Can k-NN imputation improve the performance of C4.5 with small software project data sets? A comparative evaluation

Missing data is a widespread problem that can affect the ability to use data to construct effective prediction systems. We investigate a common machine learning technique that can tolerate missing values, namely C4.5, to predict cost using six real world software project databases. We analyze the predictive performance after using the k-NN missing data imputation technique to see if it is better to tolerate missing data or to try to impute missing values and then apply the C4.5 algorithm. For the investigation, we simulated three missingness mechanisms, three missing data patterns, and five missing data percentages. We found that the k-NN imputation can improve the prediction accuracy of C4.5. At the same time, both C4.5 and k-NN are little affected by the missingness mechanism, but that the missing data pattern and the missing data percentage have a strong negative impact upon prediction (or imputation) accuracy particularly if the missing data percentage exceeds 40%

Ensemble missing data techniques for software effort prediction

Constructing an accurate effort prediction model is a challenge in software engineering. The development and validation of models that are used for prediction tasks require good quality data. Unfortunately, software engineering datasets tend to suffer from the incompleteness which could result to inaccurate decision making and project management and implementation. Recently, the use of machine learning algorithms has proven to be of great practical value in solving a variety of software engineering problems including software prediction, including the use of ensemble (combining) classifiers. Research indicates that ensemble individual classifiers lead to a significant improvement in classification performance by having them vote for the most popular class. This paper proposes a method for improving software effort prediction accuracy produced by a decision tree learning algorithm and by generating the ensemble using two imputation methods as elements. Benchmarking results on ten industrial datasets show that the proposed ensemble strategy has the potential to improve prediction accuracy compared to an individual imputation method, especially if multiple imputation is a component of the ensemble

Effective techniques for handling incomplete data using decision trees

Decision Trees (DTs) have been recognized as one of the most successful formalisms for knowledge representation and reasoning and are currently applied to a variety of data mining or knowledge discovery applications, particularly for classification problems. There are several efficient methods to learn a DT from data. However, these methods are often limited to the assumption that data are complete. In this thesis, some contributions to the field of machine learning and statistics that solve the problem of extracting DTs for learning and classification tasks from incomplete databases are presented. The methodology underlying the thesis blends together well-established statistical theories with the most advanced techniques for machine learning and automated reasoning with uncertainty. The first contribution is the extensive simulations which study the impact of missing data on predictive accuracy of existing DTs which can cope with missing values, when missing values are in both the training and test sets or when they are in either of the two sets. All simulations are performed under missing completely at random, missing at random and informatively missing mechanisms and for different missing data patterns and proportions. The proposal of a simple, novel, yet effective proposed procedure for training and testing using decision trees in the presence of missing data is the next contribution. Original and simple splitting criteria for attribute selection in tree building are put forward. The proposed technique is evaluated and validated in empirical tests over many real world application domains. In this work, the proposed algorithm maintains (sometimes exceeds) the outstanding accuracy of multiple imputation, especially on datasets containing mixed attributes and purely nominal attributes. Also, the proposed algorithm greatly improves in accuracy for IM data. Another major advantage of this method over multiple imputation is the important saving in computational resources due to it simplicity. The next contribution is the proposal of three versions of simple probabilistic techniques that could be used for classifying incomplete vectors using decision trees based on complete data. The proposed procedure is superficially similar to that of fractional cases but more effective. The experimental results demonstrate that these approaches can achieve comparative quality to sophisticated algorithms like multiple imputation and therefore are applicable to all kinds of datasets. Finally, novel uses of two proposed ensemble procedures for handling incomplete training and test data are proposed and discussed. The algorithms combine the two best approaches either with resampling (REMIMIA) or without resampling (EMIMIA) of the training data before growing the decision trees. Experiments are used to evaluate and validate the success of the proposed ensemble methods with respect to individual missing data techniques in the form of empirical tests. EMIMIA attains the highest overall level of prediction accuracy

The 1990 progress report and future plans

This document describes the progress and plans of the Artificial Intelligence Research Branch (RIA) at ARC in 1990. Activities span a range from basic scientific research to engineering development and to fielded NASA applications, particularly those applications that are enabled by basic research carried out at RIA. Work is conducted in-house and through collaborative partners in academia and industry. Our major focus is on a limited number of research themes with a dual commitment to technical excellence and proven applicability to NASA short, medium, and long-term problems. RIA acts as the Agency's lead organization for research aspects of artificial intelligence, working closely with a second research laboratory at JPL and AI applications groups at all NASA centers