A Tale of Two DRAGGNs: A Hybrid Approach for Interpreting Action-Oriented and Goal-Oriented Instructions

Robots operating alongside humans in diverse, stochastic environments must be able to accurately interpret natural language commands. These instructions often fall into one of two categories: those that specify a goal condition or target state, and those that specify explicit actions, or how to perform a given task. Recent approaches have used reward functions as a semantic representation of goal-based commands, which allows for the use of a state-of-the-art planner to find a policy for the given task. However, these reward functions cannot be directly used to represent action-oriented commands. We introduce a new hybrid approach, the Deep Recurrent Action-Goal Grounding Network (DRAGGN), for task grounding and execution that handles natural language from either category as input, and generalizes to unseen environments. Our robot-simulation results demonstrate that a system successfully interpreting both goal-oriented and action-oriented task specifications brings us closer to robust natural language understanding for human-robot interaction.Comment: Accepted at the 1st Workshop on Language Grounding for Robotics at ACL 201

A Tale of Two DRAGGNs: A Hybrid Approach for Interpreting Action-Oriented and Goal-Oriented Instructions

Robots operating alongside humans in diverse, stochastic environments must be able to accurately interpret natural language commands. These instructions often fall into one of two categories: those that specify a goal condition or target state, and those that specify explicit actions, or how to perform a given task. Recent approaches have used reward functions as a semantic representation of goal-based commands, which allows for the use of a state-of-the-art planner to find a policy for the given task. However, these reward functions cannot be directly used to represent action-oriented commands. We introduce a new hybrid approach, the Deep Recurrent Action-Goal Grounding Network (DRAGGN), for task grounding and execution that handles natural language from either category as input, and generalizes to unseen environments. Our robot-simulation results demonstrate that a system successfully interpreting both goal-oriented and action-oriented task specifications brings us closer to robust natural language understanding for human-robot interaction.Comment: Accepted at the 1st Workshop on Language Grounding for Robotics at ACL 201

Specifying and Interpreting Reinforcement Learning Policies through Simulatable Machine Learning

Human-AI collaborative policy synthesis is a procedure in which (1) a human initializes an autonomous agent's behavior, (2) Reinforcement Learning improves the human specified behavior, and (3) the agent can explain the final optimized policy to the user. This paradigm leverages human expertise and facilitates a greater insight into the learned behaviors of an agent. Existing approaches to enabling collaborative policy specification involve black box methods which are unintelligible and are not catered towards non-expert end-users. In this paper, we develop a novel collaborative framework to enable humans to initialize and interpret an autonomous agent's behavior, rooted in principles of human-centered design. Through our framework, we enable humans to specify an initial behavior model in the form of unstructured, natural language, which we then convert to lexical decision trees. Next, we are able to leverage these human-specified policies, to warm-start reinforcement learning and further allow the agent to optimize the policies through reinforcement learning. Finally, to close the loop on human-specification, we produce explanations of the final learned policy, in multiple modalities, to provide the user a final depiction about the learned policy of the agent. We validate our approach by showing that our model can produce >80% accuracy, and that human-initialized policies are able to successfully warm-start RL. We then conduct a novel human-subjects study quantifying the relative subjective and objective benefits of varying XAI modalities(e.g., Tree, Language, and Program) for explaining learned policies to end-users, in terms of usability and interpretability and identify the circumstances that influence these measures. Our findings emphasize the need for personalized explainable systems that can facilitate user-centric policy explanations for a variety of end-users

Vision-Language Interpreter for Robot Task Planning

Large language models (LLMs) are accelerating the development of language-guided robot planners. Meanwhile, symbolic planners offer the advantage of interpretability. This paper proposes a new task that bridges these two trends, namely, multimodal planning problem specification. The aim is to generate a problem description (PD), a machine-readable file used by the planners to find a plan. By generating PDs from language instruction and scene observation, we can drive symbolic planners in a language-guided framework. We propose a Vision-Language Interpreter (ViLaIn), a new framework that generates PDs using state-of-the-art LLM and vision-language models. ViLaIn can refine generated PDs via error message feedback from the symbolic planner. Our aim is to answer the question: How accurately can ViLaIn and the symbolic planner generate valid robot plans? To evaluate ViLaIn, we introduce a novel dataset called the problem description generation (ProDG) dataset. The framework is evaluated with four new evaluation metrics. Experimental results show that ViLaIn can generate syntactically correct problems with more than 99% accuracy and valid plans with more than 58% accuracy