33,665 research outputs found
Crowdsourcing in Computer Vision
Computer vision systems require large amounts of manually annotated data to
properly learn challenging visual concepts. Crowdsourcing platforms offer an
inexpensive method to capture human knowledge and understanding, for a vast
number of visual perception tasks. In this survey, we describe the types of
annotations computer vision researchers have collected using crowdsourcing, and
how they have ensured that this data is of high quality while annotation effort
is minimized. We begin by discussing data collection on both classic (e.g.,
object recognition) and recent (e.g., visual story-telling) vision tasks. We
then summarize key design decisions for creating effective data collection
interfaces and workflows, and present strategies for intelligently selecting
the most important data instances to annotate. Finally, we conclude with some
thoughts on the future of crowdsourcing in computer vision.Comment: A 69-page meta review of the field, Foundations and Trends in
Computer Graphics and Vision, 201
Much Ado About Time: Exhaustive Annotation of Temporal Data
Large-scale annotated datasets allow AI systems to learn from and build upon
the knowledge of the crowd. Many crowdsourcing techniques have been developed
for collecting image annotations. These techniques often implicitly rely on the
fact that a new input image takes a negligible amount of time to perceive. In
contrast, we investigate and determine the most cost-effective way of obtaining
high-quality multi-label annotations for temporal data such as videos. Watching
even a short 30-second video clip requires a significant time investment from a
crowd worker; thus, requesting multiple annotations following a single viewing
is an important cost-saving strategy. But how many questions should we ask per
video? We conclude that the optimal strategy is to ask as many questions as
possible in a HIT (up to 52 binary questions after watching a 30-second video
clip in our experiments). We demonstrate that while workers may not correctly
answer all questions, the cost-benefit analysis nevertheless favors consensus
from multiple such cheap-yet-imperfect iterations over more complex
alternatives. When compared with a one-question-per-video baseline, our method
is able to achieve a 10% improvement in recall 76.7% ours versus 66.7%
baseline) at comparable precision (83.8% ours versus 83.0% baseline) in about
half the annotation time (3.8 minutes ours compared to 7.1 minutes baseline).
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by collecting multi-label
annotations of 157 human activities on 1,815 videos.Comment: HCOMP 2016 Camera Read
Empirical Methodology for Crowdsourcing Ground Truth
The process of gathering ground truth data through human annotation is a
major bottleneck in the use of information extraction methods for populating
the Semantic Web. Crowdsourcing-based approaches are gaining popularity in the
attempt to solve the issues related to volume of data and lack of annotators.
Typically these practices use inter-annotator agreement as a measure of
quality. However, in many domains, such as event detection, there is ambiguity
in the data, as well as a multitude of perspectives of the information
examples. We present an empirically derived methodology for efficiently
gathering of ground truth data in a diverse set of use cases covering a variety
of domains and annotation tasks. Central to our approach is the use of
CrowdTruth metrics that capture inter-annotator disagreement. We show that
measuring disagreement is essential for acquiring a high quality ground truth.
We achieve this by comparing the quality of the data aggregated with CrowdTruth
metrics with majority vote, over a set of diverse crowdsourcing tasks: Medical
Relation Extraction, Twitter Event Identification, News Event Extraction and
Sound Interpretation. We also show that an increased number of crowd workers
leads to growth and stabilization in the quality of annotations, going against
the usual practice of employing a small number of annotators.Comment: in publication at the Semantic Web Journa
Crowdsourcing Semantic Label Propagation in Relation Classification
Distant supervision is a popular method for performing relation extraction
from text that is known to produce noisy labels. Most progress in relation
extraction and classification has been made with crowdsourced corrections to
distant-supervised labels, and there is evidence that indicates still more
would be better. In this paper, we explore the problem of propagating human
annotation signals gathered for open-domain relation classification through the
CrowdTruth methodology for crowdsourcing, that captures ambiguity in
annotations by measuring inter-annotator disagreement. Our approach propagates
annotations to sentences that are similar in a low dimensional embedding space,
expanding the number of labels by two orders of magnitude. Our experiments show
significant improvement in a sentence-level multi-class relation classifier.Comment: In publication at the First Workshop on Fact Extraction and
Verification (FeVer) at EMNLP 201
A mathematical framework for combining decisions of multiple experts toward accurate and remote diagnosis of malaria using tele-microscopy.
We propose a methodology for digitally fusing diagnostic decisions made by multiple medical experts in order to improve accuracy of diagnosis. Toward this goal, we report an experimental study involving nine experts, where each one was given more than 8,000 digital microscopic images of individual human red blood cells and asked to identify malaria infected cells. The results of this experiment reveal that even highly trained medical experts are not always self-consistent in their diagnostic decisions and that there exists a fair level of disagreement among experts, even for binary decisions (i.e., infected vs. uninfected). To tackle this general medical diagnosis problem, we propose a probabilistic algorithm to fuse the decisions made by trained medical experts to robustly achieve higher levels of accuracy when compared to individual experts making such decisions. By modelling the decisions of experts as a three component mixture model and solving for the underlying parameters using the Expectation Maximisation algorithm, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach which significantly improves the overall diagnostic accuracy of malaria infected cells. Additionally, we present a mathematical framework for performing 'slide-level' diagnosis by using individual 'cell-level' diagnosis data, shedding more light on the statistical rules that should govern the routine practice in examination of e.g., thin blood smear samples. This framework could be generalized for various other tele-pathology needs, and can be used by trained experts within an efficient tele-medicine platform
- …