100 research outputs found

    Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse

    Full text link
    The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation. In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data, source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses. Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is a feasible but challenging task.Comment: Cite as: Habernal, I. & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics 43(1), pp. 125-17

    Identifying power relationships in dialogues

    Get PDF
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2011.This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.Cataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 175-179).Understanding power relationships is an important step towards building computers that can understand human social relationships. Power relationships can arise due to dierences in the roles of the speakers, as between bosses and employees. Power can also affect the manner of communication between social equals, as between friends or acquaintances. There are numerous potential uses for an automatic system that can understand power relationships. These include: the analysis of the organizational structure of formal and ad-hoc groups, the profiling of in influential individuals within a group, or identifying aggressive or power-inappropriate language in email or other Internet media. In this thesis, we explore the problem of engineering eective power identication systems. We show methods for constructing an eective ground truth corpus for analyzing power. We focus on three areas of modeling that help in improving the prediction of power relationships. 1) Utterance Level Language Cues - patterns of language use can help distinguish the speech of leaders or followers. We show a set of eective syntactic/semantic features that best capture these linguistic manifestations of power. 2) Dialog Level Interactions - the manner of interaction between speakers can inform us about the underlying power dynamics. We use Hidden Markov Models to organize and model the information from these interaction-based cues. 3) Social conventions - speaker behavior is in influenced by their background knowledge, in particular, conventional rules of communication. We use a generative hierarchical Bayesian framework to model dialogs as mental processes; then we extend these models to include components that encode basic social conventions such as politeness. We apply our integrated system, PRISM, on the Nixon Watergate Transcripts, to demonstrate that our system can perform robustly on real world data.by Yuan Kui Shen.Ph.D

    Generating automated meeting summaries

    Get PDF
    The thesis at hand introduces a novel approach for the generation of abstractive summaries of meetings. While the automatic generation of document summaries has been studied for some decades now, the novelty of this thesis is mainly the application to the meeting domain (instead of text documents) as well as the use of a lexicalized representation formalism on the basis of Frame Semantics. This allows us to generate summaries abstractively (instead of extractively).Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt einen neuartigen Ansatz zur Generierung abstraktiver Zusammenfassungen von Gruppenbesprechungen vor. Während automatische Textzusammenfassungen bereits seit einigen Jahrzehnten erforscht werden, liegt die Neuheit dieser Arbeit vor allem in der Anwendungsdomäne (Gruppenbesprechungen statt Textdokumenten), sowie der Verwendung eines lexikalisierten Repräsentationsformulism auf der Basis von Frame-Semantiken, der es erlaubt, Zusammenfassungen abstraktiv (statt extraktiv) zu generieren. Wir argumentieren, dass abstraktive Ansätze für die Zusammenfassung spontansprachlicher Interaktionen besser geeignet sind als extraktive

    Proceedings

    Get PDF
    Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories. Editors: Markus Dickinson, Kaili Müürisep and Marco Passarotti. NEALT Proceedings Series, Vol. 9 (2010), 268 pages. © 2010 The editors and contributors. Published by Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT) http://omilia.uio.no/nealt . Electronically published at Tartu University Library (Estonia) http://hdl.handle.net/10062/15891
    corecore