A Repository of Method Fragments for Agent-Oriented Development of Learning-Based Edge Computing Systems

[EN] The upcoming avenue of IoT, with its massive generated data, makes it really hard to train centralized systems with machine learning in real time. This problem can be addressed with learning-based edge computing systems where the learning is performed in a distributed way on the nodes. In particular, this work focuses on developing multi-agent systems for implementing learning-based edge computing systems. The diversity of methodologies in agent-oriented software engineering reflects the complexity of developing multi-agent systems. The division of the development processes into method fragments facilitates the application of agent-oriented methodologies and their study. In this line of research, this work proposes a database for implementing a repository of method fragments considering the development of learning-based edge computing systems and the information recommended by the FIPA technical committee. This repository makes method fragments available from different methodologies, and computerizes certain metrics and queries over the existing method fragments. This work compares the performance of several combinations of dimensionality reduction methods and machine learning techniques (i.e., support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors, and multi-layer perceptron neural networks) in a simulator of a learning-based edge computing system for estimating profits and customers.The authors acknowledge PSU Smart Systems Engineering Lab, project "Utilisation of IoT and sensors in smart cities for improving quality of life of impaired people" (ref. 52-2020), CYTED (ref. 518RT0558), and the Spanish Council of Science, Innovation and Universities (TIN2017-88327-R).García-Magariño, I.; Nasralla, MM.; Lloret, J. (2021). A Repository of Method Fragments for Agent-Oriented Development of Learning-Based Edge Computing Systems. IEEE Network. 35(1):156-162. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.011.2000296S15616235

A survey on quality of service support on middelware-based distributed messaging systems used in multi agent systems

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19934-9_10Messaging systems are widely used in distributed systems to hide the details of the communications mechanism to the multi agents systems. However, the Quality of Service is treated in different way depending on the messaging system used. This article presents a review and further analysis of the quality of service treatment in the mainly messaging systems used in distributed multi agent systems. The review covers the issues related to the purpose of the functions provided and the scope of the quality of service offered by every messaging system. We propose ontology for classifying and decide which parameters are relevant to the user. The results of the analysis and the ontology can be used to select the most suitable messaging system to distributed multi agent architecture and to establish the quality of service requirements in a distributed system.The study described in this article is a part of the coordinated project SIDIRELI: Distributed Systems with Limited Resources. Control Kernel and Coordination. Education and Science Department, Spanish Government and European FEDER found. CICYT: MICINN: DPI2008-06737-C02-01/02.Poza-Lujan, J.; Posadas-Yagüe, J.; Simó Ten, JE. (2011). A survey on quality of service support on middelware-based distributed messaging systems used in multi agent systems. En International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence. Springer. 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19934-9_10S7784Gaddah, A., Kunz, T.: A survey of middleware paradigms for mobile computing. Technical Report SCE-03-16. Carleton University Systems and Computing Engineering (2003)Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, http://www.fipa.org/Java Message Service Specification, http://java.sun.com/products/jms/docs.htmlCommon Object Request Broker Architecture, http://www.corba.org/Data Distribution Service, http://portals.omg.org/dds/Java Agent DEvelopment Framework, http://jade.tilab.com/Agent Oriented Software Pty Ltd., JACK Intelligent Agents: User Guide (1999)Nwana, H., Ndumu, D., Lee, L., Collis, J.: ZEUS: A tool-kit for building distributed multi-agent systems. Applied Artifical Intelligence Journal 13(1), 129–186 (1999)Perdikeas, M.K., Chatzipapadopoulos, F.G., Venieris, I.S., Marino, G.: Mobile Agent Standards and Available Platforms. Computer Networks Journal, Special Issue on ’Mobile Agents in Intelligent Networks and Mobile Communication Systems’ 31(10) (1999)Perrone, P.J., Chaganti, K.: J2EE Developer’s Handbook. Sam’s Publishing, Indianapolis (2003)Apache ActiveMQ, http://activemq.apache.org/IBM WebSphere MQSeries, http://mqseries.net/Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/RTI Data Distribution Service. RTI corp., http://www.rti.com/OpenSplice DDS. PrismTech Ltd., http://www.prismtech.comVogel, A., Kerherve, B., von Bochmann, G., Gecsei, J.: Distributed Multimedia and QoS: A Survey. IEEE Multimedia 2(2), 10–19 (1995)Crawley, E., Nair, R., Rajagopalan, B.: RFC 2386: A Framework for QoS-based Routing in the Internet. IETF Internet Draft, 1–37 (1998)Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. FIPA Quality of Service Ontology Specification. Doc: SC00094A (2002)Sun Microsystems, Inc. Java(TM) Message Service Specification Final Release 1.1 (2002)Object Management Group (OMG). The Common Object Request Broker Architecture and Specification. CORBA 2.4.2 (2001

Efficient Communication and Coordination for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems

The growth of the computational power of computers and the speed of networks has made large-scale multi-agent systems a promising technology. As the number of agents in a single application approaches thousands or millions, distributed computing has become a general paradigm in large-scale multi-agent systems to take the benefits of parallel computing. However, since these numerous agents are located on distributed computers and interact intensively with each other to achieve common goals, the agent communication cost significantly affects the performance of applications. Therefore, optimizing the agent communication cost on distributed systems could considerably reduce the runtime of multi-agent applications. Furthermore, because static multi-agent frameworks may not be suitable for all kinds of applications, and the communication patterns of agents may change during execution, multi-agent frameworks should adapt their services to support applications differently according to their dynamic characteristics. This thesis proposes three adaptive services at the agent framework level to reduce the agent communication and coordination cost of large-scale multi-agent applications. First, communication locality-aware agent distribution aims at minimizing inter-node communication by collocating heavily communicating agents on the same platform and maintaining agent group-based load sharing. Second, application agent-oriented middle agent services attempt to optimize agent interaction through middle agents by executing application agent-supported search algorithms on the middle agent address space. Third, message passing for mobile agents aims at reducing the time of message delivery to mobile agents using location caches or by extending the agent address scheme with location information. With these services, we have achieved very impressive experimental results in large- scale UAV simulations including up to 10,000 agents. Also, we have provided a formal definition of our framework and services with operational semantics

Towards self-organized service-oriented multi-agent systems

The demand for large-scale systems running in complex and even chaotic environments requires the consideration of new paradigms and technologies that provide flexibility, robustness, agility and responsiveness. Multiagents systems is pointed out as a suitable approach to address this challenge by offering an alternative way to design control systems, based on the decentralization of control functions over distributed autonomous and cooperative entities. However, in spite of their enormous potential, they usually lack some aspects related to interoperability, optimization in decentralized structures and truly self-adaptation. This paper discusses a new perspective to engineer adaptive complex systems considering a 3-layer framework integrating several complementary paradigms and technologies. In a first step, it suggests the integration of multi-agent systems with service-oriented architectures to overcome the limitations of interoperability and smooth migration, followed by the use of technology enablers, such as cloud computing and wireless sensor networks, to provide a ubiquitous and reconfigurable environment. Finally, the resulted service-oriented multi-agent system should be enhanced with biologically inspired techniques, namely self-organization, to reach a truly robust, agile and adaptive system

Utility-Based Mechanism for Structural Self-Organization in Service-Oriented MAS

Structural relations established among agents influence the performance of decentralized service discovery process in multiagent systems. Moreover, distributed systems should be able to adapt their structural relations to changes in environmental conditions. In this article, we present a service-oriented multiagent systems, where agents initially self-organize their structural relations based on the similarity of their services. During the service discovery process, agents integrate a mechanism that facilitates the self-organization of their structural relations to adapt the structure of the system to the service demand. This mechanism facilitates the task of decentralized service discovery and improves its performance. Each agent has local knowledge about its direct neighbors and the queries received during discovery processes. With this information, an agent is able to analyze its structural relations and decide when it is more appropriate to modify its direct neighbors and select the most suitable acquaintances to replace them. The experimental evaluation shows how this self-organization mechanism improves the overall performance of the service discovery process in the system when the service demand changesThis work is partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through grants CSD2007-0022 (CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010), TIN2012-36586-C03-01, TIN2012-36586-C03-01, TIN2012-36586-C03-02, PROMETEOII/2013/019, and FPU grant AP-2008-00601 awarded to E. Del Val.Del Val Noguera, E.; Rebollo Pedruelo, M.; Vasirani, M.; Fernández, A. (2014). Utility-Based Mechanism for Structural Self-Organization in Service-Oriented MAS. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems. 9(3):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2651423S12493Sherief Abdallah and Victor Lesser. 2007. Multiagent reinforcement learning and self-organization in a network of agents. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 172--179.Lada A. Adamic and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2002. Zipf’s law and the Internet. Glottometrics 3, 143--150.Muntasir Al-Asfoor, Brendan Neville, and Maria Fasli. 2012. Heuristic resource search in a self-organised distributed multi agent system. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Self-Organizing Systems. 84--89.Mathieu Aquin, Salman Elahi, and Enrico Motta. 2010. Personal monitoring of Web information exchange: Towards Web lifelogging. In Proceedings of the Web Science Conference.Ulrich Basters and Matthias Klusch. 2006. RS2D: Fast adaptive search for semantic Web services in unstructured p2p networks. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. 87--100.Umesh Bellur and Roshan Kulkarni. 2007. Improved matchmaking algorithm for semantic Web services based on bipartite graph matching. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. 86--93.Devis Bianchini, Valeria De Antonellis, and Michele Melchiori. 2009. Service-based semantic search in p2p systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Web Services. 7--16.Bartosz Biskupski, Jim Dowling, and Jan Sacha. 2007. Properties and mechanisms of self-organizing MANET and P2P systems. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 2, 1, 1--34.Alberto Blanc, Yi-Kai Liu, and Amin Vahdat. 2005. Designing incentives for peer-to-peer routing. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. 374--385.Michael Bowling and Manuela Veloso. 2002. Multiagent learning using a variable learning rate. Artificial Intelligence 136, 215--250.Frances M. T. Brazier, Jeffrey O. Kephart, H. Van Dyke Parunak, and Michael N. Huhns. 2009. Agents and service-oriented computing for autonomic computing: A research agenda. IEEE Internet Computing 13, 3, 82--87.Tyson Condie, Sepandar D. Kamvar, and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2004. Adaptive peer-to-peer topologies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing. 53--62.Arturo Crespo and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2002. Routing indices for peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 23--32.Elena Del Val, Natalia Criado, Carlos Carrascosa, Vicente Julian, Miguel Rebollo, Estefania Argente, and Vicente Botti. 2010. THOMAS: A service-oriented framework for virtual organizations. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’10). 1631--1632.Elena Del Val, Miguel Rebollo, and Vicente Botti. 2011. Introducing homophily to improve semantic service search in a self-adaptive system. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 1241--1242.Elena Del Val, Miguel Rebollo, and Vicente Botti. 2012a. Enhancing decentralized service discovery in open service-oriented multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 28, 1, 1--30.Elena Del Val, Miguel Rebollo, and Vicente Botti. 2012b. Promoting cooperation in service-oriented MAS through social plasticity and incentives. Journal of Systems and Software 86, 2, 520--537.Gianni Di Caro, Frederick Ducatelle, and Luca Maria Gambardella. 2005. AntHocNet: An adaptive nature-inspired algorithm for routing in mobile ad hoc networks. European Transactions on Telecommunications 16, 443--455.Ding Ding, Lei Liu, and Hartmut Schmeck. 2010. Service discovery in self-organizing service-oriented environments. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference. 717--724.Sergey N. Dorogovtsev and Jose F. F. Mendes. 2003. Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press.Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, and Anthony Karageorgos. 2011. Self-Organizing Software: From Natural to Artificial Adaptation. Natural Computing Series.Erik Einhorn and Andreas Mitschele-Thiel. 2008. RLTE: Reinforcement learning for traffic-engineering. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Infrastructure, Management, and Security. 120--133.Nelson Fernandez, Carlos Maldonado, and Carlos Gershenson. 2014. Information measures of complexity, emergence, self-organization, homeostasis, and autopoiesis. In Guided Self-Organization: Inception. Emergence, Complexity and Computation, Vol. 9. Springer, 19--51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53734-9_2Jose Luis Fernandez-Marquez, Josep Lluis Arcos, and Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo. 2012. A decentralized approach for detecting dynamically changing diffuse event sources in noisy WSN environments. Applied Artificial Intelligence 26, 4, 376--397. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2012.653659Agostino Forestiero, Carlo Mastroianni, and Michela Meo. 2009. Self-Chord: A bio-inspired algorithm for structured P2P systems. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing. 44--51.Matthew E. Gaston and Marie des Jardins. 2005. Agent-organized networks for multi-agent production and exchange. In Proceedings of the 20th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 77--82.Nathan Griffiths and Michael Luck. 2010. Changing neighbours: Improving tag-based cooperation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 249--256.Peter Haase, Ronny Siebes, and Frank van Harmelen. 2008. Expertise-based peer selection in peer-to-peer networks. Knowledge and Information Systems 15, 1, 75--107.Philip N. Howard, Lee Rainee, and Steve Jones. 2001. Days and nights on the Internet. American Behavioural Scientist, 383--404.Bernardo A. Huberman and Lada A. Adamic. 2000. The nature of markets in the WWW. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 1, 5--12.Michael N. Huhns et al. 2005. Research directions for service-oriented multiagent systems. IEEE Internet Computing 9, 6, 65--70.Tomoko Itao, Tatsuya Suda, Tetsuya Nakamura, Miyuki Imada, Masato Matsuo, and Tomonori Aoyama. 2001. Jack-in-the-Net: Adaptive networking architecture for service emergence. In Proceedings of the Asian-Pacific Conference on Communications. 9.Emily M. Jin, Michelle Girvan, and Mark E. J. Newman. 2001. Structure of growing social networks. Physical Review E 64, 4, 046132.Sachin Kamboj and Keith S. Decker. 2007. Organizational self-design in semi-dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 335--337.Rahamatullah Khondoker, S. M. Taslim Arif, Nathan Kerr, and Dennis Schwerdel. 2011. Self-organizing communication services in future network architectures. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Self-Organizing Systems.Matthias Klusch, Benedikt Fries, and Katia Sycara. 2009. OWLS-MX: A hybrid Semantic Web service matchmaker for OWL-S services. Web Semantics Science Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7, 2, 121--133.Dionisis Kontominas, Paraskevi Raftopoulou, Christos Tryfonopoulos, and Euripides G. M. Petrakis. 2013. DS4: A distributed social and semantic search system. Advances in Information Retrieval 7814, 832--836.Ramachandra Kota, Nicholas Gibbins, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2012. Decentralized approaches for self-adaptation in agent organizations. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 7, 1, Article No. 1.Paul Lazarsfeld. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and Control in Modern Society. Van Nostrand, New York, NY.Paulo Leito. 2013. Towards self-organized service-oriented multi-agent systems. In Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 472. Springer, 41--56.W. Sabrina Lin, Hong Vikcy Zhao, and K. J. Ray Liu. 2009. Incentive cooperation strategies for peer-to-peer live multimedia streaming social networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 11, 3, 396--412.Sheila A. McIlraith, Tran Cao Son, and Honglei Zeng. 2001. Semantic Web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 2, 46--53.Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 415--444.Vivek Nallur and Rami Bahsoon. 2012. A decentralized self-adaptation mechanism for service-based applications in the cloud. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 99, 591--612.Aris Ouksel, Yair Babad, and Thomas Tesch. 2004. Matchmaking software agents in B2B markets. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1--9.Massimo Paolucci, Takahiro Kawamura, Terry R. Payne, and Katia P. Sycara. 2002. Semantic matching of Web services capabilities. In Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference. 333--347.Leonid Peshkin and Virginia Savova. 2002. Reinforcement learning for adaptive routing. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’02). 1825--1830.Paraskevi Raftopoulou and Euripides G. M. Petrakis. 2008. iCluster: A self-organizing overlay network for P2P information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR’08). 65--76.Sharmila Savarimuthu, Maryam Purvis, Martin Purvis, and Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu. 2011. Mechanisms for the self-organization of peer groups in agent societies. In Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6532. Springer, 93--107.Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, and Anthony Karageorgos. 2005. Self-organization in multi-agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 20, 2, 165--189.Abdul Khalique Shaikh, Saadat M. Alhashmi, and Rajendran Parthiban. 2012. A semantic impact in decentralized resource discovery mechanism for grid computing environments. In Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7440. Springer, 206--216.Qixiang Sun and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2004. SLIC: A selfish link-based incentive mechanism for unstructured peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’04). 506--515.Mirko Viroli and Franco Zambonelli. 2010. A biochemical approach to adaptive service ecosystems. Information Sciences 180, 10, 1876--1892. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.11.021Li Wang. 2011. SoFA: An expert-driven, self-organization peer-to-peer semantic communities for network resource management. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 1, 94--105.Kevin Werbach. 2000. Syndication—the emerging model for business in the Internet era. Harvard Business Review 78, 3, 84--93, 214.Tom Wolf and Tom Holvoet. 2005. Emergence versus self-organisation: Different concepts but promising when combined. In Engineering Self-Organising Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3464. Springer, 1--15.Haizheng Zhang, W. Bruce Croft, Brian Levine, and Victor Lesser. 2004. A multi-agent approach for peer-to-peer based information retrieval system. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 1. 456--463.Ming Zhong. 2006. Popularity-biased random walks for peer-to-peer search under the square-root principle. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems

Integrating hardware agents into an enhanced multi-agent architecture for Ambient Intelligence systems

Ambient Intelligence (AmI) systems require the integration of complex and innovative solutions. In this sense, agents and multi-agent systems have characteristics such as autonomy, reasoning, reactivity, social abilities and pro-activity which make them appropriate for developing distributed systems based on Ambient Intelligence. In addition, the use of context-aware technologies is an essential aspect in these developments in order to perceive stimuli from the context and react to it autonomously. This paper presents the integration of the Hardware-Embedded Reactive Agents (HERA) Platform into the Flexible and User Services Oriented Multi-agent Architecture (FUSION@), a multi-agent architecture for developing AmI systems that integrates intelligent agents with a service-oriented architecture approach. Because of this integration, FUSION@ has the ability to manage both software and hardware agents by using self-adaptable heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Preliminary results presented in this paper demonstrate the feasibility of FUSION@ as a future alternative for developing Ambient Intelligence systems where users and systems can use both software and hardware agents in a transparent way, achieving a higher level of ubiquitous computing and communication

Object-oriented Tools for Distributed Computing

Distributed computing systems are proliferating, owing to the availability of powerful, affordable microcomputers and inexpensive communication networks. A critical problem in developing such systems is getting application programs to interact with one another across a computer network. Remote interprogram connectivity is particularly challenging across heterogeneous environments, where applications run on different kinds of computers and operating systems. NetWorks! (trademark) is an innovative software product that provides an object-oriented messaging solution to these problems. This paper describes the design and functionality of NetWorks! and illustrates how it is being used to build complex distributed applications for NASA and in the commercial sector

Digital Ecosystems: Ecosystem-Oriented Architectures

We view Digital Ecosystems to be the digital counterparts of biological ecosystems. Here, we are concerned with the creation of these Digital Ecosystems, exploiting the self-organising properties of biological ecosystems to evolve high-level software applications. Therefore, we created the Digital Ecosystem, a novel optimisation technique inspired by biological ecosystems, where the optimisation works at two levels: a first optimisation, migration of agents which are distributed in a decentralised peer-to-peer network, operating continuously in time; this process feeds a second optimisation based on evolutionary computing that operates locally on single peers and is aimed at finding solutions to satisfy locally relevant constraints. The Digital Ecosystem was then measured experimentally through simulations, with measures originating from theoretical ecology, evaluating its likeness to biological ecosystems. This included its responsiveness to requests for applications from the user base, as a measure of the ecological succession (ecosystem maturity). Overall, we have advanced the understanding of Digital Ecosystems, creating Ecosystem-Oriented Architectures where the word ecosystem is more than just a metaphor.Comment: 39 pages, 26 figures, journa