On the intersection of fixed subgroups of Fn×FmF_n\times F_m

We prove that, although it is undecidable if a subgroup fixed by an automorphism intersects nontrivially an arbitrary subgroup of $F_n\times F_m$, there is an algorithm that, taking as input a monomorphism and an endomorphism of $F_n\times F_m$, decides whether their fixed subgroups intersect nontrivially. The general case of this problem, where two arbitrary endomorphisms are given as input remains unknown. We show that, when two endomorphisms of a certain type are given as input, this problem is equivalent to the Post Correspondence Problem for free groups.Comment: 11 pages, comments are welcom

The Equalizer Conjecture for the free group of rank two

Funding: This research was supported by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant EP/R035814/1.The equalizer of a set of homomorphisms S : F(a,b) → F(Δ) has rank at most two if S contains an injective map and is not finitely generated otherwise. This proves a strong form of Stallings’ Equalizer Conjecture for the free group of rank two. Results are also obtained for pairs of homomorphisms g,h : F(Σ) → F(Δ) when the images are inert in, or retracts of, F(Δ).Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Rational subsets of Baumslag-Solitar groups

We consider the rational subset membership problem for Baumslag-Solitar groups. These groups form a prominent class in the area of algorithmic group theory, and they were recently identified as an obstacle for understanding the rational subsets of $\text{GL}(2,\mathbb{Q})$. We show that rational subset membership for Baumslag-Solitar groups $\text{BS}(1,q)$ with $q\ge 2$ is decidable and PSPACE-complete. To this end, we introduce a word representation of the elements of $\text{BS}(1,q)$: their pointed expansion (PE), an annotated $q$-ary expansion. Seeing subsets of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ as word languages, this leads to a natural notion of PE-regular subsets of $\text{BS}(1, q)$: these are the subsets of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ whose sets of PE are regular languages. Our proof shows that every rational subset of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ is PE-regular. Since the class of PE-regular subsets of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ is well-equipped with closure properties, we obtain further applications of these results. Our results imply that (i) emptiness of Boolean combinations of rational subsets is decidable, (ii) membership to each fixed rational subset of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ is decidable in logarithmic space, and (iii) it is decidable whether a given rational subset is recognizable. In particular, it is decidable whether a given finitely generated subgroup of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ has finite index.Comment: Long version of paper with same title appearing in ICALP'2

Post's correspondence problem for hyperbolic and virtually nilpotent groups

Post's Correspondence Problem (the PCP) is a classical decision problem in theoretical computer science that asks whether for pairs of free monoid morphisms $g, h\colon\Sigma^*\to\Delta^*$ there exists any non-trivial $x\in\Sigma^*$ such that $g(x)=h(x)$. Post's Correspondence Problem for a group $\Gamma$ takes pairs of group homomorphisms $g, h\colon F(\Sigma)\to \Gamma$ instead, and similarly asks whether there exists an $x$ such that $g(x)=h(x)$ holds for non-elementary reasons. The restrictions imposed on $x$ in order to get non-elementary solutions lead to several interpretations of the problem; we consider the natural restriction asking that $x \notin \ker(g) \cap \ker(h)$ and prove that the resulting interpretation of the PCP is undecidable for arbitrary hyperbolic $\Gamma$, but decidable when $\Gamma$ is virtually nilpotent. We also study this problem for group constructions such as subgroups, direct products and finite extensions. This problem is equivalent to an interpretation due to Myasnikov, Nikolev and Ushakov when one map is injective.Comment: 17 page

Proceedings of the Second Program Visualization Workshop, 2002

The Program Visualization Workshops aim to bring together researchers who design and construct program visualizations and, above all, educators who use and evaluate visualizations in their teaching. The first workshop took place in July 2000 at Porvoo, Finland. The second workshop was held in cooperation with ACM SIGCSE and took place at HornstrupCentret, Denmark in June 2002, immediately following the ITiCSE 2002 Conference in Aarhus, Denmark

Algorithmic Problems in Group Theory (Dagstuhl Seminar 19131)

Since its early days, combinatorial group theory was deeply interwoven with computability theory. In the last 20 years we have seen many new successful interactions between group theory and computer science. On one hand, groups played an important rule in many developments in complexity theory and automata theory. On the other hand, concepts from these computer science fields as well as efficient algorithms, cryptography, and data compression led to the formulation of new questions in group theory. The Dagstuhl Seminar Algorithmic Problems in Group Theory was aimed at bringing together researchers from group theory and computer science so that they can share their expertise. This report documents the material presented during the course of the seminar