24,141 research outputs found
A Complete Theory of Everything (will be subjective)
Increasingly encompassing models have been suggested for our world. Theories
range from generally accepted to increasingly speculative to apparently bogus.
The progression of theories from ego- to geo- to helio-centric models to
universe and multiverse theories and beyond was accompanied by a dramatic
increase in the sizes of the postulated worlds, with humans being expelled from
their center to ever more remote and random locations. Rather than leading to a
true theory of everything, this trend faces a turning point after which the
predictive power of such theories decreases (actually to zero). Incorporating
the location and other capacities of the observer into such theories avoids
this problem and allows to distinguish meaningful from predictively meaningless
theories. This also leads to a truly complete theory of everything consisting
of a (conventional objective) theory of everything plus a (novel subjective)
observer process. The observer localization is neither based on the
controversial anthropic principle, nor has it anything to do with the
quantum-mechanical observation process. The suggested principle is extended to
more practical (partial, approximate, probabilistic, parametric) world models
(rather than theories of everything). Finally, I provide a justification of
Ockham's razor, and criticize the anthropic principle, the doomsday argument,
the no free lunch theorem, and the falsifiability dogma.Comment: 26 LaTeX page
Mathematics Is Physics
In this essay, I argue that mathematics is a natural science---just like
physics, chemistry, or biology---and that this can explain the alleged
"unreasonable" effectiveness of mathematics in the physical sciences. The main
challenge for this view is to explain how mathematical theories can become
increasingly abstract and develop their own internal structure, whilst still
maintaining an appropriate empirical tether that can explain their later use in
physics. In order to address this, I offer a theory of mathematical
theory-building based on the idea that human knowledge has the structure of a
scale-free network and that abstract mathematical theories arise from a
repeated process of replacing strong analogies with new hubs in this network.
This allows mathematics to be seen as the study of regularities, within
regularities, within ..., within regularities of the natural world. Since
mathematical theories are derived from the natural world, albeit at a much
higher level of abstraction than most other scientific theories, it should come
as no surprise that they so often show up in physics.
This version of the essay contains an addendum responding to Slyvia
Wenmackers' essay and comments that were made on the FQXi website.Comment: 15 pages, LaTeX. Second prize winner in 2015 FQXi Essay Contest (see
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2364
- …