48,707 research outputs found
Interval simulation: raising the level of abstraction in architectural simulation
Detailed architectural simulators suffer from a long development cycle and extremely long evaluation times. This longstanding problem is further exacerbated in the multi-core processor era. Existing solutions address the simulation problem by either sampling the simulated instruction stream or by mapping the simulation models on FPGAs; these approaches achieve substantial simulation speedups while simulating performance in a cycle-accurate manner This paper proposes interval simulation which rakes a completely different approach: interval simulation raises the level of abstraction and replaces the core-level cycle-accurate simulation model by a mechanistic analytical model. The analytical model estimates core-level performance by analyzing intervals, or the timing between two miss events (branch mispredictions and TLB/cache misses); the miss events are determined through simulation of the memory hierarchy, cache coherence protocol, interconnection network and branch predictor By raising the level of abstraction, interval simulation reduces both development time and evaluation time. Our experimental results using the SPEC CPU2000 and PARSEC benchmark suites and the MS multi-core simulator show good accuracy up to eight cores (average error of 4.6% and max error of 11% for the multi-threaded full-system workloads), while achieving a one order of magnitude simulation speedup compared to cycle-accurate simulation. Moreover interval simulation is easy to implement: our implementation of the mechanistic analytical model incurs only one thousand lines of code. Its high accuracy, fast simulation speed and ease-of-use make interval simulation a useful complement to the architect's toolbox for exploring system-level and high-level micro-architecture trade-offs
RPPM : Rapid Performance Prediction of Multithreaded workloads on multicore processors
Analytical performance modeling is a useful complement to detailed cycle-level simulation to quickly explore the design space in an early design stage. Mechanistic analytical modeling is particularly interesting as it provides deep insight and does not require expensive offline profiling as empirical modeling. Previous work in mechanistic analytical modeling, unfortunately, is limited to single-threaded applications running on single-core processors.
This work proposes RPPM, a mechanistic analytical performance model for multi-threaded applications on multicore hardware. RPPM collects microarchitecture-independent characteristics of a multi-threaded workload to predict performance on a previously unseen multicore architecture. The profile needs to be collected only once to predict a range of processor architectures. We evaluate RPPM's accuracy against simulation and report a performance prediction error of 11.2% on average (23% max). We demonstrate RPPM's usefulness for conducting design space exploration experiments as well as for analyzing parallel application performance
DeLTA: GPU Performance Model for Deep Learning Applications with In-depth Memory System Traffic Analysis
Training convolutional neural networks (CNNs) requires intense compute
throughput and high memory bandwidth. Especially, convolution layers account
for the majority of the execution time of CNN training, and GPUs are commonly
used to accelerate these layer workloads. GPU design optimization for efficient
CNN training acceleration requires the accurate modeling of how their
performance improves when computing and memory resources are increased. We
present DeLTA, the first analytical model that accurately estimates the traffic
at each GPU memory hierarchy level, while accounting for the complex reuse
patterns of a parallel convolution algorithm. We demonstrate that our model is
both accurate and robust for different CNNs and GPU architectures. We then show
how this model can be used to carefully balance the scaling of different GPU
resources for efficient CNN performance improvement
The multi-program performance model: debunking current practice in multi-core simulation
Composing a representative multi-program multi-core workload is non-trivial. A multi-core processor can execute multiple independent programs concurrently, and hence, any program mix can form a potential multi-program workload. Given the very large number of possible multiprogram workloads and the limited speed of current simulation methods, it is impossible to evaluate all possible multi-program workloads. This paper presents the Multi-Program Performance Model (MPPM), a method for quickly estimating multiprogram multi-core performance based on single-core simulation runs. MPPM employs an iterative method to model the tight performance entanglement between co-executing programs on a multi-core processor with shared caches. Because MPPM involves analytical modeling, it is very fast, and it estimates multi-core performance for a very large number of multi-program workloads in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, it provides confidence bounds on its performance estimates. Using SPEC CPU2006 and up to 16 cores, we report an average performance prediction error of 2.3% and 2.9% for system throughput (STP) and average normalized turnaround time (ANTT), respectively, while being up to five orders of magnitude faster than detailed simulation. Subsequently, we demonstrate that randomly picking a limited number of multi-program workloads, as done in current pactice, can lead to incorrect design decisions in practical design and research studies, which is alleviated using MPPM. In addition, MPPM can be used to quickly identify multi-program workloads that stress multi-core performance through excessive conflict behavior in shared caches; these stress workloads can then be used for driving the design process further
Analytic Performance Modeling and Analysis of Detailed Neuron Simulations
Big science initiatives are trying to reconstruct and model the brain by
attempting to simulate brain tissue at larger scales and with increasingly more
biological detail than previously thought possible. The exponential growth of
parallel computer performance has been supporting these developments, and at
the same time maintainers of neuroscientific simulation code have strived to
optimally and efficiently exploit new hardware features. Current state of the
art software for the simulation of biological networks has so far been
developed using performance engineering practices, but a thorough analysis and
modeling of the computational and performance characteristics, especially in
the case of morphologically detailed neuron simulations, is lacking. Other
computational sciences have successfully used analytic performance engineering
and modeling methods to gain insight on the computational properties of
simulation kernels, aid developers in performance optimizations and eventually
drive co-design efforts, but to our knowledge a model-based performance
analysis of neuron simulations has not yet been conducted.
We present a detailed study of the shared-memory performance of
morphologically detailed neuron simulations based on the Execution-Cache-Memory
(ECM) performance model. We demonstrate that this model can deliver accurate
predictions of the runtime of almost all the kernels that constitute the neuron
models under investigation. The gained insight is used to identify the main
governing mechanisms underlying performance bottlenecks in the simulation. The
implications of this analysis on the optimization of neural simulation software
and eventually co-design of future hardware architectures are discussed. In
this sense, our work represents a valuable conceptual and quantitative
contribution to understanding the performance properties of biological networks
simulations.Comment: 18 pages, 6 figures, 15 table
Forecasting the cost of processing multi-join queries via hashing for main-memory databases (Extended version)
Database management systems (DBMSs) carefully optimize complex multi-join
queries to avoid expensive disk I/O. As servers today feature tens or hundreds
of gigabytes of RAM, a significant fraction of many analytic databases becomes
memory-resident. Even after careful tuning for an in-memory environment, a
linear disk I/O model such as the one implemented in PostgreSQL may make query
response time predictions that are up to 2X slower than the optimal multi-join
query plan over memory-resident data. This paper introduces a memory I/O cost
model to identify good evaluation strategies for complex query plans with
multiple hash-based equi-joins over memory-resident data. The proposed cost
model is carefully validated for accuracy using three different systems,
including an Amazon EC2 instance, to control for hardware-specific differences.
Prior work in parallel query evaluation has advocated right-deep and bushy
trees for multi-join queries due to their greater parallelization and
pipelining potential. A surprising finding is that the conventional wisdom from
shared-nothing disk-based systems does not directly apply to the modern
shared-everything memory hierarchy. As corroborated by our model, the
performance gap between the optimal left-deep and right-deep query plan can
grow to about 10X as the number of joins in the query increases.Comment: 15 pages, 8 figures, extended version of the paper to appear in
SoCC'1
- …