82,672 research outputs found
Negotiating with a logical-linguistic protocol in a dialogical framework
This book is the result of years of reflection. Some time ago, while working in
commodities, the author felt how difficult it was to decide the order in which to
use arguments during a negotiation process. What would happen if we translated the arguments into cards and played them according to the rules of the
Bridge game? The results were impressive. There was potential for improvement in the negotiation process. The investigation went deeper, exploring players, cards, deals and the information concealed in the players´ announcements,
in the cards and in the deals. This new angle brought the research to NeuroLinguistic Patterns and cryptic languages, such as Russian Cards.
In the following pages, the author shares her discovery of a new application for
Logical Dialogues: Negotiations, tackled from basic linguistic structures placed
under a dialogue form as a cognitive system which ‘understands’ natural language, with the aim to solve conflicts and even to serve peace
Spartan Daily, November 28, 2006
Volume 127, Issue 50https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/10308/thumbnail.jp
Spartan Daily, February 12, 1991
Volume 96, Issue 10https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/8078/thumbnail.jp
The Dutch Banking Chipcard Game
The banks in the Dutch chipcard market initially agreed on one chipcard system. One system is attractive for companies as well as consumers. Companies, banks and retailers, prevent costs of duplication, while consumers enjoy the benefits of a widespread acceptance of one card and do not face uncertainty regarding the chipcard standard. Two standards could harm the development of the chipcard market. However, one bank withdrew from the initial agreement and introduced its own chipcard system in December 1995. This has resulted in a costly battle between the two banking chipcard standards, duplication costs for retailers, the introduction of a gateway technology in order to establish compatibility for users, and low market acceptance of the chipcards. March 2001, after a struggle of more than five years, the banks decided to return to one chipcard. The rationality of the decision to withdraw, despite the prospect that everybody may be worse off, will be analyzed from the perspective of game theory and the theory regarding standards battles.standardization;Banking;chipcard;electronic purse;game theory
Spartan Daily, September 9, 2013
Volume 141, Issue 5https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/1424/thumbnail.jp
Intermediate reading exercises for use with the Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficulty.
Thesis (Ed.M.)--Boston Universit
- …