An Intuitionistic Multiplicative ORESTE Method for Patients’ Prioritization of Hospitalization

The tension brought about by sickbeds is a common and intractable issue in public hospitals in China due to the large population. Assigning the order of hospitalization of patients is difficult because of complex patient information such as disease type, emergency degree, and severity. It is critical to rank the patients taking full account of various factors. However, most of the evaluation criteria for hospitalization are qualitative, and the classical ranking method cannot derive the detailed relations between patients based on these criteria. Motivated by this, a comprehensive multiple criteria decision making method named the intuitionistic multiplicative ORESTE (organísation, rangement et Synthèse dedonnées relarionnelles, in French) was proposed to handle the problem. The subjective and objective weights of criteria were considered in the proposed method. To do so, first, considering the vagueness of human perceptions towards the alternatives, an intuitionistic multiplicative preference relation model is applied to represent the experts’ preferences over the pairwise alternatives with respect to the predetermined criteria. Then, a correlation coefficient-based weight determining method is developed to derive the objective weights of criteria. This method can overcome the biased results caused by highly-related criteria. Afterwards, we improved the general ranking method, ORESTE, by introducing a new score function which considers both the subjective and objective weights of criteria. An intuitionistic multiplicative ORESTE method was then developed and further highlighted by a case study concerning the patients’ prioritization.The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71501135, 71771156, 71532007), the Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars at Sichuan University (No. 2016SCU04A23), and the Grant from the FEDER funds (No. TIN2016-75850-R)

Aggregation operators in group decision making: Identifying citation classics via H-classics

To analyze the past, present and future of a particular research field, classic papers are usually studied because they identify the highly cited papers being a relevant reference point in that specific research area. As a result of the possible mapping between high quality research and high citation counts, highly cited papers are very interesting. The objective of this study is to use the H-classics method, which is based on the popular h-index, to identify and analyze the highly cited documents published about aggregation operators in the research area of group decision making. According to the H-classics method, this research area is represented by 87 citation classics, which have been published from 1988 to 2014. Authors, affiliations (universities/institutions and countries), journals, books and conferences, and the topics covered by these 87 highly cited papers are studied.The authors would like to thank FEDER financial support from the Projects TIN2013-40658-P and TIN2016- 75850-P

Uninorm trust propagation and aggregation methods for group decision making in social network with four tuples information

The file attached to this record is the authors accepted version. The publisher's final version of record can be found by following the DOI link below.A novel social network based group decision making (SN-GDM) model with experts' weights not provided beforehand and with the following four tuple information: trust; distrust; hesitancy; and inconsistency, is introduced. The concepts of trust score (TS) and knowledge degree (KD) are de ned and combined into a trust order space. Then, a strict trust ranking order relation of trust function values (TFs) is built in which TS and KD play a similar role to the mean and the variance in Statistics. After the operational laws of TFs for uninorm operators are built, the uninorm propagation operator is investigated. It can propagate through a network both trust and distrust information simultaneously and therefore it prevents the loss of trust information in the propagating process. When an indirect trust relationship is built, the uninorm trust weighted average (UTWA) operator and the uninorm trust ordered weighted average (UTOWA) operator are de ned and used to aggregate individual trust relationship and to obtain their associated ranking order relation. Hence, the most trusted expert is distinguished from the group, and the weights of experts are determined in a reasonable way: the higher an expert is trusted the more importance value is assigned to the expert. Therefore, the novelty of the proposed SN-GDM is that it can use indirect trust relationship via trusted third partners (TTPs) as a reliable resource to determine experts' weights. Finally, the individual trust decision making matrices are aggregated into a collective one and the alternative with the highest trust order relation is selected as the best one

A hierarchical integration method under social constraints to maximize satisfaction in multiple criteria group decision making systems

Aggregating multiple opinions or assessments in a decision has always been a challenging field topic for researchers. Over the last decade, different approaches, mainly based on weighting data sources or decision-makers (DMs), have been proposed to resolve this issue, although social choice theory, focused on frameworks to combine individual opinions, is generally overlooked. To resolve this situation, a novel methodology is developed in this paper based on social choice theory and statistical mathematics. This method innovates by dividing the assessment into components which provides a multiple assessment analysis, assigning weights to each source regarding their position compared to the group for each considered criteria. This multiple-weighting process maximises individual and group satisfaction. Furthermore, the method makes it possible to manage previously assigned influence. An example is given to illustrate the proposed methodology. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is performed and comparisons with other methods are made. Finally, conclusions are presented.The first author acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports [grant number FPU18/01471]. The second and third author wish to recognise their support from the Serra Hunter programme. Finally, this work was supported by the Catalan agency AGAUR through its research group support program (2017SGR00227). This research is part of the R&D project IAQ4EDU, reference no. PID2020-117366RB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version