Quantum and Classical Message Identification via Quantum Channels

We discuss concepts of message identification in the sense of Ahlswede and Dueck via general quantum channels, extending investigations for classical channels, initial work for classical-quantum (cq) channels and "quantum fingerprinting". We show that the identification capacity of a discrete memoryless quantum channel for classical information can be larger than that for transmission; this is in contrast to all previously considered models, where it turns out to equal the common randomness capacity (equals transmission capacity in our case): in particular, for a noiseless qubit, we show the identification capacity to be 2, while transmission and common randomness capacity are 1. Then we turn to a natural concept of identification of quantum messages (i.e. a notion of "fingerprint" for quantum states). This is much closer to quantum information transmission than its classical counterpart (for one thing, the code length grows only exponentially, compared to double exponentially for classical identification). Indeed, we show how the problem exhibits a nice connection to visible quantum coding. Astonishingly, for the noiseless qubit channel this capacity turns out to be 2: in other words, one can compress two qubits into one and this is optimal. In general however, we conjecture quantum identification capacity to be different from classical identification capacity.Comment: 18 pages, requires Rinton-P9x6.cls. On the occasion of Alexander Holevo's 60th birthday. Version 2 has a few theorems knocked off: Y Steinberg has pointed out a crucial error in my statements on simultaneous ID codes. They are all gone and replaced by a speculative remark. The central results of the paper are all unharmed. In v3: proof of Proposition 17 corrected, without change of its statemen

Identification via Quantum Channels in the Presence of Prior Correlation and Feedback

Continuing our earlier work (quant-ph/0401060), we give two alternative proofs of the result that a noiseless qubit channel has identification capacity 2: the first is direct by a "maximal code with random extension" argument, the second is by showing that 1 bit of entanglement (which can be generated by transmitting 1 qubit) and negligible (quantum) communication has identification capacity 2. This generalises a random hashing construction of Ahlswede and Dueck: that 1 shared random bit together with negligible communication has identification capacity 1. We then apply these results to prove capacity formulas for various quantum feedback channels: passive classical feedback for quantum-classical channels, a feedback model for classical-quantum channels, and "coherent feedback" for general channels.Comment: 19 pages. Requires Rinton-P9x6.cls. v2 has some minor errors/typoes corrected and the claims of remark 22 toned down (proofs are not so easy after all). v3 has references to simultaneous ID coding removed: there were necessary changes in quant-ph/0401060. v4 (final form) has minor correction

Capacities of classical compound quantum wiretap and classical quantum compound wiretap channels

We determine the capacity of the classical compound quantum wiretapper channel with channel state information at the transmitter. Moreover we derive a lower bound on the capacity of this channel without channel state information and determine the capacity of the classical quantum compound wiretap channel with channel state information at the transmitter

Addendum to: "Strong converse for identification via quantum channels"

Winter A, Ahlswede R. Addendum to: "Strong converse for identification via quantum channels". IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 2003;49(1):346-346