1,980 research outputs found
Centering in-the-large: Computing referential discourse segments
We specify an algorithm that builds up a hierarchy of referential discourse
segments from local centering data. The spatial extension and nesting of these
discourse segments constrain the reachability of potential antecedents of an
anaphoric expression beyond the local level of adjacent center pairs. Thus, the
centering model is scaled up to the level of the global referential structure
of discourse. An empirical evaluation of the algorithm is supplied.Comment: LaTeX, 8 page
Vagueness and referential ambiguity in a large-scale annotated corpus
In this paper, we argue that difficulties in the definition of coreference itself contribute to lower inter-annotator agreement in certain cases. Data from a large referentially annotated corpus serves to corroborate this point, using a quantitative investigation to assess which effects or problems are likely to be the most prominent. Several examples where such problems occur are discussed in more detail, and we then propose a generalisation of Poesio, Reyle and Stevensonâs Justified Sloppiness Hypothesis to provide a unified model for these cases of disagreement and argue that a deeper understanding of the phenomena involved allows to tackle problematic cases in a more principled fashion than would be possible using only pre-theoretic intuitions
Centering, Anaphora Resolution, and Discourse Structure
Centering was formulated as a model of the relationship between attentional
state, the form of referring expressions, and the coherence of an utterance
within a discourse segment (Grosz, Joshi and Weinstein, 1986; Grosz, Joshi and
Weinstein, 1995). In this chapter, I argue that the restriction of centering to
operating within a discourse segment should be abandoned in order to integrate
centering with a model of global discourse structure. The within-segment
restriction causes three problems. The first problem is that centers are often
continued over discourse segment boundaries with pronominal referring
expressions whose form is identical to those that occur within a discourse
segment. The second problem is that recent work has shown that listeners
perceive segment boundaries at various levels of granularity. If centering
models a universal processing phenomenon, it is implausible that each listener
is using a different centering algorithm.The third issue is that even for
utterances within a discourse segment, there are strong contrasts between
utterances whose adjacent utterance within a segment is hierarchically recent
and those whose adjacent utterance within a segment is linearly recent. This
chapter argues that these problems can be eliminated by replacing Grosz and
Sidner's stack model of attentional state with an alternate model, the cache
model. I show how the cache model is easily integrated with the centering
algorithm, and provide several types of data from naturally occurring
discourses that support the proposed integrated model. Future work should
provide additional support for these claims with an examination of a larger
corpus of naturally occurring discourses.Comment: 35 pages, uses elsart12, lingmacros, named, psfi
An Analysis of Mixed Initiative and Collaboration in Information-Seeking Dialogues
The ability to engage in mixed-initiative interaction is one of the core
requirements for a conversational search system. How to achieve this is poorly
understood. We propose a set of unsupervised metrics, termed ConversationShape,
that highlights the role each of the conversation participants plays by
comparing the distribution of vocabulary and utterance types. Using
ConversationShape as a lens, we take a closer look at several conversational
search datasets and compare them with other dialogue datasets to better
understand the types of dialogue interaction they represent, either driven by
the information seeker or the assistant. We discover that deviations from the
ConversationShape of a human-human dialogue of the same type is predictive of
the quality of a human-machine dialogue.Comment: SIGIR 2020 short conference pape
Comparing knowledge sources for nominal anaphora resolution
We compare two ways of obtaining lexical knowledge for antecedent selection in other-anaphora
and definite noun phrase coreference. Specifically, we compare an algorithm that relies on links
encoded in the manually created lexical hierarchy WordNet and an algorithm that mines corpora
by means of shallow lexico-semantic patterns. As corpora we use the British National
Corpus (BNC), as well as the Web, which has not been previously used for this task. Our
results show that (a) the knowledge encoded in WordNet is often insufficient, especially for
anaphor-antecedent relations that exploit subjective or context-dependent knowledge; (b) for
other-anaphora, the Web-based method outperforms the WordNet-based method; (c) for definite
NP coreference, the Web-based method yields results comparable to those obtained using
WordNet over the whole dataset and outperforms the WordNet-based method on subsets of the
dataset; (d) in both case studies, the BNC-based method is worse than the other methods because
of data sparseness. Thus, in our studies, the Web-based method alleviated the lexical knowledge
gap often encountered in anaphora resolution, and handled examples with context-dependent relations
between anaphor and antecedent. Because it is inexpensive and needs no hand-modelling
of lexical knowledge, it is a promising knowledge source to integrate in anaphora resolution systems
An authoring tool for decision support systems in context questions of ecological knowledge
Decision support systems (DSS) support business or organizational decision-making activities, which require the access to information that is internally stored in databases or data warehouses, and externally in the Web accessed by Information Retrieval (IR) or Question Answering (QA) systems. Graphical interfaces to query these sources of information ease to constrain dynamically query formulation based on user selections, but they present a lack of flexibility in query formulation, since the expressivity power is reduced to the user interface design. Natural language interfaces (NLI) are expected as the optimal solution. However, especially for non-expert users, a real natural communication is the most difficult to realize effectively. In this paper, we propose an NLI that improves the interaction between the user and the DSS by means of referencing previous questions or their answers (i.e. anaphora such as the pronoun reference in âWhat traits are affected by them?â), or by eliding parts of the question (i.e. ellipsis such as âAnd to glume colour?â after the question âTell me the QTLs related to awn colour in wheatâ). Moreover, in order to overcome one of the main problems of NLIs about the difficulty to adapt an NLI to a new domain, our proposal is based on ontologies that are obtained semi-automatically from a framework that allows the integration of internal and external, structured and unstructured information. Therefore, our proposal can interface with databases, data warehouses, QA and IR systems. Because of the high NL ambiguity of the resolution process, our proposal is presented as an authoring tool that helps the user to query efficiently in natural language. Finally, our proposal is tested on a DSS case scenario about Biotechnology and Agriculture, whose knowledge base is the CEREALAB database as internal structured data, and the Web (e.g. PubMed) as external unstructured information.This paper has been partially supported by the MESOLAP (TIN2010-14860), GEODAS-BI (TIN2012-37493-C03-03), LEGOLANGUAGE (TIN2012-31224) and DIIM2.0 (PROMETEOII/2014/001) projects from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Competitivity. Alejandro MatĂŠ is funded by the Generalitat Valenciana under an ACIF grant (ACIF/2010/298)
Do You See What I Mean? Visual Resolution of Linguistic Ambiguities
Understanding language goes hand in hand with the ability to integrate
complex contextual information obtained via perception. In this work, we
present a novel task for grounded language understanding: disambiguating a
sentence given a visual scene which depicts one of the possible interpretations
of that sentence. To this end, we introduce a new multimodal corpus containing
ambiguous sentences, representing a wide range of syntactic, semantic and
discourse ambiguities, coupled with videos that visualize the different
interpretations for each sentence. We address this task by extending a vision
model which determines if a sentence is depicted by a video. We demonstrate how
such a model can be adjusted to recognize different interpretations of the same
underlying sentence, allowing to disambiguate sentences in a unified fashion
across the different ambiguity types.Comment: EMNLP 201
- âŚ