Incremental Packing Problems: Algorithms and Polyhedra

In this thesis, we propose and study discrete, multi-period extensions of classical packing problems, a fundamental class of models in combinatorial optimization. Those extensions fall under the general name of incremental packing problems. In such models, we are given an added time component and different capacity constraints for each time. Over time, capacities are weakly increasing as resources increase, allowing more items to be selected. Once an item is selected, it cannot be removed in future times. The goal is to maximize some (possibly also time-dependent) objective function under such packing constraints. In Chapter 2, we study the generalized incremental knapsack problem, a multi-period extension to the classical knapsack problem. We present a policy that reduces the generalized incremental knapsack problem to sequentially solving multiple classical knapsack problems, for which many efficient algorithms are known. We call such an algorithm a single-time algorithm. We prove that this algorithm gives a (0.17 - ⋲)-approximation for the generalized incremental knapsack problem. Moreover, we show that the algorithm is very efficient in practice. On randomly generated instances of the generalized incremental knapsack problem, it returns near optimal solutions and runs much faster compared to Gurobi solving the problem using the standard integer programming formulation. In Chapter 3, we present additional approximation algorithms for the generalized incremental knapsack problem. We first give a polynomial-time (½-⋲)-approximation, improving upon the approximation ratio given in Chapter 2. This result is based on a new reformulation of the generalized incremental knapsack problem as a single-machine sequencing problem, which is addressed by blending dynamic programming techniques and the classical Shmoys-Tardos algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Using the same sequencing reformulation, combined with further enumeration-based self-reinforcing ideas and new structural properties of nearly-optimal solutions, we give a quasi-polynomial time approximation scheme for the problem, thus ruling out the possibility that the generalized incremental knapsack problem is APX-hard under widely-believed complexity assumptions. In Chapter 4, we first turn our attention to the submodular monotone all-or-nothing incremental knapsack problem (IK-AoN), a special case of the submodular monotone function subject to a knapsack constraint extended to a multi-period setting. We show that each instance of IK-AoN can be reduced to a linear version of the problem. In particular, using a known PTAS for the linear version from literature as a subroutine, this implies that IK-AoN admits a PTAS. Next, we study special cases of the generalized incremental knapsack problem and provide improved approximation schemes for these special cases. In Chapter 5, we give a polynomial-time (¼-⋲)-approximation in expectation for the incremental generalized assignment problem, a multi-period extension of the generalized assignment problem. To develop this result, similar to the reformulation from Chapter 3, we reformulate the incremental generalized assignment problem as a multi-machine sequencing problem. Following the reformulation, we show that the (½-⋲)-approximation for the generalized incremental knapsack problem, combined with further randomized rounding techniques, can be leveraged to give a constant factor approximation in expectation for the incremental generalized assignment problem. In Chapter 6, we turn our attention to the incremental knapsack polytope. First, we extend one direction of Balas's characterization of 0/1-facets of the knapsack polytope to the incremental knapsack polytope. Starting from extended cover inequalities valid for the knapsack polytope, we show how to strengthen them to define facets for the incremental knapsack polytope. In particular, we prove that under the same conditions for which these inequalities define facets for the knapsack polytope, following our strengthening procedure, the resulting inequalities define facets for the incremental knapsack polytope. Then, as there are up to exponentially many such inequalities, we give separation algorithms for this class of inequalities

Truthful Assignment without Money

We study the design of truthful mechanisms that do not use payments for the generalized assignment problem (GAP) and its variants. An instance of the GAP consists of a bipartite graph with jobs on one side and machines on the other. Machines have capacities and edges have values and sizes; the goal is to construct a welfare maximizing feasible assignment. In our model of private valuations, motivated by impossibility results, the value and sizes on all job-machine pairs are public information; however, whether an edge exists or not in the bipartite graph is a job's private information. We study several variants of the GAP starting with matching. For the unweighted version, we give an optimal strategyproof mechanism; for maximum weight bipartite matching, however, we show give a 2-approximate strategyproof mechanism and show by a matching lowerbound that this is optimal. Next we study knapsack-like problems, which are APX-hard. For these problems, we develop a general LP-based technique that extends the ideas of Lavi and Swamy to reduce designing a truthful mechanism without money to designing such a mechanism for the fractional version of the problem, at a loss of a factor equal to the integrality gap in the approximation ratio. We use this technique to obtain strategyproof mechanisms with constant approximation ratios for these problems. We then design an O(log n)-approximate strategyproof mechanism for the GAP by reducing, with logarithmic loss in the approximation, to our solution for the value-invariant GAP. Our technique may be of independent interest for designing truthful mechanisms without money for other LP-based problems.Comment: Extended abstract appears in the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 201

Generalized Assignment via Submodular Optimization with Reserved Capacity

We study a variant of the generalized assignment problem (GAP) with group constraints. An instance of (Group GAP) is a set I of items, partitioned into L groups, and a set of m uniform (unit-sized) bins. Each item i in I has a size s_i >0, and a profit p_{i,j} >= 0 if packed in bin j. A group of items is satisfied if all of its items are packed. The goal is to find a feasible packing of a subset of the items in the bins such that the total profit from satisfied groups is maximized. We point to central applications of Group GAP in Video-on-Demand services, mobile Device-to-Device network caching and base station cooperation in 5G networks. Our main result is a 1/6-approximation algorithm for Group GAP instances where the total size of each group is at most m/2. At the heart of our algorithm lies an interesting derivation of a submodular function from the classic LP formulation of GAP, which facilitates the construction of a high profit solution utilizing at most half the total bin capacity, while the other half is reserved for later use. In particular, we give an algorithm for submodular maximization subject to a knapsack constraint, which finds a solution of profit at least 1/3 of the optimum, using at most half the knapsack capacity, under mild restrictions on element sizes. Our novel approach of submodular optimization subject to a knapsack with reserved capacity constraint may find applications in solving other group assignment problems