1,246 research outputs found

    Multi-Parametric Extremum Seeking-based Auto-Tuning for Robust Input-Output Linearization Control

    Full text link
    We study in this paper the problem of iterative feedback gains tuning for a class of nonlinear systems. We consider Input-Output linearizable nonlinear systems with additive uncertainties. We first design a nominal Input-Output linearization-based controller that ensures global uniform boundedness of the output tracking error dynamics. Then, we complement the robust controller with a model-free multi-parametric extremum seeking (MES) control to iteratively auto-tune the feedback gains. We analyze the stability of the whole controller, i.e. robust nonlinear controller plus model-free learning algorithm. We use numerical tests to demonstrate the performance of this method on a mechatronics example.Comment: To appear at the IEEE CDC 201

    A novel adaptive PD-type iterative learning control of the PMSM servo system with the friction uncertainty in low speeds

    Get PDF
    High precision demands in a large number of emerging robotic applications strengthened the role of the modern control laws in the position control of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) servo system. This paper proposes a learning-based adaptive control approach to improve the PMSM position tracking in the presence of the friction uncertainty. In contrast to most of the reported works considering the servos operating at high speeds, this paper focuses on low speeds in which the friction stemmed deteriorations become more obvious. In this paper firstly, a servo model involving the Stribeck friction dynamics is formulated, and the unknown friction parameters are identified by a genetic algorithm from the offline data. Then, a feedforward controller is designed to inject the friction information into the loop and eliminate it before causing performance degradations. Since the friction is a kind of disturbance and leads to uncertainties having time-varying characters, an Adaptive Proportional Derivative (APD) type Iterative Learning Controller (ILC) named as the APD-ILC is designed to mitigate the friction effects. Finally, the proposed control approach is simulated in MATLAB/Simulink environment and it is compared with the conventional Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller, Proportional ILC (P-ILC), and Proportional Derivative ILC (PD-ILC) algorithms. The results confirm that the proposed APD-ILC significantly lessens the effects of the friction and thus noticeably improves the control performance in the low speeds of the PMSM

    An Output-Recurrent-Neural-Network-Based Iterative Learning Control for Unknown Nonlinear Dynamic Plants

    Get PDF
    We present a design method for iterative learning control system by using an output recurrent neural network (ORNN). Two ORNNs are employed to design the learning control structure. The first ORNN, which is called the output recurrent neural controller (ORNC), is used as an iterative learning controller to achieve the learning control objective. To guarantee the convergence of learning error, some information of plant sensitivity is required to design a suitable adaptive law for the ORNC. Hence, a second ORNN, which is called the output recurrent neural identifier (ORNI), is used as an identifier to provide the required information. All the weights of ORNC and ORNI will be tuned during the control iteration and identification process, respectively, in order to achieve a desired learning performance. The adaptive laws for the weights of ORNC and ORNI and the analysis of learning performances are determined via a Lyapunov like analysis. It is shown that the identification error will asymptotically converge to zero and repetitive output tracking error will asymptotically converge to zero except the initial resetting error

    ํŠน์ • ์ ์˜ ์ถ”์ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ˆ์ธก์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•™์Šต์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™”ํ•™์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2017. 2. ์ด์ข…๋ฏผ.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํšŒ๋ถ„์‹ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•™์Šต์ œ์–ด(Iterative learning control, ILC)์™€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ˆ์ธก์ œ์–ด(Model predictive control, MPC)๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ˆ์ธก์ œ์–ด(Iterative learning model predictive control, ILMPC)๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ILC๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋”๋ผ๋„ ์ด์ „ ํšŒ๋ถ„์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ถœ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ถค์ ์— ์ˆ˜๋ ด์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฃจํ”„ ์ œ์–ด์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์™ธ๋ž€์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค. MPC๋Š” ์ด์ „ ํšŒ๋ถ„์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ชจ๋“  ํšŒ๋ถ„์—์„œ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ILC์™€ MPC์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์žฅ์ ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ILMPC๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ํšŒ๋ถ„์‹ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ถค์ ์„ ์ถ”์ ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ์—๋งŒ ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ILMPC ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ง€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ถค์ ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์ด ํ•„์š” ์—†๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ ๋Œ€์  ์ถ”์ , ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ํ•™์Šต, ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด, ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์™ธ๋ž€ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.In this thesis, we study an iterative learning control (ILC) technique combined with model predictive control (MPC), called the iterative learning model predictive control (ILMPC), for constrained multivariable control of batch processes. Although the general ILC makes the outputs converge to reference trajectories under model uncertainty, it uses open-loop control within a batchthus, it cannot reject real-time disturbances. The MPC algorithm shows identical performance for all batches, and it highly depends on model quality because it does not use previous batch information. We integrate the advantages of the two algorithms. In many batch or repetitive processes, the output does not need to track all points of a reference trajectory. We propose a novel ILMPC method which can only consider the desired reference points, not an entire reference trajectory. It does not require to generate a reference trajectory which passes through the specific desired points. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the performances of the suggested approach on point-to-point tracking, iterative learning, constraints handling, and real-time disturbance rejection.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Literature Review 4 1.2.1 Iterative Learning Control 4 1.2.2 Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control 15 1.2.3 Iterative Learning Control for Point-to-Point Tracking 17 1.3 Major Contributions of This Thesis 18 1.4 Outline of This Thesis 19 2. Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control 22 2.1 Introduction 22 2.2 Prediction Model for Iterative Learning Model Predictive Control 25 2.2.1 Incremental State-Space Model 25 2.2.2 Prediction Model 30 2.3 Iterative Learning Model Predictive Controller 34 2.3.1 Unconstrained ILMPC 34 2.3.2 Constrained ILMPC 35 2.3.3 Convergence Property 37 2.3.4 Extension for Disturbance Model 42 2.4 Numerical Illustrations 44 2.4.1 (Case 1) Unconstrained and Constrained Linear SISO System 45 2.4.2 (Case 2) Constrained Linear MIMO System 49 2.4.3 (Case 3) Nonlinear Batch Reactor 53 2.5 Conclusion 59 3. Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control for Non-Zero Convergence 60 3.1 Iterative Learning Model Predictive Controller for Nonzero Convergence 60 3.2 Convergence Analysis 63 3.2.1 Convergence Analysis for an Input Trajectory 63 3.2.2 Convergence Analysis for an Output Error 65 3.3 Illustrative Example 71 3.4 Conclusions 75 4. Iterative Learning Control Combined with Model Predictive Control for Tracking Specific Points 77 4.1 Introduction 77 4.2 Point-to-Point Iterative Learning Model Predictive Control 79 4.2.1 Extraction Matrix Formulation 79 4.2.2 Constrained PTP ILMPC 82 4.2.3 Iterative Learning Observer 86 4.3 Convergence Analysis 89 4.3.1 Convergence of Input Trajectory 89 4.3.2 Convergence of Error 95 4.4 Numerical Examples 98 4.4.1 Example 1 (Linear SISO System with Disturbance) 98 4.4.2 Example 2 (Linear SISO System) 104 4.4.3 Example 3 (Comparison between the Proposed PTP ILMPC and PTP ILC) 107 4.4.4 Example 4 (Nonlinear Semi-Batch Reactor) 113 4.5 Conclusion 119 5. Stochastic Iterative Learning Control for Batch-varying Reference Trajectory 120 5.1 Introduction 121 5.2 ILC for Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 123 5.2.1 Convergence Property for ILC with Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 123 5.2.2 Iterative Learning Identification 126 5.2.3 Deterministic ILC Controller for Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 129 5.3 ILC for LTI Stochastic System with Batch-Varying Reference Trajectories 132 5.3.1 Approach1: Batch-Domain Kalman Filter-Based Approach 133 5.3.2 Approach2: Time-Domain Kalman Filter-Based Approach 137 5.4 Numerical Examples 141 5.4.1 Example 1 (Random Reference Trajectories 141 5.4.2 Example 2 (Particular Types of Reference Trajectories 149 5.5 Conclusion 151 6. Conclusions and Future Works 156 6.1 Conclusions 156 6.2 Future work 157 Bibliography 158 ์ดˆ๋ก 170Docto

    Relaxing Fundamental Assumptions in Iterative Learning Control

    Full text link
    Iterative learning control (ILC) is perhaps best decribed as an open loop feedforward control technique where the feedforward signal is learned through repetition of a single task. As the name suggests, given a dynamic system operating on a finite time horizon with the same desired trajectory, ILC aims to iteratively construct the inverse image (or its approximation) of the desired trajectory to improve transient tracking. In the literature, ILC is often interpreted as feedback control in the iteration domain due to the fact that learning controllers use information from past trials to drive the tracking error towards zero. However, despite the significant body of literature and powerful features, ILC is yet to reach widespread adoption by the control community, due to several assumptions that restrict its generality when compared to feedback control. In this dissertation, we relax some of these assumptions, mainly the fundamental invariance assumption, and move from the idea of learning through repetition to two dimensional systems, specifically repetitive processes, that appear in the modeling of engineering applications such as additive manufacturing, and sketch out future research directions for increased practicality: We develop an L1 adaptive feedback control based ILC architecture for increased robustness, fast convergence, and high performance under time varying uncertainties and disturbances. Simulation studies of the behavior of this combined L1-ILC scheme under iteration varying uncertainties lead us to the robust stability analysis of iteration varying systems, where we show that these systems are guaranteed to be stable when the ILC update laws are designed to be robust, which can be done using existing methods from the literature. As a next step to the signal space approach adopted in the analysis of iteration varying systems, we shift the focus of our work to repetitive processes, and show that the exponential stability of a nonlinear repetitive system is equivalent to that of its linearization, and consequently uniform stability of the corresponding state space matrix.PhDElectrical Engineering: SystemsUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133232/1/altin_1.pd

    Norm Optimal Iterative Learning Control with Application to Problems in Accelerator based Free Electron Lasers and Rehabilitation Robotics

    No full text
    This paper gives an overview of the theoretical basis of the norm optimal approach to iterative learning control followed by results that describe more recent work which has experimentally benchmarking the performance that can be achieved. The remainder of then paper then describes its actual application to a physical process and a very novel application in stroke rehabilitation

    Performance Improvement of Low-Cost Iterative Learning-Based Fuzzy Control Systems for Tower Crane Systems

    Get PDF
    This paper is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Ioan Dzitac, one of the fathers of this journal and its founding Editor-in-Chief till 2021. The paper addresses the performance improvement of three Single Input-Single Output (SISO) fuzzy control systems that control separately the positions of interest of tower crane systems, namely the cart position, the arm angular position and the payload position. Three separate low-cost SISO fuzzy controllers are employed in terms of first order discrete-time intelligent Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers with Takagi-Sugeno-Kang Proportional-Derivative (PD) fuzzy terms. Iterative Learning Control (ILC) system structures with PD learning functions are involved in the current iteration SISO ILC structures. Optimization problems are defined in order to tune the parameters of the learning functions. The objective functions are defined as the sums of squared control errors, and they are solved in the iteration domain using the recent metaheuristic Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA). The experimental results prove the performance improvement of the SISO control systems after ten iterations of SMA
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore