Metasemantics and fuzzy mathematics

The present thesis is an inquiry into the metasemantics of natural languages, with a particular focus on the philosophical motivations for countenancing degreed formal frameworks for both psychosemantics and truth-conditional semantics. Chapter 1 sets out to offer a bird's eye view of our overall research project and the key questions that we set out to address. Chapter 2 provides a self-contained overview of the main empirical findings in the cognitive science of concepts and categorisation. This scientific background is offered in light of the fact that most variants of psychologically-informed semantics see our network of concepts as providing the raw materials on which lexical and sentential meanings supervene. Consequently, the metaphysical study of internalistically-construed meanings and the empirical study of our mental categories are overlapping research projects. Chapter 3 closely investigates a selection of species of conceptual semantics, together with reasons for adopting or disavowing them. We note that our ultimate aim is not to defend these perspectives on the study of meaning, but to argue that the project of making them formally precise naturally invites the adoption of degreed mathematical frameworks (e.g. probabilistic or fuzzy). In Chapter 4, we switch to the orthodox framework of truth-conditional semantics, and we present the limitations of a philosophical position that we call "classicism about vagueness". In the process, we come up with an empirical hypothesis for the psychological pull of the inductive soritical premiss and we make an original objection against the epistemicist position, based on computability theory. Chapter 5 makes a different case for the adoption of degreed semantic frameworks, based on their (quasi-)superior treatments of the paradoxes of vagueness. Hence, the adoption of tools that allow for graded membership are well-motivated under both semantic internalism and semantic externalism. At the end of this chapter, we defend an unexplored view of vagueness that we call "practical fuzzicism". Chapter 6, viz. the final chapter, is a metamathematical enquiry into both the fuzzy model-theoretic semantics and the fuzzy Davidsonian semantics for formal languages of type-free truth in which precise truth-predications can be expressed

Automated Reasoning

This volume, LNAI 13385, constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, IJCAR 2022, held in Haifa, Israel, in August 2022. The 32 full research papers and 9 short papers presented together with two invited talks were carefully reviewed and selected from 85 submissions. The papers focus on the following topics: Satisfiability, SMT Solving,Arithmetic; Calculi and Orderings; Knowledge Representation and Jutsification; Choices, Invariance, Substitutions and Formalization; Modal Logics; Proofs System and Proofs Search; Evolution, Termination and Decision Prolems. This is an open access book

Computational Complexity of Strong Admissibility for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as a formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation allowing general logical satisfaction conditions. Different criteria used to settle the acceptance of arguments arecalled semantics. Semantics of ADFs have so far mainly been defined based on the concept of admissibility. Recently, the notion of strong admissibility has been introduced for ADFs. In the current work we study the computational complexityof the following reasoning tasks under strong admissibility semantics. We address 1. the credulous/skeptical decision problem; 2. the verification problem; 3. the strong justification problem; and 4. the problem of finding a smallest witness of strong justification of a queried argument

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas

Aspects of emergent cyclicity in language and computation

This thesis has four parts, which correspond to the presentation and development of a theoretical framework for the study of cognitive capacities qua physical phenomena, and a case study of locality conditions over natural languages. Part I deals with computational considerations, setting the tone of the rest of the thesis, and introducing and defining critical concepts like ‘grammar’, ‘automaton’, and the relations between them . Fundamental questions concerning the place of formal language theory in linguistic inquiry, as well as the expressibility of linguistic and computational concepts in common terms, are raised in this part. Part II further explores the issues addressed in Part I with particular emphasis on how grammars are implemented by means of automata, and the properties of the formal languages that these automata generate. We will argue against the equation between effective computation and function-based computation, and introduce examples of computable procedures which are nevertheless impossible to capture using traditional function-based theories. The connection with cognition will be made in the light of dynamical frustrations: the irreconciliable tension between mutually incompatible tendencies that hold for a given dynamical system. We will provide arguments in favour of analyzing natural language as emerging from a tension between different systems (essentially, semantics and morpho-phonology) which impose orthogonal requirements over admissible outputs. The concept of level of organization or scale comes to the foreground here; and apparent contradictions and incommensurabilities between concepts and theories are revisited in a new light: that of dynamical nonlinear systems which are fundamentally frustrated. We will also characterize the computational system that emerges from such an architecture: the goal is to get a syntactic component which assigns the simplest possible structural description to sub-strings, in terms of its computational complexity. A system which can oscillate back and forth in the hierarchy of formal languages in assigning structural representations to local domains will be referred to as a computationally mixed system. Part III is where the really fun stuff starts. Field theory is introduced, and its applicability to neurocognitive phenomena is made explicit, with all due scale considerations. Physical and mathematical concepts are permanently interacting as we analyze phrase structure in terms of pseudo-fractals (in Mandelbrot’s sense) and define syntax as a (possibly unary) set of topological operations over completely Hausdorff (CH) ultrametric spaces. These operations, which makes field perturbations interfere, transform that initial completely Hausdorff ultrametric space into a metric, Hausdorff space with a weaker separation axiom. Syntax, in this proposal, is not ‘generative’ in any traditional sense –except the ‘fully explicit theory’ one-: rather, it partitions (technically, ‘parametrizes’) a topological space. Syntactic dependencies are defined as interferences between perturbations over a field, which reduce the total entropy of the system per cycles, at the cost of introducing further dimensions where attractors corresponding to interpretations for a phrase marker can be found. Part IV is a sample of what we can gain by further pursuing the physics of language approach, both in terms of empirical adequacy and theoretical elegance, not to mention the unlimited possibilities of interdisciplinary collaboration. In this section we set our focus on island phenomena as defined by Ross (1967), critically revisiting the most relevant literature on this topic, and establishing a typology of constructions that are strong islands, which cannot be violated. These constructions are particularly interesting because they limit the phase space of what is expressible via natural language, and thus reveal crucial aspects of its underlying dynamics. We will argue that a dynamically frustrated system which is characterized by displaying mixed computational dependencies can provide straightforward characterizations of cyclicity in terms of changes in dependencies in local domains