40 research outputs found

    The Quantum Mechanics of Two Interacting Realities

    Get PDF
    We consider how two physical realities can be represented over a common set of spacetime coordinates. As an example we will utilize quantum electrodynamics since this is a familiar and well-understood theory. We will designate one world the 'red' one and the other the 'green' one. We will try to show how they can interact in a physically plausible way. We will also examine whether such an interacting theory is renormalizable. It will be shown that we can extend these ideas to the Standard Model. There are implications for this theory if we consider General Relativity and these will be discussed briefly

    The Quantum Mechanics of Two Interacting Realities

    Get PDF
    We consider how two physical realities can be represented over a common set of spacetime coordinates. As an example we will utilize quantum electrodynamics since this is a familiar and well-understood theory. We will designate one world the 'red' one and the other the 'green' one. We will try to show how they can interact in a physically plausible way. We will also examine whether such an interacting theory is renormalizable. It will be shown that we can extend these ideas to the Standard Model. There are implications for this theory if we consider General Relativity and these will be discussed briefly

    Graph Theory

    Get PDF
    [no abstract available

    The Quantum Mechanics of Two Interacting Realities

    Get PDF
    We consider how two physical realities can be represented over a common set of spacetime coordinates. As an example we will utilize quantum electrodynamics since this is a familiar and well-understood theory. We will designate one world the 'red' one and the other the 'green' one. We will try to show how they can interact in a physically plausible way. We will also examine whether such an interacting theory is renormalizable. It will be shown that we can extend these ideas to the Standard Model. There are implications for this theory if we consider General Relativity and these will be discussed briefly. If there are, in fact, such other realities these could provide a plausible explanation for dark matter

    Neti-Neti-Onomasiological Onerousness And E Pluribus Unum La Escallonia Adventitious Ad Infinitum Model

    Get PDF
    In knowledge, there are logical contradictions and a logical incompatibilities, divergential affirmation and dialectic transformation. Brahmn is not the universe, nor sky, nor senses, nor mind. By Brahman we understand the one agency that stimulates the human being in to action. Good. And Anti Brahman is a part of Brahman and this is the agency of stimulus response of individuals based on their Rajas and Tamás equilibrium or proportion of disequilibrium (Kind attention drawn to the author’s articles on the subject matter. And we have to recapitulate the bank example given wherein the conservativeness generalisationality do not abnegate or revoke applicability to the individual systems which are conservation or which might be unconservational,like in self transformational, system mutational, syllogistically disintegrational, configurationally changeable. Anti Brahman stimulates one to do bad things. All individual records of commission and omission of Gratification or deprivation to others are assumed to be recorded in Neuron DNA (in space). We will not repeat this explanation again and holds good for the entire monograph. Separate Papers are written (Free will and Destiny, Natures general Ledger, A Model for God etc.,) and bad. This depends on freewill and destiny. We have already defined freewill as the in discretionary usage of power be it financial embezzlement, pecuniary misappropriation or fiscal defalcation. The other person might have been desensitized for such actions and might have been taught by reference groups (See Merton) to take things in his “stride”. But our General Ledger of all actionable and actions accounts. The General Ledger is the General Theory Of all actions of all individual human beings. It is also assumed that the reactionary potentiality depends on the genes (See Neurobiology by John Smith). This is a very important aspect not to be overlooked. Because Schrodinger’s equation is applicable to general system of the Universe, it does not mean its inapplicability to individual systems and the conservativeness and /or non conservativeness notwithstanding. In consideration to the fact that we have already built a model encompassing Brahman-Anti Brahman, Rajas-Tamás, we shall not include this in the model. Instead we take “Neti Neti concept” by its representation in the Schrodinger’s form (See Penrose on Schrödinger’s cat) and stimulus-response as the further constituents to tie up with the cosmic thread. One sentence about association need be said. Einstein said that matter is the one that gives rise to space time world lines. In our case human beings with their pen chance, predilections, proclivities, and propensities “svabhava” are responsible for the world lines of space time. The characteristics we have already stated depend on Rajas-Tamás-Sattva combination of the individual (all the three qualities are in the individual and in disequilibrium state, albeit we are not sure about the conservativeness of the states holistically. This we have codified in the General Ledger which is the General Theory of actions in the Universe. So we have the structure of space and time is determined by “Svabhava”. Like they say: “That area is not OK”. This is true of all characteristics, inertia, static, dynamic (Rajas, Tamás, Sattva means those words). These are most salient and perennial concepts that are to be remembered in the read of monograph.  This is ‘neti/ neti’ process, repeating which one becomes thoughtless. In jnana the entire world is illusory like a dream; only Brahmn is real- ‘Brahma satya jagat mithya.’ The world is neither unreal nor real. This means that reality is equivalent to unreality. Here let us go by the usual definition of “reality” and “unreality”. Unreality is pathological. Many philosophers like Constantine and Lester have said, it is schizophrenics who are suffering from the Truth. we shall marginalize the proposition in so fact as the study of monograph is concerned. This implies that Unreality is a part of reality. Further we assume that Objective reality and subjective experience are necessary to realize the Truth. Lest probably a courtesan would have become “enlightened” or a Professor had attained “Nirvikalpa Samadhi”. The world is mere projection of self. Jnana requires strong discriminating ability. Krishna says, “It is more difficult to realize the formless God than One with form”. We reiterate that formlessness is nothing but more than mere loss of style and substance and is well within space time. This is “subjective experience “most recruitment agency calls for. You can see without staring, and can hear without cupping your ears. Dealings with fellow people, bonhomie, and joie de vivre are the ones that could tackle a tricky situation involving a belligerent, cantankerous and recalcitrant person. Here the importance of zero is to be emphasized.” Experience “is nothing but the “experience” so assiduously and avidly asked by recruiter agencies while they recruit people. When they say that whether you know the proficiency in anagrammatism like addition, subtraction, multiplication, division And may be differentiation and integration, which a probationer does, but something more, a knack to deal with people, know them, adjustable temperament, which comes by subjective experience. Both “Objective Reality” and “Subjective Experience” are necessary for the determination of Truth. And Schrödinger and Wagner have said that Truth is always elusive. That we state in Model form. It is not “emptiness”, but “Nothing” which is zero. And this zero is the cancellation of two opposite terms or particle-antiparticle duality, and the zyphera that is written with so much of gusto and aplomb in every equation. An equation equivalent to zero means that all the constituents cancel out each other in some form. We shall for our purpose choose one permutation and combination. It is to be mentioned in this connection that waking state is one of the three states of dream state and dreamless state and space time is only projection on the screen of consciousness (which we have defined as collection of all knowledge –individuals-his peer group references, belief systems etc., including visual representations, with anagrammatic mind acting on its to fabricate concoct realistic, consistent, surrealistic, unreal dreams and actual “thinking”. Like a movie being watched. Mind doth act upon it and weaves a web like a spider. Lastly we state that “association’ is the part and parcel of space and time and once taught. The “association” fails to leave you. Even eminent scientists fall prey for this defending their theories till the end instead of applying their minds to the twists their own theories have taken. This statement is made in a dispassionate manner of witness consciousness and not participatory consciousness. When over thinking about association takes place in the spatio temporal actualization of events it becomes pathological. Be it love, murder, mayhem, we have various psychiatric cases. And we want to “renormalize them”. So there is reality, surrealism, unreality, inconsistencies, contradictions in the waking state, dream state-note you experience in dream state also- and dreamless state.

    Topological Code Architectures for Quantum Computation

    Get PDF
    This dissertation is concerned with quantum computation using many-body quantum systems encoded in topological codes. The interest in these topological systems has increased in recent years as devices in the lab begin to reach the fidelities required for performing arbitrarily long quantum algorithms. The most well-studied system, Kitaev\u27s toric code, provides both a physical substrate for performing universal fault-tolerant quantum computations and a useful pedagogical tool for explaining the way other topological codes work. In this dissertation, I first review the necessary formalism for quantum information and quantum stabilizer codes, and then I introduce two families of topological codes: Kitaev\u27s toric code and Bombin\u27s color codes. I then present three chapters of original work. First, I explore the distinctness of encoding schemes in the color codes. Second, I introduce a model of quantum computation based on the toric code that uses adiabatic interpolations between static Hamiltonians with gaps constant in the system size. Lastly, I describe novel state distillation protocols that are naturally suited for topological architectures and show that they provide resource savings in terms of the number of required ancilla states when compared to more traditional approaches to quantum gate approximation

    Soft Processing Techniques for Quantum Key Distribution Applications

    Get PDF
    This thesis deals with soft-information based information reconciliation and data sifting for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). A novel composite channel model for QKD is identified, which includes both a hard output quantum channel and a soft output classic channel. The Log-Likelihood Ratios, - also called soft-metrics - derived from the two channels are jointly processed at the receiver, exploiting capacity achieving soft-metric based iteratively decoded block codes. The performance of the proposed mixed-soft-metric algorithms are studied via simulations as a function of the system parameters. The core ideas of the thesis are employing Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding as opposed to two-way communication for information reconciliation in QKD schemes, exploiting all the available information for data processing at the receiver including information available from the quantum channel, since optimized use of this information can lead to significant performance improvement, and providing a security versus secret-key rate trade-off to the end-user within the context of QKD systems

    Scientific Progress on the Semantic View : An Account of Scientific Progress as Objective Logical and Empirical Strength Increments

    Get PDF
    The aim of this master thesis is to make a convincing argument that scientific progress can be spoken of in objective terms. In order to make this argument I will propose a philosophical theory of scientific progress. Two concepts will be constructed with this aim in mind, both which are types of strength measures on scientific theories. The first concept, that of logical strength, pertains to the way a theory may exclude, or permit less, model classes compared to another theory. The second concept, that of empirical strength, pertains to an objective measure of the informational content of data models, defined in terms of Kolmogorov complexity. This latter idea stems from communication and computational theory. Scientific progress is then defined as the interaction, or the stepwise increases, of these two strength measures. Central for the conception of a scientific theory is the philosophical framework known as The Semantic View of Scientific Theories. This view can briefly be characterized as an empirical extension of Tarskian model-theory. Another central notion for this theory of scientific progress is the philosophical or metaphysical thesis called structural realism. Both will accordingly be explained and argued for. Finally, as a test on this proposed theory of scientific progress, it will be applied to two examples of theory transition from the history of physical theory. I conclude that the proposed theory handles these two cases well

    The Topos-theoretical Approach to Quantum Physics

    Get PDF
    I oppgaven tas det sikte på å anvende begreper og metoder fra kategoriteori og især toposteori innen kvantefysikken. I den resulterende teorien, "toposfysikk", brukes toposteori (teorien om generaliserte mengdeuniverser og generaliserte rom) som et verktøy for å konstruere kvantefysikken ved å "lime sammen" klassiske perspektiver eller "snapshots". Første kapitel gir den nødvendige bakgrunn for å forstå den fysiske motivasjonen bak konstruksjonene i de påfølgende kapitler, med særlig oppmerksomhet viet emnene logikk, kvantisering og rom. I kapitel 2 presenteres først elementær teori om kategorier og topoi. Det gis deretter en gjennomgang av toposfysikkens sentrale trekk: konstruksjonen av et tilstandsrom for kvantemekanikken ved hjelp av (kovariante eller kontravariante) funktorer over en kategori av kommutative operatoralgebraer. To ulike tilnærmingsmåter, Andreas Döring og Chris Ishams "neorealisme" og Chris Heunen, Nicolas P. Landsmaan og Bas Spitters "Bohrifikasjon" presenteres i detalj. I kapitel 3 anvendes den sistnevnte tilnærmingen på teorien om "loop quantum gravity" (LQG). Kapitelet har derfor en kort oppsummering av hovedresultatene innen LQG. Det undersøkes hvordan LQG kan interpreteres innen toposfysikk ved å ta i bruk Christian Fleischhacks formulering av LQG som en Weylalgebra. De topologiske egenskapene til tilstandsrommet i LQG innen toposmodellen undersøkes, og det vises hvordan kravene til gauge- og diffeomorfiinvarians kan interpreteres i teorien. Endelig, ved hjelp av Ishams teknikk for å kvantisere generelle strukturer, utvides den toposfysiske modellen til å inkludere et bredere kategoriteoretisk rammeverk. Vi definerer en målteori for kategorier og undersøker teoriens byggesteiner, pilfeltene over en kategori, i kategorien av deres representasjoner. Vi antyder hvordan modellen kan anvendes innen Sorkins teori om kausale mengder, og som basis for en teori om kvantisert logikk
    corecore