Scheduling unrelated parallel machines with resource-assignable sequence-dependent setup times

[EN] A novel scheduling problem that results from the addition of resource-assignable setups is presented in this paper. We consider an unrelated parallel machine problem with machine and job sequence-dependent setup times. The new characteristic is that the amount of setup time does not only depend on the machine and job sequence but also on the amount of resources assigned, which can vary between a minimum and a maximum. The aim is to give solution to real problems arising in several industries where frequent setup operations in production lines have to be carried out. These operations are indeed setups whose length can be reduced or extended according to the amount of resources assigned to them. The objective function considered is a linear combination of total completion time and the total amount of resources assigned. We present a mixed integer program (MIP) model and some fast dispatching heuristics. We carry out careful and comprehensive statistical analyses to study what characteristics of the problem affect the MIP model performance. We also study the effectiveness of the different heuristics proposed. © 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited.The authors are indebted to the referees and editor for a close examination of the paper, which has increased its quality and presentation. This work is partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, under the project "SMPA-Advanced Parallel Multiobjective Sequencing: Practical and Theoretical Advances" with reference DPI2008-03511/DPI. The authors should also thank the IMPIVA-Institute for the Small and Medium Valencian Enterprise, for the project OSC with references IMIDIC/2008/137, IMIDIC/2009/198, and IMIDIC/2010/175.Ruiz García, R.; Andrés Romano, C. (2011). Scheduling unrelated parallel machines with resource-assignable sequence-dependent setup times. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 57(5):777-794. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-011-3318-2S777794575Allahverdi A, Gupta JND, Aldowaisan T (1999) A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 27(2):219–239Allahverdi A, Ng CT, Cheng TCE, Kovalyov MY (2008) A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs. Eur J Oper Res 187(3):985–1032Balakrishnan N, Kanet JJ, Sridharan SV (1999) Early/tardy scheduling with sequence dependent setups on uniform parallel machines. Comput Oper Res 26(2):127–141Biggs D, De Ville B, and Suen E (1991) A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Stat 18(1):49–62Chen J-F (2006) Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with secondary resource constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(3):285–292Cheng TCE, Sin CCS (1990) A state-of-the-art review of parallel machine scheduling research. Eur J Oper Res 47(3):271–292Graham RL, Lawler EL, Lenstra JK, Rinnooy Kan AHG (1979) Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Ann Discrete Math 5:287–326Grigoriev E, Sviridenko M, Uetz M (2007) Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with resource dependent processing times. Math Program Ser A and B 110(1):209–228Guinet A (1991) Textile production systems: a succession of non-identical parallel processor shops. J Oper Res Soc 42(8):655–671Guinet A, Dussauchoy A (1993) Scheduling sequence dependent jobs on identical parallel machines to minimize completion time criteria. Int J Prod Res 31(7):1579–1594Horn WA (1973) Minimizing average flow time with parallel machines. Oper Res 21(3):846–847Kass GV (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat 29(2):119–127Kim DW, Kim KH, Jang W, Chen FF (2002) Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with setup times using simulated annealing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 18(3–4):223–231Lam K, Xing W (1997) New trends in parallel machine scheduling. Int J Oper Prod Manage 17(3):326–338Lee YH, Pinedo M (1997) Scheduling jobs on parallel machines with sequence dependent setup times. Eur J Oper Res 100(3):464–474Marsh JD, Montgomery DC (1973) Optimal procedures for scheduling jobs with sequence-dependent changeover times on parallel processors. AIIE Technical Papers, pp 279–286Mokotoff E (2001) Parallel machine scheduling problems: a survey. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 18(2):193–242Morgan JA, Sonquist JN (1963) Problems in the analysis of survey data and a proposal. J Am Stat Assoc 58:415–434Ng CT, Edwin Cheng TC, Janiak A, Kovalyov MY (2005) Group scheduling with controllable setup and processing times: minimizing total weighted completion time. Ann Oper Res 133:163–174Nowicki E, Zdrzalka S (1990) A survey of results for sequencing problems with controllable processing times. Discrete Appl Math 26(2–3):271–287Pinedo M (2002) Scheduling: theory, algorithms, and systems, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleRabadi G, Moraga RJ, Al-Salem A (2006) Heuristics for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with setup times. J Intell Manuf 17(1):85–97Radhakrishnan S, Ventura JA (2000) Simulated annealing for parallel machine scheduling with earliness-tardiness penalties and sequence-dependent set-up times. Int J Prod Res 38(10):2233–2252Ruiz R, Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu F, Urlings T (2008) Modeling realistic hybrid flexible flowshop scheduling problems. Comput Oper Res 35(4):1151–1175Sivrikaya-Serifoglu F, Ulusoy G (1999) Parallel machine scheduling with earliness and tardiness penalties. Comput Oper Res 26(8):773–787Webster ST (1997) The complexity of scheduling job families about a common due date. Oper Res Lett 20(2):65–74Weng MX, Lu J, Ren H (2001) Unrelated parallel machines scheduling with setup consideration and a total weighted completion time objective. Int J Prod Econ 70(3):215–226Yang W-H, Liao C-J (1999) Survey of scheduling research involving setup times. Int J Syst Sci 30(2):143–155Zhang F, Tang GC, Chen ZL (2001) A 3/2-approximation algorithm for parallel machine scheduling with controllable processing times. Oper Res Lett 29(1):41–47Zhu Z, Heady R (2000) Minimizing the sum of earliness/tardiness in multi-machine scheduling: a mixed integer programming approach. Comput Ind Eng 38(2):297–30

A Dynamic Heuristic for the Stochastic Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem

This paper addresses the problem of batch scheduling in an unrelated parallel machine environment with sequence dependent setup times and an objective of minimizing the total weighted mean completion time. The jobs\u27 processing times and setup times are stochastic for better depiction of the real world. This is a NP-hard problem and in this paper, new heuristics are developed and compared to existing ones using simulation. The results and analysis obtained from the computational experiments proved the superiority of the proposed algorithm PMWP over the other algorithms presented

Scheduling Jobs in Flowshops with the Introduction of Additional Machines in the Future

This is the author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Elsevier and can be found at: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/expert-systems-with-applications/.The problem of scheduling jobs to minimize total weighted tardiness in flowshops,\ud with the possibility of evolving into hybrid flowshops in the future, is investigated in\ud this paper. As this research is guided by a real problem in industry, the flowshop\ud considered has considerable flexibility, which stimulated the development of an\ud innovative methodology for this research. Each stage of the flowshop currently has\ud one or several identical machines. However, the manufacturing company is planning\ud to introduce additional machines with different capabilities in different stages in the\ud near future. Thus, the algorithm proposed and developed for the problem is not only\ud capable of solving the current flow line configuration but also the potential new\ud configurations that may result in the future. A meta-heuristic search algorithm based\ud on Tabu search is developed to solve this NP-hard, industry-guided problem. Six\ud different initial solution finding mechanisms are proposed. A carefully planned\ud nested split-plot design is performed to test the significance of different factors and\ud their impact on the performance of the different algorithms. To the best of our\ud knowledge, this research is the first of its kind that attempts to solve an industry-guided\ud problem with the concern for future developments

Analysis of a Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem with Sequence Dependent Setup Times and Job Availability Intervals

In this study, we propose constraint programming (CP) model and logic-based Benders algorithms in order to make the best decisions for scheduling non-identical jobs with availability intervals and sequence dependent setup times on unrelated parallel machines in a fixed planning horizon. In this problem, each job has a profit, cost and must be assigned to at most one machine in such a way that total profit is maximized. In addition, the total cost has to be less than or equal to a budget level. Computational tests are performed on a real-life case study prepared in collaboration with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Our initial investigations show that the pure CP model is very efficient in obtaining good quality feasible solutions but, fails to report the optimal solution for the majority of the problem instances. On the other hand, the two logic-based Benders decomposition algorithms are able to obtain near optimal solutions for 86 instances out of 90 examinees. For the remaining instances, they provide a feasible solution. Further investigations show the high quality of the solutions obtained by the pure CP model

List scheduling revisited

We consider the problem of scheduling n jobs on m identical parallel machines to minimize a regular cost function. The standard list scheduling algorithm converts a list into a feasible schedule by focusing on the job start times. We prove that list schedules are dominant for this type of problem. Furthermore, we prove that an alternative list scheduling algorithm, focusing on the completion times rather than the start times, yields also dominant list schedules for problems with sequence dependent setup times