39 research outputs found

    Rainbow perfect matchings in r-partite graph structures

    Get PDF
    A matching M in an edge–colored (hyper)graph is rainbow if each pair of edges in M have distinct colors. We extend the result of Erdos and Spencer on the existence of rainbow perfect matchings in the complete bipartite graph Kn,n to complete bipartite multigraphs, dense regular bipartite graphs and complete r-partite r-uniform hypergraphs. The proof of the results use the Lopsided version of the Local Lovász Lemma.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Colored Saturation Parameters for Bipartite Graphs

    Get PDF
    Let F and H be fixed graphs and let G be a spanning subgraph of H. G is an F-free subgraph of H if F is not a subgraph of G. We say that G is an F-saturated subgraph of H if G is F-free and for any edge e in E(H)-E(G), F is a subgraph of G+e. The saturation number of F in K_{n,n}, denoted sat(K_{n,n}, F), is the minimum size of an F-saturated subgraph of K_{n,n}. A t-edge-coloring of a graph G is a labeling f: E(G) to [t], where [t] denotes the set { 1, 2, ..., t }. The labels assigned to the edges are called colors. A rainbow coloring is a coloring in which all edges have distinct colors. Given a family F of edge-colored graphs, a t-edge-colored graph H is (F, t)-saturated if H contains no member of F but the addition of any edge in any color completes a member of F. In this thesis we study the minimum size of ( F,t)-saturated subgraphs of edge-colored complete bipartite graphs. Specifically we provide bounds on the minimum size of these subgraphs for a variety of families of edge-colored bipartite graphs, including monochromatic matchings, rainbow matchings, and rainbow stars

    Rainbow matchings in edge-colored simple graphs

    Full text link
    There has been much research on the topic of finding a large rainbow matching (with no two edges having the same color) in a properly edge-colored graph, where a proper edge coloring is a coloring of the edge set such that no same-colored edges are incident. Bar\'at, Gy\'arf\'as, and S\'ark\"ozy conjectured that in every proper edge coloring of a multigraph (with parallel edges allowed, but not loops) with 2q2q colors where each color appears at least qq times, there is always a rainbow matching of size qq. Recently, Aharoni, Berger, Chudnovsky, Howard, and Seymour proved a relaxation of the conjecture with 3q−23q-2 colors. Our main result proves that 2q+o(q)2q + o(q) colors are enough if the graph is simple, confirming the conjecture asymptotically for simple graphs. This question restricted to simple graphs was considered before by Aharoni and Berger. We also disprove one of their conjectures regarding the lower bound on the number of colors one needs in the conjecture of Bar\'at, Gy\'arf\'as, and S\'ark\"ozy for the class of simple graphs. Our methods are inspired by the randomized algorithm proposed by Gao, Ramadurai, Wanless, and Wormald to find a rainbow matching of size qq in a graph that is properly edge-colored with qq colors, where each color class contains q+o(q)q + o(q) edges. We consider a modified version of their algorithm, with which we are able to prove a generalization of their statement with a slightly better error term in o(q)o(q). As a by-product of our techniques, we obtain a new asymptotic version of the Brualdi-Ryser-Stein Conjecture.Comment: minor correction

    On sets not belonging to algebras and rainbow matchings in graphs

    Get PDF
    Motivated by a question of Grinblat, we study the minimal number v(n) that satisfies the following. If A1,…,An are equivalence relations on a set X such that for every i∈[n] there are at least v(n) elements whose equivalence classes with respect to Ai are nontrivial, then A1,…,An contain a rainbow matching, i.e. there exist 2n distinct elements x1,y1,…,xn,yn∈X with xi∼Aiyi for each i∈[n]. Grinblat asked whether v(n)=3n−2 for every n≥4. The best-known upper bound was v(n)≤16n/5+O(1) due to Nivash and Omri. Transferring the problem into the setting of edge-coloured multigraphs, we affirm Grinblat's question asymptotically, i.e. we show that v(n)=3n+o(n)
    corecore