6,642 research outputs found
Modelling Users, Intentions, and Structure in Spoken Dialog
We outline how utterances in dialogs can be interpreted using a partial first
order logic. We exploit the capability of this logic to talk about the truth
status of formulae to define a notion of coherence between utterances and
explain how this coherence relation can serve for the construction of AND/OR
trees that represent the segmentation of the dialog. In a BDI model we
formalize basic assumptions about dialog and cooperative behaviour of
participants. These assumptions provide a basis for inferring speech acts from
coherence relations between utterances and attitudes of dialog participants.
Speech acts prove to be useful for determining dialog segments defined on the
notion of completing expectations of dialog participants. Finally, we sketch
how explicit segmentation signalled by cue phrases and performatives is covered
by our dialog model.Comment: 17 page
A Mention-Ranking Model for Abstract Anaphora Resolution
Resolving abstract anaphora is an important, but difficult task for text
understanding. Yet, with recent advances in representation learning this task
becomes a more tangible aim. A central property of abstract anaphora is that it
establishes a relation between the anaphor embedded in the anaphoric sentence
and its (typically non-nominal) antecedent. We propose a mention-ranking model
that learns how abstract anaphors relate to their antecedents with an
LSTM-Siamese Net. We overcome the lack of training data by generating
artificial anaphoric sentence--antecedent pairs. Our model outperforms
state-of-the-art results on shell noun resolution. We also report first
benchmark results on an abstract anaphora subset of the ARRAU corpus. This
corpus presents a greater challenge due to a mixture of nominal and pronominal
anaphors and a greater range of confounders. We found model variants that
outperform the baselines for nominal anaphors, without training on individual
anaphor data, but still lag behind for pronominal anaphors. Our model selects
syntactically plausible candidates and -- if disregarding syntax --
discriminates candidates using deeper features.Comment: In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural
Language Processing (EMNLP). Copenhagen, Denmar
- …