Advances in Parallel-Stage Decoupled Software Pipelining Leveraging Loop Distribution, Stream-Computing and the SSA Form

8 pages Categories and Subject Descriptors D.3.4 [Programming Languages]: Processors-Compilers, OptimizationInternational audienceDecoupled Software Pipelining (DSWP) is a program partitioning method enabling compilers to extract pipeline parallelism from sequential programs. Parallel Stage DSWP (PS-DSWP) is an extension that also exploits the data parallelism within pipeline filters. This paper presents the preliminary design of a new PS-DSWP method capable of handling arbitrary structured control flow, a slightly better algorithmic complexity, the natural exploitation of nested parallelism with communications across arbitrary levels, with a seamless integration with data-flow parallel programming environments. It is inspired by loop-distribution and supports nested/structured partitioning along with the hierarchy of control dependences. The method relies on a data-flow streaming extension of OpenMP. These advances are made possible thanks to progresses in compiler intermediate representation. We describe our usage of the Static Single Assignment (SSA) form, how we extend it to the context of concurrent streaming tasks, and we discuss the benefits and challenges for PS-DSWP

Factoring out ordered sections to expose thread-level parallelism

With the rise of multi-core processors, researchers are taking a new look at extending the applicability auto-parallelization techniques. In this paper, we identify a dependence pattern on which autoparallelization currently fails. This dependence pattern occurs for ordered sections, i.e. code fragments in a loop that must be executed atomically and in original program order. We discuss why these ordered sections prohibit current auto-parallelizers from working and we present a technique to deal with them. We experimentally demonstrate the efficacy of the technique, yielding significant overall program speedups

Paralelização de laços doacross usando anotações de componentes e probabilidade de Loop-Carried

Orientadores: Guido Costa Souza de Araújo, Márcio Machado PereiraDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de ComputaçãoResumo: A paralelização de laços é usada para se obter melhor desempenho em algoritmos intensivos, entretando, não são todos os laços que podem ser facilmente paralelizados. Os laços chamados de DOACROSS possuem dependências entre iterações, i.e. uma iteração calcula um dado que é usado por outra iteração futura. Este tipo de dependência é chamada de loop-carried e não pode ser paralelizada trivialmente porque a ordem de execução das iterações deve ser respeitada. Algumas técnicas podem ser usadas para paralelizar este tipo de laço, porém o programador deve entender como funciona o algoritmo e deve escolher quais instruções podem ser executadas em paralelo e quais instruções devem ser executadas sequencialmente. Estas componentes sequenciais e paralelas precisam ser separadas manualmente pelo programador e a comunicação entre as componentes deve ser incluída, a fim de respeitar as dependências entre componentes e as dependências entre iterações. Implementar essas técnicas é um trabalho laborioso que requer uma certa experiência do programador para separar as componentes e encontrar as dependências para implementar a comunicação entre as componentes/threads. Esta comunicação pode ser feita através de filas ou buffers, dependendo do algoritmo de paralelização escolhido. Uma das técnicas de paralelização é o algoritmo mais tradicional, chamado de DOACROSS que foi implementado no OpenMP 4.5 através da cláusula depend da diretiva ordered. Este pragma deve ser usado dentro da região de um laço paralelo do OpenMP a fim de separar as componentes que devem ser sequenciais. A comunicação e a sincronização são implementadas automaticamente utilizando a biblioteca de runtime do OpenMP. Este método remove do programador o trabalho de programação, entretando, ainda é necessário delimitar explicitamente as componentes sequenciais. Outro algoritmo de paralelização estudado foi o Batched DoAcross (BDX). Este algoritmo pode ser usado para reduzir o overhead da comunicação entre componentes, entretanto, a implementação deve ser feita manualmente pelo programador e requer que o programador separe as componentes sequenciais e paralelas, crie barreiras de sincronização para as componentes sequenciais, crie buffers para a comunicação entre componentes e crie variáveis compartilhadas para a comunicação entre as threads (dependências entre iterações). Nos experimentos, foi percebido que a escolha do algoritmo de paralelização depende de alguns fatores, i.e. a estrutura do algoritmo, a proporção das dependências entre iterações, o número de iterações do laço e o tamanho do laço. Foi criada então uma nova cláusula para o OpenMP que, quando usada juntamente com a diretiva ordered, consegue separar as componentes sequenciais e paralelas e implementar essas técnicas de forma automática. Esta cláusula, chamada de use, deve receber um parâmetro que especifica qual técnica o programador quer utilizar para paralelizar o laçoAbstract: Loop parallelization can be used to achieve better performance on intensive algorithms, however, not all loops can be easily parallelized. The called 'DOACROSS' loops have dependences between different iterations, i.e. some iteration computes a data which is used in a later iteration. This kind of dependence is called loop-carried dependence and cannot be simply parallelized because iterations execution order must be respected. Some techniques can be used to parallelize this kind of loop, however, the programmer must understand how the algorithm works and choose which instructions can be executed in parallel and which instructions need to be serialized. These serial and parallel components need to be manually separated by programmer and communication between components must be included to respect dependences inside loop body and between threads to respect loop-carried dependences. Implementing these techniques is a laborious work that requires a certain expertise from programmer to separate loop components and find dependences to implement communication between components/threads. This communication can be done by using a queue or a buffer, depending on the algorithm used to parallelize. One of these parallelization techniques is the traditional DOACROSS, which was implemented by using depend clause for the ordered directive in OpenMP 4.5. This OpenMP construct is used within OpenMP loop region to separate serial and parallel components, then, communication and synchronization are automatically implemented by OpenMP Runtime. This method removes most of the programming work from the programmer, however still requires to explicitly delimit serial region. Another studied parallelization technique is the Batched DoAcross (BDX). This algorithm can be used to reduce the communication overhead of synchronization between components, however, the implementation must be done manually by programmer, which requires for the programmer to separate serial and parallel components, create barriers to synchronization in serial components, create buffers for communication between components and create the shared variables for communication between threads (loop-carried dependences). In our experiments, we noticed that some factors must be taken for the choice of parallelization technique, i.e. algorithm structure, loop-carried ratio, number of loop iterations and loop size. We created a new OpenMP clause that, used together with the ordered directive, can separate these components and implement these techniques automatically. This clause, is called use, receive a parameter for specifying which parallelization technique the programmer want to be implementedMestradoCiência da ComputaçãoMestre em Ciência da Computaçã

Advances in Parallel-Stage Decoupled Software Pipelining

Decoupled Software Pipelining (DSWP) is a program partitioning method enabling compilers to extract pipeline parallelism from sequential programs. Parallel Stage DSWP (PS-DSWP) is an extension that also exploits the data parallelism within pipeline filters. This paper presents the preliminary design of a new PS-DSWP method capable of handling arbitrary structured control flow, a slightly better algorithmic complexity, the natural exploitation of nested parallelism with communications across arbitrary levels, with a seamless integration with data-flow parallel programming environments. It is inspired by loop-distribution and supports nested/structured partitioning along with the hierarchy of control dependences. The method relies on a data-flow streaming extension of OpenMP. These advances are made possible thanks to progresses in compiler intermediate representation. We describe our usage of the Static Single Assignment (SSA) form, how we extend it to the context of concurrent streaming tasks, and we discuss the benefits and challenges for PS-DSWP

A Novel Compiler Support for Automatic Parallelization on Multicore Systems

[Abstract] The widespread use of multicore processors is not a consequence of significant advances in parallel programming. In contrast, multicore processors arise due to the complexity of building power-efficient, high-clock-rate, single-core chips. Automatic parallelization of sequential applications is the ideal solution for making parallel programming as easy as writing programs for sequential computers. However, automatic parallelization remains a grand challenge due to its need for complex program analysis and the existence of unknowns during compilation. This paper proposes a new method for converting a sequential application into a parallel counterpart that can be executed on current multicore processors. It hinges on an intermediate representation based on the concept of domain-independent kernel (e.g., assignment, reduction, recurrence). Such kernel-centric view hides the complexity of the implementation details, enabling the construction of the parallel version even when the source code of the sequential application contains different syntactic variations of the computations (e.g., pointers, arrays, complex control flows). Experiments that evaluate the effectiveness and performance of our approach with respect to state-of-the-art compilers are also presented. The benchmark suite consists of synthetic codes that represent common domain-independent kernels, dense/sparse linear algebra and image processing routines, and full-scale applications from SPEC CPU2000.[Resumen] El uso generalizado de procesadores multinúcleo no es consecuencia de avances significativos en programación paralela. Por el contrario, los procesadores multinúcleo surgen debido a la complejidad de construir chips mononúcleo que sean eficiente energéticamente y tengan altas velocidades de reloj. La paralelización automática de aplicaciones secuenciales es la solución ideal para hacer la programación paralela tan fácil como escribir programas para ordenadores secuenciales. Sin embargo, la paralelización automática continua a ser un gran reto debido a su necesidad de complejos análisis del programa y la existencia de incógnitas durante la compilación. Este artículo propone un nuevo método para convertir una aplicación secuencial en su contrapartida paralela que pueda ser ejecutada en los procesadores multinúcleo actuales. Este método depende de una representación intermedia basada en el concepto de núcleos independientes del dominio (p. ej., asignación, reducción, recurrencia). Esta visión centrada en núcleos oculta la complejidad de los detalles de implementación, permitiendo la construcción de la versión paralela incluso cuando el código fuente de la aplicación secuencial contiene diferentes variantes de las computaciones (p. ej., punteros, arrays, flujos de control complejos). Se presentan experimentos que evalúan la efectividad y el rendimiento de nuestra aproximación con respecto al estado del arte. La serie programas de prueba consiste en códigos sintéticos que representan núcleos independientes del dominio comunes, rutinas de álgebra lineal densa/dispersa y de procesamiento de imagen, y aplicaciones completas del SPEC CPU2000.[Resumo] O uso xeralizado de procesadores multinúcleo non é consecuencia de avances significativos en programación paralela. Pola contra, os procesadores multinúcleo xurden debido á complexidade de construir chips mononúcleo que sexan eficientes enerxéticamente e teñan altas velocidades de reloxo. A paralelización automática de aplicacións secuenciais é a solución ideal para facer a programación paralela tan sinxela como escribir programas para ordenadores secuenciais. Sen embargo, a paralelización automática continua a ser un gran reto debido a súa necesidade de complexas análises do programa e a existencia de incógnitas durante a compilación. Este artigo propón un novo método para convertir unha aplicación secuencias na súa contrapartida paralela que poida ser executada nos procesadores multinúcleo actuais. Este método depende dunha representación intermedia baseada no concepto dos núcleos independentes do dominio (p. ex., asignación, reducción, recurrencia). Esta visión centrada en núcleos oculta a complexidade dos detalles de implementación, permitindo a construcción da versión paralela incluso cando o código fonte da aplicación secuencial contén diferentes variantes das computacións (p. ex., punteiros, arrays, fluxos de control complejo). Preséntanse experimentos que evalúan a efectividade e o rendemento da nosa aproximación con respecto ao estado da arte. A serie de programas de proba consiste en códigos sintéticos que representan núcleos independentes do dominio comunes, rutinas de álxebra lineal densa/dispersa e de procesamento de imaxe, e aplicacións completas do SPEC CPU2000.Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; TIN2010-16735Ministerio de Educación y Cultura; AP2008-0101

AutopaR: An Automatic Parallelization Tool for Recursive Calls

Manycore systems are becoming more and more powerful with the integration of hundreds of cores on a single chip. However, writing parallel programs on these manycore systems has become a problem since the amount of available parallel tools and applications are limited. Although exploiting parallelism in software is possible, it requires different design decisions, significant programmer effort and is error prone. Different libraries and tools try to make the transition to parallelism easier, however there is no concrete system to make it transparent to software developer. To this end, our proposed tool is a step forward to improve the current state. Our approach, Autopar, specifically aims at achieving automatic parallelization of recursive applications using static program analysis. It first decides on the recursive functions of a given program. Then, it performs analysis and collects information about these recursive functions. Our analysis module automatically collects program information without requiring any modification in the program design or developer involvement. Finally, it achieves automatic parallelization by introducing necessary OpenMP pragmas in appropriate places in the application. © 2014 IEEE

Interactive Trace-Based Analysis Toolset for Manual Parallelization of C Programs

Massive amounts of legacy sequential code need to be parallelized to make better use of modern multiprocessor architectures. Nevertheless, writing parallel programs is still a difficult task. Automated parallelization methods can be effective both at the statement and loop levels and, recently, at the task level, but they are still restricted to specific source code constructs or application domains. We present in this article an innovative toolset that supports developers when performing manual code analysis and parallelization decisions. It automatically collects and represents the program profile and data dependencies in an interactive graphical format that facilitates the analysis and discovery of manual parallelization opportunities. The toolset can be used for arbitrary sequential C programs and parallelization patterns. Also, its program-scope data dependency tracing at runtime can complement the tools based on static code analysis and can also benefit from it at the same time. We also tested the effectiveness of the toolset in terms of time to reach parallelization decisions and of their quality. We measured a significant improvement for several real-world representative applications

Profile-driven parallelisation of sequential programs

Traditional parallelism detection in compilers is performed by means of static analysis and more specifically data and control dependence analysis. The information that is available at compile time, however, is inherently limited and therefore restricts the parallelisation opportunities. Furthermore, applications written in C – which represent the majority of today’s scientific, embedded and system software – utilise many lowlevel features and an intricate programming style that forces the compiler to even more conservative assumptions. Despite the numerous proposals to handle this uncertainty at compile time using speculative optimisation and parallelisation, the software industry still lacks any pragmatic approaches that extracts coarse-grain parallelism to exploit the multiple processing units of modern commodity hardware. This thesis introduces a novel approach for extracting and exploiting multiple forms of coarse-grain parallelism from sequential applications written in C. We utilise profiling information to overcome the limitations of static data and control-flow analysis enabling more aggressive parallelisation. Profiling is performed using an instrumentation scheme operating at the Intermediate Representation (Ir) level of the compiler. In contrast to existing approaches that depend on low-level binary tools and debugging information, Ir-profiling provides precise and direct correlation of profiling information back to the Ir structures of the compiler. Additionally, our approach is orthogonal to existing automatic parallelisation approaches and additional fine-grain parallelism may be exploited. We demonstrate the applicability and versatility of the proposed methodology using two studies that target different forms of parallelism. First, we focus on the exploitation of loop-level parallelism that is abundant in many scientific and embedded applications. We evaluate our parallelisation strategy against the Nas and Spec Fp benchmarks and two different multi-core platforms (a shared-memory Intel Xeon Smp and a heterogeneous distributed-memory Ibm Cell blade). Empirical evaluation shows that our approach not only yields significant improvements when compared with state-of- the-art parallelising compilers, but comes close to and sometimes exceeds the performance of manually parallelised codes. On average, our methodology achieves 96% of the performance of the hand-tuned parallel benchmarks on the Intel Xeon platform, and a significant speedup for the Cell platform. The second study, addresses the problem of partially sequential loops, typically found in implementations of multimedia codecs. We develop a more powerful whole-program representation based on the Program Dependence Graph (Pdg) that supports profiling, partitioning and codegeneration for pipeline parallelism. In addition we demonstrate how this enhances conventional pipeline parallelisation by incorporating support for multi-level loops and pipeline stage replication in a uniform and automatic way. Experimental results using a set of complex multimedia and stream processing benchmarks confirm the effectiveness of the proposed methodology that yields speedups up to 4.7 on a eight-core Intel Xeon machine

Runtime-adaptive generalized task parallelism

Multi core systems are ubiquitous nowadays and their number is ever increasing. And while, limited by physical constraints, the computational power of the individual cores has been stagnating or even declining for years, a solution to effectively utilize the computational power that comes with the additional cores is yet to be found. Existing approaches to automatic parallelization are often highly specialized to exploit the parallelism of specific program patterns, and thus to parallelize a small subset of programs only. In addition, frequently used invasive runtime systems prohibit the combination of different approaches, which impedes the practicality of automatic parallelization. In the following thesis, we show that specializing to narrowly defined program patterns is not necessary to efficiently parallelize applications coming from different domains. We develop a generalizing approach to parallelization, which, driven by an underlying mathematical optimization problem, is able to make qualified parallelization decisions taking into account the involved runtime overhead. In combination with a specializing, adaptive runtime system the approach is able to match and even exceed the performance results achieved by specialized approaches.Mehrkernsysteme sind heutzutage allgegenwärtig und finden täglich weitere Verbreitung. Und während, limitiert durch die Grenzen des physikalisch Machbaren, die Rechenkraft der einzelnen Kerne bereits seit Jahren stagniert oder gar sinkt, existiert bis heute keine zufriedenstellende Lösung zur effektiven Ausnutzung der gebotenen Rechenkraft, die mit der steigenden Anzahl an Kernen einhergeht. Existierende Ansätze der automatischen Parallelisierung sind häufig hoch spezialisiert auf die Ausnutzung bestimmter Programm-Muster, und somit auf die Parallelisierung weniger Programmteile. Hinzu kommt, dass häufig verwendete invasive Laufzeitsysteme die Kombination mehrerer Parallelisierungs-Ansätze verhindern, was der Praxistauglichkeit und Reichweite automatischer Ansätze im Wege steht. In der Ihnen vorliegenden Arbeit zeigen wir, dass die Spezialisierung auf eng definierte Programmuster nicht notwendig ist, um Parallelität in Programmen verschiedener Domänen effizient auszunutzen. Wir entwickeln einen generalisierenden Ansatz der Parallelisierung, der, getrieben von einem mathematischen Optimierungsproblem, in der Lage ist, fundierte Parallelisierungsentscheidungen unter Berücksichtigung relevanter Kosten zu treffen. In Kombination mit einem spezialisierenden und adaptiven Laufzeitsystem ist der entwickelte Ansatz in der Lage, mit den Ergebnissen spezialisierter Ansätze mitzuhalten, oder diese gar zu übertreffen.Part of the work presented in this thesis was performed in the context of the SoftwareCluster project EMERGENT (http://www.software-cluster.org). It was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under grant no. “01IC10S01”. Later work has been supported, also by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), through funding for the Center for IT-Security, Privacy and Accountability (CISPA) under grant no. “16KIS0344”