Exact Algorithms for Maximum Clique: a computational study

We investigate a number of recently reported exact algorithms for the maximum clique problem (MCQ, MCR, MCS, BBMC). The program code used is presented and critiqued showing how small changes in implementation can have a drastic effect on performance. The computational study demonstrates how problem features and hardware platforms influence algorithm behaviour. The minimum width order (smallest-last) is investigated, and MCS is broken into its consituent parts and we discover that one of these parts degrades performance. It is shown that the standard procedure used for rescaling published results is unsafe.Comment: 40 pages, 14 figures, 10 tables, 12 short java program listings, code afailable to download at http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~pat/maxClique/distribution

New Classes of Distributed Time Complexity

A number of recent papers -- e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) -- have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph problem $\Pi$ in which a solution can be verified by checking all radius-$O(1)$ neighbourhoods, and the question is what is the smallest $T$ such that a solution can be computed so that each node chooses its own output based on its radius-$T$ neighbourhood. Here $T$ is the distributed time complexity of $\Pi$. The time complexity classes for deterministic algorithms in bounded-degree graphs that are known to exist by prior work are $\Theta(1)$, $\Theta(\log^* n)$, $\Theta(\log n)$, $\Theta(n^{1/k})$, and $\Theta(n)$. It is also known that there are two gaps: one between $\omega(1)$ and $o(\log \log^* n)$, and another between $\omega(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. It has been conjectured that many more gaps exist, and that the overall time hierarchy is relatively simple -- indeed, this is known to be the case in restricted graph families such as cycles and grids. We show that the picture is much more diverse than previously expected. We present a general technique for engineering LCL problems with numerous different deterministic time complexities, including $\Theta(\log^{\alpha}n)$ for any $\alpha\ge1$, $2^{\Theta(\log^{\alpha}n)}$ for any $\alpha\le 1$, and $\Theta(n^{\alpha})$ for any $\alpha <1/2$ in the high end of the complexity spectrum, and $\Theta(\log^{\alpha}\log^* n)$ for any $\alpha\ge 1$, $\smash{2^{\Theta(\log^{\alpha}\log^* n)}}$ for any $\alpha\le 1$, and $\Theta((\log^* n)^{\alpha})$ for any $\alpha \le 1$ in the low end; here $\alpha$ is a positive rational number

3-Colourability of Dually Chordal Graphs in Linear Time

A graph G is dually chordal if there is a spanning tree T of G such that any maximal clique of G induces a subtree in T. This paper investigates the Colourability problem on dually chordal graphs. It will show that it is NP-complete in case of four colours and solvable in linear time with a simple algorithm in case of three colours. In addition, it will be shown that a dually chordal graph is 3-colourable if and only if it is perfect and has no clique of size four