538 research outputs found

    Improving Reliability and Assessing Performance of Global Navigation Satellite System Precise Point Positioning Ambiguity Resolution

    Get PDF
    Conventional Precise Point Positioning (PPP) has always required a relatively long initialization period (few tens of minutes at least) for the carrier-phase ambiguities to converge to constant values and for the solution to reach its optimal precision. The classical PPP convergence period is primarily caused by the estimation of the carrier-phase ambiguity from the relatively noisy pseudoranges and the estimation of atmospheric delay. If the underlying integer nature of the ambiguity is known, it can be resolved, thereby reducing the convergence time of conventional PPP. To recover the underlying integer nature of the carrier-phase ambiguities, different strategies for mitigating the satellite and receiver dependent equipment delays have been developed, and products made publicly available to enable ambiguity resolution without any baseline restrictions. There has been limited research within the scope of interoperability of the products, combining the products to improve reliability and assessment of ambiguity resolution within the scope of being an integrity indicator. This study seeks to develop strategies to enable each of these and examine their feasibility. The advantage of interoperability of the different PPP ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) products would be to permit the PPP user to transform independently generated PPP-AR products to obtain multiple fixed solutions of comparable precision and accuracy. The ability to provide multiple solutions would increase the reliability of the solution for, e.g., real-time processing: if there were an outage in the generation of the PPP-AR products, the user could instantly switch streams to a different provider. The satellite clock combinations routinely produced within the International GNSS Service (IGS) currently disregard that analysis centers (ACs) provide products which enable ambiguity resolution. Users have been expected to choose either an IGS product which is a combined product from multiple ACs or select an individual AC solution which provides products that enable PPP-AR. The goal of the novel research presented was to develop and test a robust satellite clock combination preserving the integer nature of the carrier-phase ambiguities at the user end. mm-level differences were noted, which was expected as the strength lies mainly in its reliability and stable median performance and the combined product is better than or equivalent to any single ACs product in the combination process. As have been shown in relative positioning and PPP-AR, ambiguity resolution is critical for enabling cm-level positioning. However, what if specifications where at the few dm-level, such as 10 cm and 20 cm horizontal what role does ambiguity resolution play? The role of ambiguity resolution relies primarily on what are the user specifications. If the user specifications are at the few cm-level, ambiguity resolution is an asset as it improves convergence and solution stability. Whereas, if the users specification is at the few dm-level, ambiguity resolution offers limited improvement over the float solution. If the user has the resources to perform ambiguity resolution, even when the specifications are at the few dm-level, it should be utilized

    Undifferenced and Uncombined GNSS Time Transfer and its Space Applications

    Get PDF
    This thesis presents a framework for developing a state-of-the-art undifferenced and uncombined (UDUC) time transfer technique for space applications. It addresses challenges in GNSS time transfer, such as multi-frequency signal modelling, satellite clock estimation, and hardware delay variations. The thesis introduces the UDUC POD method for GNSS time transfer in space and explores the feasibility of constructing a LEO-based space-time reference. This PhD dissertation is among the first to investigate the UDUC GNSS time transfer

    ์„ผํ‹ฐ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๊ธ‰ ๊ด‘์—ญ ๋ณด๊ฐ•ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์ƒ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ๊ธฐ์ฐฝ๋ˆ.Recently, the demand for high-precision navigation systems for centimeter-level service has been growing rapidly for various Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. The network Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) is one of the candidate solution to provide high-accuracy position to user in real-time. However, the network RTK requires a lot of reference stations for nationwide service. Furthermore, it requires high-speed data-link for broadcasting their scalar-type corrections. This dissertation proposed a new concept of satellite augmentation system called Compact Wide-Area RTK, which provides centimeter-level positioning service on national or continental scales to overcoming the limitation of the legacy network RTK methods. Using the wide-area network of multiple reference stations whose distance is 200~1,000 km, the proposed system generates three types of carrier-phase-based corrections: satellite orbit corrections, satellite code/phase clock (CPC) corrections, tropospheric corrections. Through the strategy of separating the scalar-type corrections of network RTK into vector forms of each error component, it is enable to expand network RTK coverage to continental scale using a similar number of reference stations as legacy meter-level Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS). Furthermore, it is possible to broadcast their corrections over a wide-area using geosynchronous (GEO) satellite with extremely low-speed datalink of 250 bps likewise of legacy SBAS. To sum up, the proposed system can improve position accuracy by centimeter-level while maintaining the hardware infrastructure of the meter-level legacy SBAS. This study mainly discussed on the overall system architecture and core algorithms for generating satellite CPC corrections and tropospheric corrections. This study proposed a new Three-Carrier Ambiguity Resolution (TCAR) algorithm using ionosphere-free combinations to correctly solve the integer ambiguity in wide-area without any ionospheric corrections. The satellite CPC corrections are calculated based on multiple stations for superior and robust performance under communication delay and outage. The proposed algorithm dramatically reduced the latency compensation errors and message amounts with compare to conventional RTK protocols. The tropospheric corrections of the compact wide-area RTK system are computed using GPS-estimated precise tropospheric delay and weather data based model together. The proposed algorithm adopts spherical harmonics function to significantly reduce the message amounts and required number of GPS reference stations than the network RTK and Precise Point Positioning-RTK (PPP-RTK), while accurately modeling the spatial characteristic of tropospheric delay with weather data together. In order to evaluate the user domain performance of the compact wide-area RTK system, this study conducted the feasibility test on mid-west and south USA using actual GPS measurements. As a result, the 95% horizontal position error is about 1.9 cm and the 95% vertical position error is 7.0 cm after the integer ambiguity is correctly fixed using GPS-only signals. The user ambiguity resolution takes about 2 minutes, and success-fix rate is about 100 % when stable tropospheric condition. In conclusion, the compact wide-area RTK system can provide centimeter-level positioning service to wide-area coverage with extremely low-speed data link via GEO satellite. We hope that this new system will consider as candidate solution for nationwide centimeter-level service such as satellite augmentation system of the Korea Positioning System (KPS).์ตœ๊ทผ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ž๋™์ฐจ, ๋ฌด์ธ ๋“œ๋ก  ๋ฐฐ์†ก, ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ, ๋ฌด์ธํŠธ๋ž™ํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ๋ฌด์ธ ๊ฒฝ์ž‘ ๋“ฑ ์œ„์„ฑํ•ญ๋ฒ•์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(GNSS, Global Navigation Satellite System)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‘์šฉ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ cm ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์œ„์น˜ ์ •๋ณด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 1 m ๊ธ‰์˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ๋†’์€ ์œ„์น˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ •์ง€๊ถค๋„์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ด‘์—ญ ๋ณด๊ฐ•ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(SBAS, Satellite-Based Augmentation System)์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ์ธํ”„๋ผ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ˆ˜ cm ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ดˆ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์ƒ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ธก์œ„(RTK, Real-Time Kinematic)๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ์ธก์ •์น˜์— ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ cm ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ์•ฝ 50~70 km ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋œ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” Network RTK ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋™์  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ„์น˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ธํ”„๋ผ๋กœ์„œ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์Šค์นผ๋ผ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ Network RTK ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๋ณ„๋กœ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์œ„์„ฑ ์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ƒ์„ฑ์ด ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ณด์ • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€ ์ „์†ก์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋งŽ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ณ ์†์˜ ํ†ต์‹  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ง€์—ฐ์ด๋‚˜ ํ†ต์‹  ๋‹จ์ ˆ์— ๋งค์šฐ ์ทจ์•ฝํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์Šค์นผ๋ผ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์™€ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ€์–ด์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ณด์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€๋ฅ™ ํ˜น์€ ๋‚˜๋ผ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๊ด‘์—ญ์—์„œ ์„œ๋น„์Šคํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์‹ญ~์ˆ˜๋ฐฑ ๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ์ธํ”„๋ผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, SBAS๊ฐ€ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ์ง€์—ญ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด 5~7๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด Network RTK๋Š” 90~100๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ Network RTK๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ์œ ์ง€ ๋น„์šฉ์ด SBAS ๋Œ€๋น„ ์•ฝ 15๋ฐฐ ์ •๋„ ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ค๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด Network RTK์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€๋ฅ™ ๊ธ‰ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ cm๊ธ‰ ์ดˆ์ •๋ฐ€ ์œ„์น˜๊ฒฐ์ • ์„œ๋น„์Šค ์ œ๊ณต์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ Compact Wide-Area RTK ๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐœ๋…์˜ ๊ด‘์—ญ๋ณด๊ฐ•ํ•ญ๋ฒ•์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Compact Wide-Area RTK๋Š” ์•ฝ 200~1,000 km ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋„“๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ถค๋„ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด, ์œ„์„ฑ Code/Phase ์‹œ๊ณ„ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด, ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์Šค์นผ๋ผ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ Network RTK ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ๋Œ€์‹  ์˜ค์ฐจ ์š”์†Œ ๋ณ„ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์„œ๋น„์Šค ์˜์—ญ์„ ํ™•์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ SBAS์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ 250 bps์˜ ์ €์† ํ†ต์‹  ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ •์ง€๊ถค๋„์œ„์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ด‘์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ๋ฐฉ์†ก์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์ค‘ ์œ„์„ฑ Code/Phase ์‹œ๊ณ„ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด์™€ ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์ƒ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ค‘์ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์ƒ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋จผ์ € ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ผ์ค‘ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ์ธก์ •์น˜์˜ ๋ฌด-์ „๋ฆฌ์ธต ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „๋ฆฌ์ธต ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์—†์ด๋„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ Code/Phase ์‹œ๊ณ„ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด๋Š” ํ†ต์‹  ์ง€์—ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์žฅ ์‹œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ธก์ •์น˜๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๋ณ„ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ์•ž์„œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๊ฐ„ ์ด์ค‘์ฐจ๋ถ„ ๋œ ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์œ„์„ฑ Code/Phase ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ, ๋ณ€ํ™”์œจ, ์žก์Œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ํ†ต์‹  ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ ์˜ค์ฐจ ๋ณด์ƒ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด RTK ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ ๋ณด๋‹ค 99% ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด๋Š” ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๋งŒ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž๋™ ๊ธฐ์ƒ๊ด€์ธก์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ƒ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” GNSS ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ๋ฐ˜์†กํŒŒ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต ์ง€์—ฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ƒ์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋œ ์ˆ˜์ง ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต ์ง€์—ฐ์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ๋ฉด์กฐํ™”ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Network RTK ๋ฐ PPP-RTK ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€ ์–‘๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉด์„œ๋„ RMS 2 cm ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ณด์ •์ •๋ณด ์ƒ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ Compact Wide-Area RTK ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋™๋ถ€ ์ง€์—ญ 6๊ฐœ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ตญ์˜ ์‹ค์ธก GPS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดํ›„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ 95% ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์œ„์น˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ 1.9 cm, 95% ์ˆ˜์ง ์œ„์น˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ 7.0 cm ๋กœ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๋ฏธ์ง€์ •์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์ธต ์•ˆ์ • ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์•ฝ 2๋ถ„ ๋‚ด๋กœ 100% ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ํ–ฅํ›„ ํ•œ๊ตญํ˜• ์œ„์„ฑํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(KPS, Korean Positioning System)์˜ ์ „๊ตญ ๋‹จ์œ„ ์„ผํ‹ฐ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๊ธ‰ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Purpose 1 1.2 Former Research 4 1.3 Outline of the Dissertation 7 1.4 Contributions 8 CHAPTER 2. Overview of GNSS Augmentation System 11 2.1 GNSS Measurements 11 2.2 GNSS Error Sources 14 2.2.1 Traditional GNSS Error Sources 14 2.2.2 Special GNSS Error Sources 21 2.2.3 Summary 28 2.3 GNSS Augmentation System 29 2.3.1 Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) 29 2.3.2 Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) 32 2.3.3 Precise Point Positioning (PPP) 36 2.3.4 Summary 40 CHAPTER 3. Compact Wide-Area RTK System Architecture 43 3.1 Compact Wide-Area RTK Architecture 43 3.1.1 WARTK Reference Station (WRS) 48 3.1.2 WARTK Processing Facility (WPF) 51 3.1.3 WARTK User 58 3.2 Ambiguity Resolution and Validation Algorithms of Compact Wide-Area RTK System 59 3.2.1 Basic Theory of Ambiguity Resolution and Validation 60 3.2.2 A New Ambiguity Resolution Algorithms for Multi-Frequency Signals 65 3.2.3 Extra-Wide-Lane (EWL) Ambiguity Resolution 69 3.2.4 Wide-Lane (WL) Ambiguity Resolution 71 3.2.5 Narrow-Lane (NL) Ambiguity Resolution 78 3.3 Compact Wide-Area RTK Corrections 83 3.3.1 Satellite Orbit Corrections 86 3.3.2 Satellite Code/Phase Clock (CPC) Corrections 88 3.3.3 Tropospheric Corrections 89 3.3.4 Message Design for GEO Broadcasting 90 CHAPTER 4. Code/Phase Clock (CPC) Correction Generation Algorithm 93 4.1 Former Research of RTK Correction Protocol 93 4.1.1 Observation Based RTK Data Protocol 93 4.1.2 Correction Based RTK Data Protocol 95 4.1.3 Compact RTK Protocol 96 4.2 Satellite CPC Correction Generation Algorithm 100 4.2.1 Temporal Decorrelation Error Reduced Methods 102 4.2.2 Ambiguity Level Adjustment 105 4.2.3 Receiver Clock Synchronization 107 4.2.4 Averaging Filter of Satellite CPC Correction 108 4.2.5 Ambiguity Re-Initialization and Message Generation 109 4.3 Correction Performance Analysis Results 111 4.3.1 Feasibility Test Environments 111 4.3.2 Comparison of RTK Correction Protocol 113 4.3.3 Latency Compensation Performance Analysis 116 4.3.4 Message Data Bandwidth Analysis 119 CHAPTER 5. Tropospheric Correction Generation Algorithm 123 5.1 Former Research of Tropospheric Correction 123 5.1.1 Tropospheric Corrections for SBAS 124 5.1.2 Tropospheric Corrections of Network RTK 126 5.1.3 Tropospheric Corrections of PPP-RTK 130 5.2 Tropospheric Correction Generation Algorithm 136 5.2.1 ZWD Estimation Using Carrier-Phase Observations 138 5.2.2 ZWD Measurements Using Weather Data 142 5.2.3 Correction Generation Using Spherical Harmonics 149 5.2.4 Correction Applying Method for User 157 5.3 Correction Performance Analysis Results 159 5.3.1 Feasibility Test Environments 159 5.3.2 Zenith Correction Domain Analysis 161 5.3.3 Message Data Bandwidth Analysis 168 CHAPTER 6. Compact Wide-Area RTK User Test Results 169 6.1 Compact Wide-Area RTK User Process 169 6.2 User Performance Test Results 173 6.2.1 Feasibility Test Environments 173 6.2.2 User Range Domain Analysis 176 6.2.3 User Ambiguity Domain Analysis 182 6.2.4 User Position Domain Analysis 184 CHAPTER 7. Conclusions 189 Bibliography 193 ์ดˆ ๋ก 207Docto

    Review of code and phase biases in multi-GNSS positioning

    Get PDF
    A review of the research conducted until present on the subject of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) hardware-induced phase and code biases is here provided. Biases in GNSS positioning occur because of imperfections and/or physical limitations in the GNSS hardware. The biases are a result of small delays between events that ideally should be simultaneous in the transmission of the signal from a satellite or in the reception of the signal in a GNSS receiver. Consequently, these biases will also be present in the GNSS code and phase measurements and may there affect the accuracy of positions and other quantities derived from the observations. For instance, biases affect the ability to resolve the integer ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP), and in relative carrier phase positioning when measurements from multiple GNSSs are used. In addition, code biases affect ionospheric modeling when the Total Electron Content is estimated from GNSS measurements. The paper illustrates how satellite phase biases inhibit the resolution of the phase ambiguity to an integer in PPP, while receiver phase biases affect multi-GNSS positioning. It is also discussed how biases in the receiver channels affect relative GLONASS positioning with baselines of mixed receiver types. In addition, the importance of code biases between signals modulated onto different carriers as is required for modeling the ionosphere from GNSS measurements is discussed. The origin of biases is discussed along with their effect on GNSS positioning, and descriptions of how biases can be estimated or in other ways handled in the positioning process are provided.QC 20170922</p

    Ionospheric Regional modeling Algorithm based on GNSS Precise Point Positioning

    Get PDF
    Precise point positioning (PPP) is an absolute spatial positioning technology different from carrier phase relative positioning. With the continuous development of Global navigation satellite system (GNSS), multi-constellation GNSS further provides PPP with more abundant observation information and useful spatial geometric observations, which improves positioning performance and robustness. In recent years, the un-difference and un-combined precise point positioning (UPPP) has been continuously developing. Firstly, we introduce the basic theory of GNSS positioning and compare the position performance between UPPP and ionospheric-free PPP (IF PPP). The positioning performance of the four mainstream GNSS systems, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and Beidou, the PPP floating-point solutions of the four satellite systems all converge within 60 minutes and their error are less than 10cm. Secondly, a two-dimensional (2-d) model is proposed to fit the vertical total electronic content (VTEC) in the ionosphere with the ionospheric delays extracted by UPPP. With the model constraining the ionospheric delay in UPPP, the convergence is 2 minutes shorter than using the global ionospheric map (GIM) from IGS. Thirdly, to solve the limitation of the traditional methods in 2d representation, a method is proposed represent the ionosphere in 3D, called Compressed Sensing Tomography (CST). Comparing the simulated single-difference slant total electron content (STEC) and the input single- difference STEC between satellites, the root mean square (RMS) of the reference stationโ€™s error is less than 1 TEC uni

    A Review on Precise Orbit Determination of Various LEO Satellites

    Get PDF
    The need for precise orbit determination (POD) has grown significantly due to the increased amount of space-based activities appearing at an accelerating pace. POD has a positive contribution in achieving the requirements of Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite mission which includes improved reliability and continuity. In this paper, we will review the POD approaches of various LEO satellites and discuss the accuracy levels obtained as well as the methods and algorithms used to achieve the POD of LEO satellites. With recent advancements in miniature space technology, a greater number of smaller low-cost satellites are launched into the LEO for various purposes. Furthermore, development in the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and chipsets played a vital role in revolutionizing the GNSS receiver technology. Lower-cost, smaller size but yet high performing GNSS receivers need to be implemented also in CubeSats in addition to the various terrestrial applications. POD using onboard GNSS receiver data will benefit the development of several upcoming space applications in the field of navigation systems, telecommunication, remote sensing, and earth observation. In the future, it is anticipated that LEO-based satellites enabled by POD can also offer positioning capabilities that will enhance GNSS and create vast opportunities for users with new features and possibilities to the navigation field.ยฉ 2021 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)fi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed

    Performance Assessment of GNSS Augmentation System Using Quasi-Zenith Satellite System for Real-time Precise Positioning Method in Indonesia

    Get PDF
    The Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) is one of the GNSS technologies owned by the Japanese government, which orbits around East Asia, Asia Pacific, and Oceania. One of the advantages of the QZSS satellite is that it corrects the measurements using precise ephemeris, clock, and other augmenting corrections, and is primarily used for the Real-Time Precise Point Positioning (RTPPP) method. This study aimed to examine the QZSS system\u27s performance for RTPPP measurements in Indonesia. Magellan System Japan\u27s (MSJ) receiver was applied to collect the GNSS and the augmenting data to perform the RTPPP. RTPPP method was then made into the static and kinematic scheme. Various methods were also carried out on each method, such as static, Real-Time Kinematic (RTK), and other RTPPP providers. The result is that the precision level of the RTPPP method for the static scheme using the QZSS augmentation could give precision up to 5 cm in the open sky condition. Similar to other RTPPP correction providers, QZSS-RTPPP took approximately 20 minutes for the initiation process. The Accuracy of QZSS-RTPPP reached approximately 20 cm caused by the epoch reference for the actual coordinate was in epoch 2012.0, while the RT-PPP observations were occupied in 2019. The precision and accuracy level of QZSS-RTPPP tend to be more unstable in light and heavy obstructed conditions. In the measurements against 20 benchmarks at ITB Jatinangor, the accuracy value for the QZSS-RTPPP ranged from 5-40 cm. The RTPPP QZSS method\u27s average accuracy for the easting, northing, and height components, respectively, was 0.110 m, 0.056 m, and 0.120 m. Utilizing the QZSS RTPPP measurements at sea for the moving platform, the obtained horizontal component precision level was between 10 and 20 cm. On the other hand, the overall precision for QZSS RTPPP measurement over the land region for the moving platform was lower than one meter for horizontal components, while the vertical component was lower than two meters

    Using GLONASS in Combined GNSS Receivers: Current Status

    Get PDF
    The paper focuses on using GLONASS in state-of-the-art combined GNSS (GPS/GLONASS) receivers. The launch of GLONASS-M satellite is an important event that opens new horizons for satellite navigation. Correspondingly, the description of advantages associated with new hardware and new navigation data of GLONASS-M satellites is given. Also, current status of GLONASS and plans of its modernization are considered. For combined use of GPS and GLONASS, interoperability issues that originate from differences in initial designing of both systems need to be resolved. It is demonstrated that such issues have been resolved at the level that meets all the practical needs. Also, there were interoperability issues connected with working in differential DGPS/RTK modes when RTCM messages served for broadcast DGPS/RTK data. It is shown that an appropriate solution has been found for each of those issues, thus the current version of RTCM standard is free of any GPS/GLONASS interoperability issues. Also, the materials on using GNSS receivers in different positioning modes are provided. Additional GLONASS satellites help in maintaining reliable RTK positioning under environments with limited visibility of satellites. At the same time, there are advantages associated with fast ambiguity resolution, detection and exclusion of anomalies etc. Also, questions related to precise GLONASS ephemerides and Network RTK applications are considered. Finally, a summary of advantages of GNSS receivers (that will support Galileo as well) over GPS-only receivers is given. Reprinted with permission from The Institute of Navigation (http://ion.org/) and The Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, (pp. 1046-1057). Fairfax, VA: The Institute of Navigation
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore