ASP(AC): Answer Set Programming with Algebraic Constraints

Weighted Logic is a powerful tool for the specification of calculations over semirings that depend on qualitative information. Using a novel combination of Weighted Logic and Here-and-There (HT) Logic, in which this dependence is based on intuitionistic grounds, we introduce Answer Set Programming with Algebraic Constraints (ASP(AC)), where rules may contain constraints that compare semiring values to weighted formula evaluations. Such constraints provide streamlined access to a manifold of constructs available in ASP, like aggregates, choice constraints, and arithmetic operators. They extend some of them and provide a generic framework for defining programs with algebraic computation, which can be fruitfully used e.g. for provenance semantics of datalog programs. While undecidable in general, expressive fragments of ASP(AC) can be exploited for effective problem-solving in a rich framework. This work is under consideration for acceptance in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.Comment: 32 pages, 16 pages are appendi

Sampler Programs: The Stable Model Semantics of Abstract Constraint Programs Revisited

Abstract constraint atoms provide a general framework for the study of aggregates utilized in answer set programming. Such primitives suitably increase the expressive power of rules and enable more concise representation of various domains as answer set programs. However, it is non-trivial to generalize the stable model semantics for programs involving arbitrary abstract constraint atoms. For instance, a nondeterministic variant of the immediate consequence operator is needed, or the definition of stable models cannot be stated directly using primitives of logic programs. In this paper, we propose sampler programs as a relaxation of abstract constraint programs that better lend themselves to the program transformation involved in the definition of stable models. Consequently, the declarative nature of stable models can be restored for sampler programs and abstract constraint programs are also covered if decomposed into sampler programs. Moreover, we study the relationships of the classes of programs involved and provide a characterization in terms of abstract but essentially deterministic computations. This result indicates that all nondeterminism related with abstract constraint atoms can be resolved at the level of program reduct when sampler programs are used as the intermediate representation

Computing a Probabilistic Extension of Answer Set Program Language Using ASP and Markov Logic Solvers

abstract: LPMLN is a recent probabilistic logic programming language which combines both Answer Set Programming (ASP) and Markov Logic. It is a proper extension of Answer Set programs which allows for reasoning about uncertainty using weighted rules under the stable model semantics with a weight scheme that is adopted from Markov Logic. LPMLN has been shown to be related to several formalisms from the knowledge representation (KR) side such as ASP and P-Log, and the statistical relational learning (SRL) side such as Markov Logic Networks (MLN), Problog and Pearl’s causal models (PCM). Formalisms like ASP, P-Log, Problog, MLN, PCM have all been shown to embeddable in LPMLN which demonstrates the expressivity of the language. Interestingly, LPMLN has also been shown to reducible to ASP and MLN which is not only theoretically interesting, but also practically important from a computational point of view in that the reductions yield ways to compute LPMLN programs utilizing ASP and MLN solvers. Additionally, the reductions also allow the users to compute other formalisms which can be reduced to LPMLN. This thesis realizes two implementations of LPMLN based on the reductions from LPMLN to ASP and LPMLN to MLN. This thesis first presents an implementation of LPMLN called LPMLN2ASP that uses standard ASP solvers for computing MAP inference using weak constraints, and marginal and conditional probabilities using stable models enumeration. Next, in this thesis, another implementation of LPMLN called LPMLN2MLN is presented that uses MLN solvers which apply completion to compute the tight fragment of LPMLN programs for MAP inference, marginal and conditional probabilities. The computation using ASP solvers yields exact inference as opposed to approximate inference using MLN solvers. Using these implementations, the usefulness of LPMLN for computing other formalisms is demonstrated by reducing them to LPMLN. The thesis also shows how the implementations are better than the native solvers of some of these formalisms on certain domains. The implementations make use of the current state of the art solving technologies in ASP and MLN, and therefore they benefit from any theoretical and practical advances in these technologies, thereby also benefiting the computation of other formalisms that can be reduced to LPMLN. Furthermore, the implementation also allows for certain SRL formalisms to be computed by ASP solvers, and certain KR formalisms to be computed by MLN solvers.Dissertation/ThesisMasters Thesis Computer Science 201

Exploiting Unfounded Sets for HEX-Program Evaluation

HEX programs extend logic programs with external computations through external atoms, whose answer sets are the minimal models of the Faber-Leone-Pfeifer-reduct. As already reasoning from Horn programs with nonmonotonic external atoms of polynomial complexity is on the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, answer set checking needs special attention; simply computing reducts and searching for smaller models does not scale well. We thus extend an approach based on unfounded sets to HEX and integrate it in a Conflict Driven Clause Learning framework for HEX program evaluation. It reduces the check to a search for unfounded sets, which is more efficiently implemented as a SAT problem. We give a basic encoding for HEX and show optimizations by additional clauses. Experiments show that the new approach significantly decreases runtime

A Paraconsistent ASP-like Language with Tractable Model Generation

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is nowadays a dominant rule-based knowledge representation tool. Though existing ASP variants enjoy efficient implementations, generating an answer set remains intractable. The goal of this research is to define a new \asp-like rule language, 4SP, with tractable model generation. The language combines ideas of ASP and a paraconsistent rule language 4QL. Though 4SP shares the syntax of \asp and for each program all its answer sets are among 4SP models, the new language differs from ASP in its logical foundations, the intended methodology of its use and complexity of computing models. As we show in the paper, 4QL can be seen as a paraconsistent counterpart of ASP programs stratified with respect to default negation. Although model generation of well-supported models for 4QL programs is tractable, dropping stratification makes both 4QL and ASP intractable. To retain tractability while allowing non-stratified programs, in 4SP we introduce trial expressions interlacing programs with hypotheses as to the truth values of default negations. This allows us to develop a~model generation algorithm with deterministic polynomial time complexity. We also show relationships among 4SP, ASP and 4QL