162,228 research outputs found

    On sets of integers which contain no three terms in geometric progression

    Full text link
    The problem of looking for subsets of the natural numbers which contain no 3-term arithmetic progressions has a rich history. Roth's theorem famously shows that any such subset cannot have positive upper density. In contrast, Rankin in 1960 suggested looking at subsets without three-term geometric progressions, and constructed such a subset with density about 0.719. More recently, several authors have found upper bounds for the upper density of such sets. We significantly improve upon these bounds, and demonstrate a method of constructing sets with a greater upper density than Rankin's set. This construction is optimal in the sense that our method gives a way of effectively computing the greatest possible upper density of a geometric-progression-free set. We also show that geometric progressions in Z/nZ behave more like Roth's theorem in that one cannot take any fixed positive proportion of the integers modulo a sufficiently large value of n while avoiding geometric progressions.Comment: 16 page

    Improved Bounds for Progression-Free Sets in C^n₈

    Get PDF
    Let G be a finite group, and let r₃(G) represent the size of the largest subset of G without non-trivial three-term progressions. In a recent breakthrough, Croot, Lev and Pach proved that r₃(C₄^n) ≤ (3.611)^n, where C_m denotes the cyclic group of order m. For finite abelian groups G≅∏^n_(i=1), where m₁,…,m_n denote positive integers such that m₁ |…|m_n, this also yields a bound of the form r₃(G)⩽(0.903)^(rk₄(G))|G|, with rk₄(G) representing the number of indices i ∈ {1,…, n} with 4 |m_i. In particular, r₃(Cn₈) ≤ (7.222)^n. In this paper, we provide an exponential improvement for this bound, namely r₃(Cn₈) ≤ (7.0899)^n

    The number of subsets of integers with no kk-term arithmetic progression

    Get PDF
    Addressing a question of Cameron and Erd\Ho s, we show that, for infinitely many values of nn, the number of subsets of {1,2,,n}\{1,2,\ldots, n\} that do not contain a kk-term arithmetic progression is at most 2O(rk(n))2^{O(r_k(n))}, where rk(n)r_k(n) is the maximum cardinality of a subset of {1,2,,n}\{1,2,\ldots, n\} without a kk-term arithmetic progression. This bound is optimal up to a constant factor in the exponent. For all values of nn, we prove a weaker bound, which is nevertheless sufficient to transfer the current best upper bound on rk(n)r_k(n) to the sparse random setting. To achieve these bounds, we establish a new supersaturation result, which roughly states that sets of size Θ(rk(n))\Theta(r_k(n)) contain superlinearly many kk-term arithmetic progressions. For integers rr and kk, Erd\Ho s asked whether there is a set of integers SS with no (k+1)(k+1)-term arithmetic progression, but such that any rr-coloring of SS yields a monochromatic kk-term arithmetic progression. Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and R\"odl, and independently Spencer, answered this question affirmatively. We show the following density version: for every k3k\ge 3 and δ>0\delta>0, there exists a reasonably dense subset of primes SS with no (k+1)(k+1)-term arithmetic progression, yet every USU\subseteq S of size UδS|U|\ge\delta|S| contains a kk-term arithmetic progression. Our proof uses the hypergraph container method, which has proven to be a very powerful tool in extremal combinatorics. The idea behind the container method is to have a small certificate set to describe a large independent set. We give two further applications in the appendix using this idea.Comment: To appear in International Mathematics Research Notices. This is a longer version than the journal version, containing two additional minor applications of the container metho

    Four-term progression free sets with three-term progressions in all large subsets

    Get PDF
    This paper is mainly concerned with sets which do not contain four-term arithmetic progressions, but are still very rich in three term arithmetic progressions, in the sense that all sufficiently large subsets contain at least one such progression. We prove that there exists a positive constant cc and a set AFqnA \subset \mathbb F_q^n which does not contain a four-term arithmetic progression, with the property that for every subset AAA' \subset A with AA1c|A'| \geq |A|^{1-c}, AA' contains a nontrivial three term arithmetic progression. We derive this from a more general quantitative Roth-type theorem in random subsets of Fqn\mathbb{F}_{q}^{n}, which improves a result of Kohayakawa-Luczak-R\"odl/Tao-Vu. We also discuss a similar phenomenon over the integers, where we show that for all ϵ>0\epsilon >0, and all sufficiently large NNN \in \mathbb N, there exists a four-term progression-free set AA of size NN with the property that for every subset AAA' \subset A with A1(logN)1ϵN|A'| \gg \frac{1}{(\log N)^{1-\epsilon}} \cdot N contains a nontrivial three term arithmetic progression. Finally, we include another application of our methods, showing that for sets in Fqn\mathbb{F}_{q}^{n} or Z\mathbb{Z} the property of "having nontrivial three-term progressions in all large subsets" is almost entirely uncorrelated with the property of "having large additive energy".Comment: minor updates including suggestions from referee
    corecore