan ser apagados, pero habitualmente se asume que dicho apagado se hace de forma automática, y que los equipos se encienden de nuevo cuando son necesarios. Sin embargo, es necesario hacer una planificación de encendido y apagado de máquinas para minimizar el impacto en el usuario final. En esta tesis nos planteamos la gestión elástica y eficiente de infrastructuras de cálculo tipo cluster, con el objetivo de reducir los costes asociados a los componentes ociosos. Para abordar este problema nos planteamos la automatización del encendido y apagado de máquinas en los clusters, así como la aplicación de técnicas de migración en vivo y de sobreaprovisionamiento de memoria para estimular la obtención de equipos ociosos que puedan ser apagados. Además, esta automatización es de interés para los clusters virtuales, puesto que también sufren el problema de los componentes ociosos, sólo que en este caso están compuestos por, en lugar de equipos físicos que gastan energía, por máquinas virtuales que gastan dinero en un proveedor Cloud comercial o recursos en un Cloud privado.[CA] En els Centres de Processament de Dades (CPD) hi ha una gran concentració de dispositius informàtics i d'equipament electrònic. No obstant això, alguns estudis han mostrat que la utilització mitjana dels CPD està entorn del 50%, i que la utilització mitjana dels servidors es troba entre el 10% i el 50%. Estes dades evidencien que hi ha una gran quantitat d'energia destinada a alimentar equipament ociós, i que podríem aconseguir un estalvi energètic simplement apagant els components que no s'estiguen utilitzant. En molts CPD sol haver-hi clusters de computadors que s'utilitzen per a computació d'altes prestacions i per a la creació de Clouds privats. Si bé s'ha tractat d'estalviar energia utilitzant components de baix consum, també és possible aconseguir-ho adaptant els sistemes a la càrrega de treball en cada moment. En els últims anys han sorgit treballs que investiguen l'aplicació de criteris energètics a l'hora de seleccionar en quin servidor, d'entre els que formen un cluster, s'ha d'executar un treball o allotjar una màquina virtual. En molts casos es tracta d'aconseguir equips ociosos que puguen ser apagats, però habitualment s'assumix que l'apagat es fa de forma automàtica, i que els equips s'encenen novament quan són necessaris. No obstant això, és necessari fer una planificació d'encesa i apagat de màquines per a minimitzar l'impacte en l'usuari final. En esta tesi ens plantegem la gestió elàstica i eficient d'infrastructuras de càlcul tipus cluster, amb l'objectiu de reduir els costos associats als components ociosos. Per a abordar este problema ens plantegem l'automatització de l'encesa i apagat de màquines en els clusters, així com l'aplicació de tècniques de migració en viu i de sobreaprovisionament de memòria per a estimular l'obtenció d'equips ociosos que puguen ser apagats. A més, esta automatització és d'interés per als clusters virtuals, ja que també patixen el problema dels components ociosos, encara que en este cas estan compostos per, en compte d'equips físics que gasten energia, per màquines virtuals que gasten diners en un proveïdor Cloud comercial o recursos en un Cloud privat.Alfonso Laguna, CD. (2015). Efficient and elastic management of computing infrastructures [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/57187Compendi

Container-based Virtual Elastic Clusters

[EN] eScience demands large-scale computing clusters to support the efficient execution of resource-intensive scientific applications. Virtual Machines (VMs) have introduced the ability to provide customizable execution environments, at the expense of performance loss for applications. However, in recent years, containers have emerged as a light-weight virtualization technology compared to VMs. Indeed, the usage of containers for virtual clusters allows better performance for the applications and fast deployment of additional working nodes, for enhanced elasticity. This paper focuses on the deployment, configuration and management of Virtual Elastic computer Clusters (VEC) dedicated to process scientific workloads. The nodes of the scientific cluster are hosted in containers running on bare-metal machines. The opensource tool Elastic Cluster for Docker (EC4Docker) is introduced, integrated with Docker Swarm to create auto-scaled virtual computer clusters of containers across distributed deployments. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of this solution and analyse the performance of the developed tools under a real scenario by means of a scientific use case that demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed approach.This work has been developed under the support of the program "Ayudas para la contratacion de personal investigador en formacion de catheter predoctoral, programa VALi+d", grant number ACIF/2013/003, from the Conselleria d'Educacio of the Generalitat Valenciana. The authors wish to thank the financial support received form The Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness to develop the project "CLUVIEM", with reference TIN2013-44390-R.Alfonso Laguna, CD.; Calatrava Arroyo, A.; Moltó, G. (2017). Container-based Virtual Elastic Clusters. Journal of Systems and Software. 127:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.007S11112

HIL: designing an exokernel for the data center

We propose a new Exokernel-like layer to allow mutually untrusting physically deployed services to efficiently share the resources of a data center. We believe that such a layer offers not only efficiency gains, but may also enable new economic models, new applications, and new security-sensitive uses. A prototype (currently in active use) demonstrates that the proposed layer is viable, and can support a variety of existing provisioning tools and use cases.Partial support for this work was provided by the MassTech Collaborative Research Matching Grant Program, National Science Foundation awards 1347525 and 1149232 as well as the several commercial partners of the Massachusetts Open Cloud who may be found at http://www.massopencloud.or

Real-Time Virtualization and Cloud Computing

In recent years, we have observed three major trends in the development of complex real-time embedded systems. First, to reduce cost and enhance flexibility, multiple systems are sharing common computing platforms via virtualization technology, instead of being deployed separately on physically isolated hosts. Second, multi-core processors are increasingly being used in real-time systems. Third, developers are exploring the possibilities of deploying real-time applications as virtual machines in a public cloud. The integration of real-time systems as virtual machines (VMs) atop common multi-core platforms in a public cloud raises significant new research challenges in meeting the real-time latency requirements of applications. In order to address the challenges of running real-time VMs in the cloud, we first present RT-Xen, a novel real-time scheduling framework within the popular Xen hypervisor. We start with single-core scheduling in RT-Xen, and present the first work that empirically studies and compares different real-time scheduling schemes on a same platform. We then introduce RT-Xen 2.0, which focuses on multi-core scheduling and spanning multiple design spaces, including priority schemes, server schemes, and scheduling policies. Experimental results demonstrate that when combined with compositional scheduling theory, RT-Xen can deliver real-time performance to an application running in a VM, while the default credit scheduler cannot. After that, we present RT-OpenStack, a cloud management system designed to support co-hosting real-time and non-real-time VMs in a cloud. RT-OpenStack studies the problem of running real-time VMs together with non-real-time VMs in a public cloud. Leveraging the resource interface and real-time scheduling provided by RT-Xen, RT-OpenStack provides real-time performance guarantees to real-time VMs, while achieving high resource utilization by allowing non-real-time VMs to share the remaining CPU resources through a novel VM-to-host mapping scheme. Finally, we present RTCA, a real-time communication architecture for VMs sharing a same host, which maintains low latency for high priority inter-domain communication (IDC) traffic in the face of low priority IDC traffic

A Self-managed Mesos Cluster for Data Analytics with QoS Guarantees

[EN] This article describes the development of an automated configuration of a software platform for Data Analytics that supports horizontal and vertical elasticity to guarantee meeting a specific deadline. It specifies all the components, software dependencies and configurations required to build up the cluster, and analyses the deployment times of different instances, as well as the horizontal and vertical elasticity. The approach followed builds up self-managed hybrid clusters that can deal with different workloads and network requirements. The article describes the structure of the recipes, points out to public repositories where the code is available and discusses the limitations of the approach as well as the results of several experiments.The work presented in this article has been partially funded by a research grant from the regional government of the Comunitat Valenciana (Spain), co-funded by the European Union ERDF funds (European Regional Development Fund) of the Comunitat Valenciana 2014-2020, with reference IDIFEDER/2018/032 (High-Performance Algorithms for the Modelling, Simulation and early Detection of diseases in Personalized Medicine). The authors would also like to thank the Spanish "Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad" for the project "BigCLOE" with reference number TIN2016-79951-R.López-Huguet, S.; Pérez-González, AM.; Calatrava Arroyo, A.; Alfonso Laguna, CD.; Caballer Fernández, M.; Moltó, G.; Blanquer Espert, I. (2019). A Self-managed Mesos Cluster for Data Analytics with QoS Guarantees. Future Generation Computer Systems. 96:449-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.047S4494619