STR2: Optimized Simple Tabular Reduction for Table Constraints

International audienceTable constraints play an important role within constraint programming. Recently, many schemes or algorithms have been proposed to propagate table constraints and/or to compress their representation. In this paper, we describe an optimization of simple tabular reduction (STR), a technique proposed by J. Ullmann to dynamically maintain the tables of supports when generalized arc consistency (GAC) is enforced/maintained. STR2, the new refined GAC algorithm we propose, allows us to limit the number of operations related to validity checking and search of supports. Interestingly enough, this optimization makes simple tabular reduction potentially r times faster where r is the arity of the constraint(s). The results of an extensive experimentation that we have conducted with respect to random and structured instances indicate that STR2 is usually around twice as fast as the original STR, two or three times faster than the approach based on the hidden variable encoding, and can be up to one order of magnitude faster than previously state-of-the art (generic) GAC algorithms on some series of instances. When comparing STR2 with the more recently developed algorithm based on multi-valued decision diagrams (MDDs), we show that both approaches are rather complementary

XCSP3-core: A Format for Representing Constraint Satisfaction/Optimization Problems

In this document, we introduce XCSP3-core, a subset of XCSP3 that allows us to represent constraint satisfaction/optimization problems. The interest of XCSP3-core is multiple: (i) focusing on the most popular frameworks (CSP and COP) and constraints, (ii) facilitating the parsing process by means of dedicated XCSP3-core parsers written in Java and C++ (using callback functions), (iii) and defining a core format for comparisons (competitions) of constraint solvers.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1611.0339

Designing and Optimizing Representations for Non-Binary Constraints

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

Implementation and Applications of Ad Hoc Constraints

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

Learning to Select SAT Encodings for Pseudo-Boolean and Linear Integer Constraints

Many constraint satisfaction and optimisation problems can be solved effectively by encoding them as instances of the Boolean Satisfiability problem (SAT). However, even the simplest types of constraints have many encodings in the literature with widely varying performance, and the problem of selecting suitable encodings for a given problem instance is not trivial. We explore the problem of selecting encodings for pseudo-Boolean and linear constraints using a supervised machine learning approach. We show that it is possible to select encodings effectively using a standard set of features for constraint problems; however we obtain better performance with a new set of features specifically designed for the pseudo-Boolean and linear constraints. In fact, we achieve good results when selecting encodings for unseen problem classes. Our results compare favourably to AutoFolio when using the same feature set. We discuss the relative importance of instance features to the task of selecting the best encodings, and compare several variations of the machine learning method.Comment: 24 pages, 10 figures, submitted to Constraints Journal (Springer

PYCSP3: Modeling Combinatorial Constrained Problems in Python

In this document, we introduce PYCSP$3$, a Python library that allows us to write models of combinatorial constrained problems in a simple and declarative way. Currently, with PyCSP$3$, you can write models of constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. More specifically, you can build CSP (Constraint Satisfaction Problem) and COP (Constraint Optimization Problem) models. Importantly, there is a complete separation between modeling and solving phases: you write a model, you compile it (while providing some data) in order to generate an XCSP3 instance (file), and you solve that problem instance by means of a constraint solver. In this document, you will find all that you need to know about PYCSP$3$, with more than 40 illustrative models

Interactive Cost Configuration Over Decision Diagrams

Abstract In many AI domains such as product configuration, a user should interactively specify a solution that must satisfy a set of constraints. In such scenarios, offline compilation of feasible solutions into a tractable representation is an important approach to delivering efficient backtrack-free user interaction online. In particular, binary decision diagrams (BDDs) have been successfully used as a compilation target for product and service configuration. In this paper we discuss how to extend BDD-based configuration to scenarios involving cost functions which express user preferences. We first show that an efficient, robust and easy to implement extension is possible if the cost function is additive, and feasible solutions are represented using multi-valued decision diagrams (MDDs). We also discuss the effect on MDD size if the cost function is non-additive or if it is encoded explicitly into MDD. We then discuss interactive configuration in the presence of multiple cost functions. We prove that even in its simplest form, multiple-cost configuration is NP-hard in the input MDD. However, for solving two-cost configuration we develop a pseudo-polynomial scheme and a fully polynomial approximation scheme. The applicability of our approach is demonstrated through experiments over real-world configuration models and product-catalogue datasets. Response times are generally within a fraction of a second even for very large instances

Domain value mutation and other techniques for constraint satisfaction problems

The term Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) refers to a class of NP-complete problems, a collection of difficult problems for which no fast solution is known. The standard definition of a CSP involves variables, values, and constraints: each variable must be assigned a value from a designated group of possible values (also known as the variable’s domain), while a constraint on a set of variables indicates permissible combinations of values for these variables. Given a CSP, an important objective is to query whether it has a solution — an assignment of each variable to a value such that all constraints are satisfied. Solving a CSP usually requires chronological backtracking search that interleaves variable assignments with various kinds of inferences in order to reduce the search space. This dissertation comprises two parts. The first part deals with a modification of the classical CSP model that allows a value to be broken up and multiple values to be combined. The second part deals with generalized arc consistency algorithms. Both parts share a common theme in that extensional constraints --‐ the most basic expression possible for constraints --- play the central role. Despite being an important class, extensional constraints have received much less attention recently as most efforts have been channelled toward identifying new types of specialized constraints and coming up with corresponding algorithms. Regardless, improvements to algorithms for extensional constraints are more fundamental. This dissertation will attempt to improve existing techniques and algorithms for extensional constraints by examining them critically from the bottom up and approaching them from a novel direction