Adaptive Task Automata with Earliest-Deadline-First Scheduling

Adjusting to resource changes, dynamic environmental conditions, or new usage modes are some of the reasons why real-time embedded systems need to be adaptive. This requires a rigorous framework for designing such systems, to ensure that the adaptivity does not result in invalidating the system’s real-time constraints. To address this need, we have recently introduced adaptive task automata, a framework for modeling, verification, and schedulability analysis in adaptive, hard real-time embedded systems, assuming a fixed-priority scheduler. In this work, we extend the adaptive task automata framework to incorporate the earliest-deadline-first scheduling policy, as well as enable implementation of any other dynamic scheduling policy. To prove the decidability of our model, and at the same time maintain a manageable degree of conciseness, we show an encoding of our model as a network of timed automata with clock updates. To support this, we also show that reachability in our class of timed automata with updates is decidable. Our contribution helps to streamline the process of designing safety critical adaptive embedded systems

Ordonnancement des systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité

Real-time safety-critical systems must complete their tasks within a given time limit. Failure to successfully perform their operations, or missing a deadline, can have severe consequences such as destruction of property and/or loss of life. Examples of such systems include automotive systems, drones and avionics among others. Safety guarantees must be provided before these systems can be deemed usable. This is usually done through certification performed by a certification authority.Safety evaluation and certification are complicated and costly even for smaller systems.One answer to these difficulties is the isolation of the critical functionality. Executing tasks of different criticalities on separate platforms prevents non-critical tasks from interfering with critical ones, provides a higher guaranty of safety and simplifies the certification process limiting it to only the critical functions. But this separation, in turn, introduces undesirable results portrayed by an inefficient resource utilization, an increase in the cost, weight, size and energy consumption which can put a system in a competitive disadvantage.To overcome the drawbacks of isolation, Mixed Criticality (MC) systems can be used. These systems allow functionalities with different criticalities to execute on the same platform. In 2007, Vestal proposed a model to represent MC-systems where tasks have multiple Worst Case Execution Times (WCETs), one for each criticality level. In addition, correctness conditions for scheduling policies were formally defined, allowing lower criticality jobs to miss deadlines or be even dropped in cases of failure or emergency situations.The introduction of multiple WCETs and different conditions for correctness increased the difficulty of the scheduling problem for MC-systems. Conventional scheduling policies and schedulability tests proved inadequate and the need for new algorithms arose. Since then, a lot of work has been done in this field.In this thesis, we contribute to the study of schedulability in MC-systems. The workload of a system is represented as a set of jobs that can describe the execution over the hyper-period of tasks or over a duration in time. This model allows us to study the viability of simulation-based correctness tests in MC-systems. We show that simulation tests can still be used in mixed-criticality systems, but in this case, the schedulability of the worst case scenario is no longer sufficient to guarantee the schedulability of the system even for the fixed priority scheduling case. We show that scheduling policies are not predictable in general, and define the concept of weak-predictability for MC-systems. We prove that a specific class of fixed priority policies are weakly predictable and propose two simulation-based correctness tests that work for weakly-predictable policies.We also demonstrate that contrary to what was believed, testing for correctness can not be done only through a linear number of preemptions.The majority of the related work focuses on systems of two criticality levels due to the difficulty of the problem. But for automotive and airborne systems, industrial standards define four or five criticality levels, which motivated us to propose a scheduling algorithm that schedules mixed-criticality systems with theoretically any number of criticality levels. We show experimentally that it has higher success rates compared to the state of the art.We illustrate how our scheduling algorithm, or any algorithm that generates a single time-triggered table for each criticality mode, can be used as a recovery strategy to ensure the safety of the system in case of certain failures.Finally, we propose a high level concurrency language and a model for designing an MC-system with coarse grained multi-core interference.Les systèmes temps-réel critiques doivent exécuter leurs tâches dans les délais impartis. En cas de défaillance, des événements peuvent avoir des catastrophes économiques. Des classifications des défaillances par rapport aux niveaux des risques encourus ont été établies, en particulier dans les domaines des transports aéronautique et automobile. Des niveaux de criticité sont attribués aux différentes fonctions des systèmes suivant les risques encourus lors d'une défaillance et des probabilités d'apparition de celles-ci. Ces différents niveaux de criticité influencent les choix d'architecture logicielle et matérielle ainsi que le type de composants utilisés pour sa réalisation. Les systèmes temps-réels modernes ont tendance à intégrer sur une même plateforme de calcul plusieurs applications avec différents niveaux de criticité. Cette intégration est nécessaire pour des systèmes modernes comme par exemple les drones (UAV) afin de réduire le coût, le poids et la consommation d'énergie. Malheureusement, elle conduit à des difficultés importantes lors de leurs conceptions. En plus, ces systèmes doivent être certifiés en prenant en compte ces différents niveaux de criticités.Il est bien connu que le problème d'ordonnancement des systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticités représente un des plus grand défi dans le domaine de systèmes temps-réel. Les techniques traditionnelles proposent comme solution l’isolation complète entre les niveaux de criticité ou bien une certification globale au plus haut niveau. Malheureusement, une telle solution conduit à une mauvaise des ressources et à la perte de l’avantage de cette intégration. En 2007, Vestal a proposé un modèle pour représenter les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité dont les tâches ont plusieurs temps d’exécution, un pour chaque niveau de criticité. En outre, les conditions de validité des stratégies d’ordonnancement ont été définies de manière formelle, permettant ainsi aux tâches les moins critiques d’échapper aux délais, voire d’être abandonnées en cas de défaillance ou de situation d’urgence.Les politiques de planification conventionnelles et les tests d’ordonnoncement se sont révélés inadéquats.Dans cette thèse, nous contribuons à l’étude de l’ordonnancement dans les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité. La surcharge d'un système est représentée sous la forme d'un ensemble de tâches pouvant décrire l'exécution sur l'hyper-période de tâches ou sur une durée donnée. Ce modèle nous permet d’étudier la viabilité des tests de correction basés sur la simulation pour les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité. Nous montrons que les tests de simulation peuvent toujours être utilisés pour ces systèmes, et la possibilité de l’ordonnancement du pire des scénarios ne suffit plus, même pour le cas de l’ordonnancement avec priorité fixe. Nous montrons que les politiques d'ordonnancement ne sont généralement pas prévisibles. Nous définissons le concept de faible prévisibilité pour les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité et nous montrons ensuite qu'une classe spécifique de stratégies à priorité fixe sont faiblement prévisibles. Nous proposons deux tests de correction basés sur la simulation qui fonctionnent pour des stratégies faiblement prévisibles.Nous montrons également que, contrairement à ce que l’on croyait, le contrôle de l’exactitude ne peut se faire que par l’intermédiaire d’un nombre linéaire de préemptions.La majorité des travaux reliés à notre domaine portent sur des systèmes à deux niveaux de criticité en raison de la difficulté du problème. Mais pour les systèmes automobiles et aériens, les normes industrielles définissent quatre ou cinq niveaux de criticité, ce qui nous a motivés à proposer un algorithme de planification qui planifie les systèmes à criticité mixte avec théoriquement un nombre quelconque de niveaux de criticité. Nous montrons expérimentalement que le taux de réussite est supérieur à celui de l’état de la technique

Automated competitive analysis of real time scheduling with graph games

This paper is devoted to automatic competitive analysis of real-time scheduling algorithms for firm-deadline tasksets, where only completed tasks con- tribute some utility to the system. Given such a taskset T , the competitive ratio of an on-line scheduling algorithm A for T is the worst-case utility ratio of A over the utility achieved by a clairvoyant algorithm. We leverage the theory of quantitative graph games to address the competitive analysis and competitive synthesis problems. For the competitive analysis case, given any taskset T and any finite-memory on- line scheduling algorithm A , we show that the competitive ratio of A in T can be computed in polynomial time in the size of the state space of A . Our approach is flexible as it also provides ways to model meaningful constraints on the released task sequences that determine the competitive ratio. We provide an experimental study of many well-known on-line scheduling algorithms, which demonstrates the feasibility of our competitive analysis approach that effectively replaces human ingenuity (required Preliminary versions of this paper have appeared in Chatterjee et al. ( 2013 , 2014 ). B Andreas Pavlogiannis [email protected] Krishnendu Chatterjee [email protected] Alexander Kößler [email protected] Ulrich Schmid [email protected] 1 IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria 2 Embedded Computing Systems Group, Vienna University of Technology, Treitlstrasse 3, 1040 Vienna, Austria 123 Real-Time Syst for finding worst-case scenarios) by computing power. For the competitive synthesis case, we are just given a taskset T , and the goal is to automatically synthesize an opti- mal on-line scheduling algorithm A , i.e., one that guarantees the largest competitive ratio possible for T . We show how the competitive synthesis problem can be reduced to a two-player graph game with partial information, and establish that the compu- tational complexity of solving this game is Np -complete. The competitive synthesis problem is hence in Np in the size of the state space of the non-deterministic labeled transition system encoding the taskset. Overall, the proposed framework assists in the selection of suitable scheduling algorithms for a given taskset, which is in fact the most common situation in real-time systems design

IST Austria Technical Report

We present a flexible framework for the automated competitive analysis of on-line scheduling algorithms for firm- deadline real-time tasks based on multi-objective graphs: Given a taskset and an on-line scheduling algorithm specified as a labeled transition system, along with some optional safety, liveness, and/or limit-average constraints for the adversary, we automatically compute the competitive ratio of the algorithm w.r.t. a clairvoyant scheduler. We demonstrate the flexibility and power of our approach by comparing the competitive ratio of several on-line algorithms, including D(over), that have been proposed in the past, for various tasksets. Our experimental results reveal that none of these algorithms is universally optimal, in the sense that there are tasksets where other schedulers provide better performance. Our framework is hence a very useful design tool for selecting optimal algorithms for a given application

Energy harvesting earliest deadline first scheduling algorithm for increasing lifetime of real time systems

In this paper, a new approach for energy minimization in energy harvesting real time systems has been investigated. Lifetime of a real time systems is depend upon its battery life.  Energy is a parameter by which the lifetime of system can be enhanced.  To work continuously and successively, energy harvesting is used as a regular source of energy. EDF (Earliest Deadline First) is a traditional real time tasks scheduling algorithm and DVS (Dynamic Voltage Scaling) is used for reducing energy consumption. In this paper, we propose an Energy Harvesting Earliest Deadline First (EH-EDF) scheduling algorithm for increasing lifetime of real time systems using DVS for reducing energy consumption and EDF for tasks scheduling with energy harvesting as regular energy supply. Our experimental results show that the proposed approach perform better to reduce energy consumption and increases the system lifetime as compared with existing approaches.

Application of learning algorithms to traffic management in integrated services networks.

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DXN027131 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

A Semantic Framework for Mode Change Protocols

We present a unified framework for the specification and analysis of mode-change protocols used in multi-mode realtime systems. We propose a highly expressive formalism, called MCP, to model the system behavior during mode transitions, and show how various existing mode change protocols can be described as MCPs. The explicit representation of the MCP model provides a means to analyze the system state during a mode transition as well as during an intra-mode execution. We introduce the concept of feasibility with respect to the MCP model, and give a decidable method for checking the feasibility of a MCP for a given multi-mode system. The formalization of mode change behaviors using the MCP model allows a range of mode change protocols to be modeled, evaluated, and optimized to the specific operations and performance requirements of the system. Besides feasibility analysis, it is also possible to analyze other system behaviors (e.g., delay between modes, buffer backlog) using automata verification techniques. Our framework can also be used to describe mode change semantics of multi-mode systems whose modes/transitions have different criticality levels, or of systems composed of multiple multi-mode components that require different mode change protocols

Cost-Effective Scheduling and Load Balancing Algorithms in Cloud Computing Using Learning Automata

Cloud computing is a distributed computing model in which access is based on demand. A cloud computing environment includes a wide variety of resource suppliers and consumers. Hence, efficient and effective methods for task scheduling and load balancing are required. This paper presents a new approach to task scheduling and load balancing in the cloud computing environment with an emphasis on the cost-efficiency of task execution through resources. The proposed algorithms are based on the fair distribution of jobs between machines, which will prevent the unconventional increase in the price of a machine and the unemployment of other machines. The two parameters Total Cost and Final Cost are designed to achieve the mentioned goal. Applying these two parameters will create a fair basis for job scheduling and load balancing. To implement the proposed approach, learning automata are used as an effective and efficient technique in reinforcement learning. Finally, to show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms we conducted simulations using CloudSim toolkit and compared proposed algorithms with other existing algorithms like BCO, PES, CJS, PPO and MCT. The proposed algorithms can balance the Final Cost and Total Cost of machines. Also, the proposed algorithms outperform best existing algorithms in terms of efficiency and imbalance degree

Analysis of Embedded Controllers Subject to Computational Overruns

Microcontrollers have become an integral part of modern everyday embedded systems, such as smart bikes, cars, and drones. Typically, microcontrollers operate under real-time constraints, which require the timely execution of programs on the resource-constrained hardware. As embedded systems are becoming increasingly more complex, microcontrollers run the risk of violating their timing constraints, i.e., overrunning the program deadlines. Breaking these constraints can cause severe damage to both the embedded system and the humans interacting with the device. Therefore, it is crucial to analyse embedded systems properly to ensure that they do not pose any significant danger if the microcontroller overruns a few deadlines.However, there are very few tools available for assessing the safety and performance of embedded control systems when considering the implementation of the microcontroller. This thesis aims to fill this gap in the literature by presenting five papers on the analysis of embedded controllers subject to computational overruns. Details about the real-time operating system's implementation are included into the analysis, such as what happens to the controller's internal state representation when the timing constraints are violated. The contribution includes theoretical and computational tools for analysing the embedded system's stability, performance, and real-time properties.The embedded controller is analysed under three different types of timing violations: blackout events (when no control computation is completed during long periods), weakly-hard constraints (when the number of deadline overruns is constrained over a window), and stochastic overruns (when violations of timing constraints are governed by a probabilistic process). These scenarios are combined with different implementation policies to reduce the gap between the analysis and its practical applicability. The analyses are further validated with a comprehensive experimental campaign performed on both a set of physical processes and multiple simulations.In conclusion, the findings of this thesis reveal that the effect deadline overruns have on the embedded system heavily depends the implementation details and the system's dynamics. Additionally, the stability analysis of embedded controllers subject to deadline overruns is typically conservative, implying that additional insights can be gained by also analysing the system's performance