Enriching ontological user profiles with tagging history for multi-domain recommendations

Many advanced recommendation frameworks employ ontologies of various complexities to model individuals and items, providing a mechanism for the expression of user interests and the representation of item attributes. As a result, complex matching techniques can be applied to support individuals in the discovery of items according to explicit and implicit user preferences. Recently, the rapid adoption of Web2.0, and the proliferation of social networking sites, has resulted in more and more users providing an increasing amount of information about themselves that could be exploited for recommendation purposes. However, the unification of personal information with ontologies using the contemporary knowledge representation methods often associated with Web2.0 applications, such as community tagging, is a non-trivial task. In this paper, we propose a method for the unification of tags with ontologies by grounding tags to a shared representation in the form of Wordnet and Wikipedia. We incorporate individuals' tagging history into their ontological profiles by matching tags with ontology concepts. This approach is preliminary evaluated by extending an existing news recommendation system with user tagging histories harvested from popular social networking sites

Tracking epistemic beliefs and sensemaking in collaborative information retrieval

Collaborative information retrieval is an area of increasing interest. However, the wider sensemaking context in which it occurs is understudied. Furthermore, the role of users’ beliefs about the domain they are querying, its structure, stability, complexity, and justifications – their epistemic beliefs – has been little studied in either individual or collaborative IR software development contexts. Here we discuss a tool to combine the knowledge mapping tool Cohere, with reference management capabilities through which the iterative, epistemically germane, potentially (but not necessarily) collaborative IR process may be ‘brought out’ both for sensemaking, and research purposes

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationDisease-specific ontologies, designed to structure and represent the medical knowledge about disease etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, are essential for many advanced applications, such as predictive modeling, cohort identification, and clinical decision support. However, manually building disease-specific ontologies is very labor-intensive, especially in the process of knowledge acquisition. On the other hand, medical knowledge has been documented in a variety of biomedical knowledge resources, such as textbook, clinical guidelines, research articles, and clinical data repositories, which offers a great opportunity for an automated knowledge acquisition. In this dissertation, we aim to facilitate the large-scale development of disease-specific ontologies through automated extraction of disease-specific vocabularies from existing biomedical knowledge resources. Three separate studies presented in this dissertation explored both manual and automated vocabulary extraction. The first study addresses the question of whether disease-specific reference vocabularies derived from manual concept acquisition can achieve a near-saturated coverage (or near the greatest possible amount of disease-pertinent concepts) by using a small number of literature sources. Using a general-purpose, manual acquisition approach we developed, this study concludes that a small number of expert-curated biomedical literature resources can prove sufficient for acquiring near-saturated disease-specific vocabularies. The second and third studies introduce automated techniques for extracting disease-specific vocabularies from both MEDLINE citations (title and abstract) and a clinical data repository. In the second study, we developed and assessed a pipeline-based system which extracts disease-specific treatments from PubMed citations. The system has achieved a mean precision of 0.8 for the top 100 extracted treatment concepts. In the third study, we applied classification models to reduce irrelevant disease-concepts associations extracted from MEDLINE citations and electronic medical records. This study suggested the combination of measures of relevance from disparate sources to improve the identification of true-relevant concepts through classification and also demonstrated the generalizability of the studied classification model to new diseases. With the studies, we concluded that existing biomedical knowledge resources are valuable sources for extracting disease-concept associations, from which classification based on statistical measures of relevance could assist a semi-automated generation of disease-specific vocabularies

Combining knowledge discovery, ontologies, annotations, and semantic wikis

Semantic Wikis provide an original and operational infrastructure for efficiently com- bining semantic technologies and collaborative design activities. This text presents: a running example and its context (organization of the collections in a museum); concepts of wikis as a tool to allow computer supported cooperative work (cscw); concepts of se- mantic technologies and knowledge representation; concepts and examples of semantic wikis; anatomy of a semantic wiki (reasoning tools, storage, querying); and research directions.Laboratorio de Investigación y Formación en Informática Avanzad

Report of the Stanford Linked Data Workshop

The Stanford University Libraries and Academic Information Resources (SULAIR) with the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) conducted at week-long workshop on the prospects for a large scale, multi-national, multi-institutional prototype of a Linked Data environment for discovery of and navigation among the rapidly, chaotically expanding array of academic information resources. As preparation for the workshop, CLIR sponsored a survey by Jerry Persons, Chief Information Architect emeritus of SULAIR that was published originally for workshop participants as background to the workshop and is now publicly available. The original intention of the workshop was to devise a plan for such a prototype. However, such was the diversity of knowledge, experience, and views of the potential of Linked Data approaches that the workshop participants turned to two more fundamental goals: building common understanding and enthusiasm on the one hand and identifying opportunities and challenges to be confronted in the preparation of the intended prototype and its operation on the other. In pursuit of those objectives, the workshop participants produced:1. a value statement addressing the question of why a Linked Data approach is worth prototyping;2. a manifesto for Linked Libraries (and Museums and Archives and …);3. an outline of the phases in a life cycle of Linked Data approaches;4. a prioritized list of known issues in generating, harvesting & using Linked Data;5. a workflow with notes for converting library bibliographic records and other academic metadata to URIs;6. examples of potential “killer apps” using Linked Data: and7. a list of next steps and potential projects.This report includes a summary of the workshop agenda, a chart showing the use of Linked Data in cultural heritage venues, and short biographies and statements from each of the participants