Development of replenishment and inventory management practices

Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering; in conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT, 2001.Includes bibliographical references (p. 47).by Joshua B. Miller.S.M.M.B.A

Strategic Inventories in a Supply Chain with Vertical Control and Downstream Cournot Competition

Strategic Inventory (SI) has been an area of increased interest in theoretical supply chain literature recently. Most of the work so far however, has only considered a supply chain without downstream competition between retailers. Competition is ubiquitous in most market situations, hence, interactions between SI and retailer competition merits study as a first step in bringing the conversations and insights from this stream of literature to the real world. We present here a two-period and a three-period model of one manufacturer supplying an identical product to two retailers who form a Cournot duopoly. We also study a Commitment contract, where the manufacturer commits to all the selling seasons’ wholesale prices at the beginning of the 1st period. Commitment contracts have been shown previously to eliminate SI carriage over two selling seasons in the absence of retailer competition. We aim to deduce if this type of contract has the same effect in the presence of downstream competition. We determine closed-form Nash Equilibrium decision variable values for each of these models using game-theoretic modeling, a price-dependent linear demand function, and backward induction. We find that, the introduction of downstream Cournot duopoly competition leads to lower profits for both the manufacturer and retailer. This holds, whether the number of selling season is two or three. Consumer Surplus is also uniformly lower under retailer competition, compared to a downstream monopoly supply chain. When we try to deduce the effect of SI carriage under Cournot duopoly competition, by comparing an SC with Cournot duopoly competition and SI allowed between periods, to a similar SC with a Cournot duopoly downstream and a static, repeating, one-shot game in each period, with no SI carried – we find again that manufacturer and retailer profits are both lower when SI carriage is allowed. This holds whether the number of selling seasons is two or three. Consumer Surplus is also lower uniformly over both two and three selling seasons. Under a Commitment contract, over two selling seasons, the manufacturer ends up with an advantage, making a higher profit with downstream retailer competition, than compared to supplying to a monopoly downstream under the same contract. The retailers, while competing as a Cournot duopoly, are not able to use the relative advantage that comes from a Commitment contract to make a higher profit, as they are, when the downstream is a single retailer monopoly. The consumer also is disadvantaged by the introduction of downstream Cournot competition under a Commitment contract. When we compare a manufacturer supplying to a Cournot duopoly downstream of retailers, with, and without a Commitment contract (dynamic ordering), we see that the manufacturer and consumer benefit under a Commitment contract, making higher profits, but the retailer is at a disadvantage. It would be an interesting extension of this work to generalize the results from two and three selling seasons, presented here, to the “n” period case. It would also be benefi-cial to run empirical studies in real-world supply chains to validate if and to what extent the insights developed by this kind of game-theoretic modeling hold in a real-world supply chain setting. Development of contracts that are more effective than a Commitment con-tract in coordinating this supply chain would be another possible area for further research

Summary of Research on Order Financing Decision Optimization and Risk Management

To alleviate the pressure of financing for small and medium-sized enterprises in my country, order financing has become one of the effective ways to solve the financing difficulties of China's small and medium-sized enterprises. Order financing is a kind of supply chain financing mode. Compared with traditional accounts payable financing, order financing advances the financing link, accelerates the capital turnover efficiency, and better solves the urgent demand for funds of small and medium-sized enterprises. This paper reviews the research status of order financing from three aspects: order financing model evolution, decision optimization, and risk management. Through combing the existing literature, it puts forward appropriate policy recommendations for the order financing model under the current development status, which will provide direction for the development of order financing in the future

An optimal two-level supply chain model for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) considering rework for new products and price-dependent demands

With the advent of new technologies, several factors such as globalization of markets, customers' different needs, and increasingly fierce economic competition have encouraged Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) to improve their engagement with suppliers and to involve themselves with cost management practices in order to survive. SMEs clearly need to focus on the interests of the entire supply chain by enacting win-win policies. In this regard, the present study investigated a two-level inventory model featuring a manufacturer and a buyer in the competitive market with the policy of producing new products. The proposed model took into account imperfect and low-quality products and their capacities for rework. In other words, due to the competitive nature of the market, any increase in prices would lead to a decrease in demand. The mathematical model was proposed in two scenarios: one with the possibility of shortage and one without it. The objective function of the mathematical model revolves around maximizing the total profit of the supply chain considering both independent and joint optimization by the supply chain members. A new algorithm was then proposed to solve the mathematical model whose applicability was evaluated by using a numerical example in the analysis software MATLAB as the input. The results were then analyzed and discussed based on a sensitivity analysis approach

Vendor managed inventory adoption in Malaysia construction industry

The growth of the Malaysian construction industry is burdened by conditions in which 'time overruns' in projects still exist. The quest to overcome construction delays motivates the industry to improve its performance by learning from the other industries. Supply chain management is an important aspect of performance in construction projects recognised by literatures in recent years. The distinctive characteristic of supply chain management in construction does compare to other industries to motivate the need to collaborate horizontally and vertically within the construction industry. Vendor- managed inventory (VMI), famous for eliminating additional costs that may result from the excessive supply and stock-in-hand inventory as practised in other industries, may potentially be adopted and implemented in the construction industry. Therefore, conditions in which VMI is suitable to be adopted, barriers to the effort to adopt VMI and the readiness of the contractors to adopt VMI were evaluated in this study. The results of the survey using 97 ClDB grade G7 registered contractors in Malaysia, show that suppliers' market competition, supplier-buyer cooperation, and demand uncertainty positively influence the intention of contractors to adopt VMI. However, notwithstanding that G7 contractors are large contractors in Malaysia, perceived lack of trust and mutual misunderstanding between supply chain partners are considered top among the many barriers to adopt VMI despite evidence that respondents of the study indicate moderate to high readiness to adopt the recommendations of the study. The study contributes to literature on VMI in the area of the construction industry which has not been explored comprehensively

Evaluation of sales and operations planning in a process industry

Cette thèse porte sur la planification des ventes et des opérations (S±&OP) dans une chaîne d'approvisionnements axée sur la demande. L'objectif de la S±&OP, dans un tel contexte, est de tirer profit de l'alignement de la demande des clients avec la capacité de la chaîne d'approvisionnement par la coordination de la planification des ventes, de la production, de la distribution et de l'approvisionnement. Un tel processus de planification exige une collaboration multifonctionnelle profonde ainsi que l'intégration de la planification. Le but étant d'anticiper l'impact des décisions de vente sur les performances de la chaîne logistique , alors que l'influence de la dynamique des marchés est prise en compte pour les décisions concernant la production, la distribution et l'approvisionnement. La recherche a été menée dans un environnement logistique manufacturier multi-site et multi-produit, avec un approvisionnement et des ventes régis par des contrats ou le marché. Cette thèse examine deux approches de S±&OP et fournit un support à la décision pour l'implantation de ces méthodes dans une chaîne logistique multi-site de fabrication sur commande. Dans cette thèse, une planification traditionnelle des ventes et de la production basée sur la S±feOP et une planification S±fcOP plus avancée de la chaîne logistique sont tout d'abord caractérisées. Dans le système de chaîne logistique manufacturière multi-site, nous définissons la S±&OP traditionnelle comme un système dans lequel la planification des ventes et de la production est effectuée conjointement et centralement, tandis que la planification de la distribution et de l'approvisionnement est effectuée séparément et localement à chaque emplacement. D'autre part, la S±fcOP avancée de la chaîne logistique consiste en la planification des ventes, de la production, de la distribution et de l'approvisionnement d'une chaîne d'approvisionnement effectuée conjointement et centralement. Basés sur cette classification, des modèles de programmation en nombres entiers et des modèles de simulation sur un horizon roulant sont développés, représentant, respectivement, les approches de S±&OP traditionnelle et avancée, et également, une planification découplée traditionnelle, dans laquelle la planification des ventes est effectuée centralement et la planification de la production, la distribution et l'approvisionnement est effectuée séparément et localement par les unités d'affaires. La validation des modèles et l'évaluation pré-implantation sont effectuées à l'aide d'un cas industriel réel utilisant les données d'une compagnie de panneaux de lamelles orientées. Les résultats obtenus démontrent que les deux méthodes de S±feOP (traditionnelle et avancée) offrent une performance significativement supérieure à celle de la planification découplée, avec des bénéfices prévus supérieurs de 3,5% et 4,5%, respectivement. Les résultats sont très sensibles aux conditions de marché. Lorsque les prix du marché descendent ou que la demande augmente, de plus grands bénéfices peuvent être réalisés. Dans le cadre de cette recherche, les décisions de vente impliquent des ventes régies par des contrats et le marché. Les décisions de contrat non optimales affectent non seulement les revenus, mais également la performance manufacturière et logistique et les décisions de contrats d'approvisionnement en matière première. Le grand défi est de concevoir et d'offrir les bonnes politiques de contrat aux bons clients de sorte que la satisfaction des clients soit garantie et que l'attribution de la capacité de la compagnie soit optimisée. Également, il faut choisir les bons contrats des bons fournisseurs, de sorte que les approvisionnements en matière première soient garantis et que les objectifs financiers de la compagnie soient atteints. Dans cette thèse, un modèle coordonné d'aide à la décision pour les contrats e développé afin de fournir une aide à l'intégration de la conception de contrats, de l'attribution de capacité et des décisions de contrats d'approvisionnement pour une chaîne logistique multi-site à trois niveaux. En utilisant la programmation stochastique à deux étapes avec recours, les incertitudes liées à l'environnement et au système sont anticipées et des décisions robustes peuvent être obtenues. Les résultats informatiques montrent que l'approche de modélisation proposée fournit des solutions de contrats plus réalistes et plus robustes, avec une performance prévue supérieure d'environ 12% aux solutions fournies par un modèle déterministe