Monoidal computer III: A coalgebraic view of computability and complexity

Monoidal computer is a categorical model of intensional computation, where many different programs correspond to the same input-output behavior. The upshot of yet another model of computation is that a categorical formalism should provide a much needed high level language for theory of computation, flexible enough to allow abstracting away the low level implementation details when they are irrelevant, or taking them into account when they are genuinely needed. A salient feature of the approach through monoidal categories is the formal graphical language of string diagrams, which supports visual reasoning about programs and computations. In the present paper, we provide a coalgebraic characterization of monoidal computer. It turns out that the availability of interpreters and specializers, that make a monoidal category into a monoidal computer, is equivalent with the existence of a *universal state space*, that carries a weakly final state machine for any pair of input and output types. Being able to program state machines in monoidal computers allows us to represent Turing machines, to capture their execution, count their steps, as well as, e.g., the memory cells that they use. The coalgebraic view of monoidal computer thus provides a convenient diagrammatic language for studying computability and complexity.Comment: 34 pages, 24 figures; in this version: added the Appendi

Repetitive Reduction Patterns in Lambda Calculus with letrec (Work in Progress)

For the lambda-calculus with letrec we develop an optimisation, which is based on the contraction of a certain class of 'future' (also: virtual) redexes. In the implementation of functional programming languages it is common practice to perform beta-reductions at compile time whenever possible in order to produce code that requires fewer reductions at run time. This is, however, in principle limited to redexes and created redexes that are 'visible' (in the sense that they can be contracted without the need for unsharing), and cannot generally be extended to redexes that are concealed by sharing constructs such as letrec. In the case of recursion, concealed redexes become visible only after unwindings during evaluation, and then have to be contracted time and again. We observe that in some cases such redexes exhibit a certain form of repetitive behaviour at run time. We describe an analysis for identifying binders that give rise to such repetitive reduction patterns, and eliminate them by a sort of predictive contraction. Thereby these binders are lifted out of recursive positions or eliminated altogether, as a result alleviating the amount of beta-reductions required for each recursive iteration. Both our analysis and simplification are suitable to be integrated into existing compilers for functional programming languages as an additional optimisation phase. With this work we hope to contribute to increasing the efficiency of executing programs written in such languages.Comment: In Proceedings TERMGRAPH 2011, arXiv:1102.226

Compiling Actions by Partial Evaluation, Revisited

We revisit Bondorf and Palsberg's compilation of actions using< the offline syntax-directed partial evaluator Similix (FPCA'93, JFP'96), and we compare it in detail with using an online type-directed partial evaluator. In contrast to Similix, our type-directed partial evaluator is idempotent and requires no "binding-time improvements." It also appears to consume about 7 times less space and to be about 28 times faster than Similix, and to yield residual programs that are perceptibly more efficient than those generated by Similix

A Semantic analysis of control

This thesis examines the use of denotational semantics to reason about control flow in sequential, basically functional languages. It extends recent work in game semantics, in which programs are interpreted as strategies for computation by interaction with an environment. Abramsky has suggested that an intensional hierarchy of computational features such as state, and their fully abstract models, can be captured as violations of the constraints on strategies in the basic functional model. Non-local control flow is shown to fit into this framework as the violation of strong and weak `bracketing' conditions, related to linear behaviour. The language muPCF (Parigot's mu_lambda with constants and recursion) is adopted as a simple basis for higher-type, sequential computation with access to the flow of control. A simple operational semantics for both call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation is described. It is shown that dropping the bracketing condition on games models of PCF yields fully abstract models of muPCF. The games models of muPCF are instances of a general construction based on a continuations monad on Fam(C), where C is a rational cartesian closed category with infinite products. Computational adequacy, definability and full abstraction can then be captured by simple axioms on C. The fully abstract and universal models of muPCF are shown to have an effective presentation in the category of Berry-Curien sequential algorithms. There is further analysis of observational equivalence, in the form of a context lemma, and a characterization of the unique functor from the (initial) games model, which is an isomorphism on its (fully abstract) quotient. This establishes decidability of observational equivalence for finitary muPCF, contrasting with the undecidability of the analogous relation in pure PCF

A HOL basis for reasoning about functional programs

Domain theory is the mathematical theory underlying denotational semantics. This thesis presents a formalization of domain theory in the Higher Order Logic (HOL) theorem proving system along with a mechanization of proof functions and other tools to support reasoning about the denotations of functional programs. By providing a fixed point operator for functions on certain domains which have a special undefined (bottom) element, this extension of HOL supports the definition of recursive functions which are not also primitive recursive. Thus, it provides an approach to the long-standing and important problem of defining non-primitive recursive functions in the HOL system. Our philosophy is that there must be a direct correspondence between elements of complete partial orders (domains) and elements of HOL types, in order to allow the reuse of higher order logic and proof infrastructure already available in the HOL system. Hence, we are able to mix domain theoretic reasoning with reasoning in the set theoretic HOL world to advantage, exploiting HOL types and tools directly. Moreover, by mixing domain and set theoretic reasoning, we are able to eliminate almost all reasoning about the bottom element of complete partial orders that makes the LCF theorem prover, which supports a first order logic of domain theory, difficult and tedious to use. A thorough comparison with LCF is provided. The advantages of combining the best of the domain and set theoretic worlds in the same system are demonstrated in a larger example, showing the correctness of a unification algorithm. A major part of the proof is conducted in the set theoretic setting of higher order logic, and only at a late stage of the proof domain theory is introduced to give a recursive definition of the algorithm, which is not primitive recursive. Furthermore, a total well-founded recursive unification function can be defined easily in pure HOL by proving that the unification algorithm (defined in domain theory) always terminates; this proof is conducted by a non-trivial well-founded induction. In such applications, where non-primitive recursive HOL functions are defined via domain theory and a proof of termination, domain theory constructs only appear temporarily