4,946 research outputs found
A review of domain adaptation without target labels
Domain adaptation has become a prominent problem setting in machine learning
and related fields. This review asks the question: how can a classifier learn
from a source domain and generalize to a target domain? We present a
categorization of approaches, divided into, what we refer to as, sample-based,
feature-based and inference-based methods. Sample-based methods focus on
weighting individual observations during training based on their importance to
the target domain. Feature-based methods revolve around on mapping, projecting
and representing features such that a source classifier performs well on the
target domain and inference-based methods incorporate adaptation into the
parameter estimation procedure, for instance through constraints on the
optimization procedure. Additionally, we review a number of conditions that
allow for formulating bounds on the cross-domain generalization error. Our
categorization highlights recurring ideas and raises questions important to
further research.Comment: 20 pages, 5 figure
Owl and Lizard: Patterns of Head Pose and Eye Pose in Driver Gaze Classification
Accurate, robust, inexpensive gaze tracking in the car can help keep a driver
safe by facilitating the more effective study of how to improve (1) vehicle
interfaces and (2) the design of future Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. In
this paper, we estimate head pose and eye pose from monocular video using
methods developed extensively in prior work and ask two new interesting
questions. First, how much better can we classify driver gaze using head and
eye pose versus just using head pose? Second, are there individual-specific
gaze strategies that strongly correlate with how much gaze classification
improves with the addition of eye pose information? We answer these questions
by evaluating data drawn from an on-road study of 40 drivers. The main insight
of the paper is conveyed through the analogy of an "owl" and "lizard" which
describes the degree to which the eyes and the head move when shifting gaze.
When the head moves a lot ("owl"), not much classification improvement is
attained by estimating eye pose on top of head pose. On the other hand, when
the head stays still and only the eyes move ("lizard"), classification accuracy
increases significantly from adding in eye pose. We characterize how that
accuracy varies between people, gaze strategies, and gaze regions.Comment: Accepted for Publication in IET Computer Vision. arXiv admin note:
text overlap with arXiv:1507.0476
- …