93,436 research outputs found

    Shelah's Categoricity Conjecture from a successor for Tame Abstract Elementary Classes

    Full text link
    Let K be an Abstract Elemenetary Class satisfying the amalgamation and the joint embedding property, let \mu be the Hanf number of K. Suppose K is tame. MAIN COROLLARY: (ZFC) If K is categorical in a successor cardinal bigger than \beth_{(2^\mu)^+} then K is categorical in all cardinals greater than \beth_{(2^\mu)^+}. This is an improvment of a Theorem of Makkai and Shelah ([Sh285] who used a strongly compact cardinal for the same conclusion) and Shelah's downward categoricity theorem for AECs with amalgamation (from [Sh394]).Comment: 19 page

    Limit Models in Strictly Stable Abstract Elementary Classes

    Full text link
    In this paper, we examine the locality condition for non-splitting and determine the level of uniqueness of limit models that can be recovered in some stable, but not superstable, abstract elementary classes. In particular we prove: Suppose that KK is an abstract elementary class satisfying 1. the joint embedding and amalgamation properties with no maximal model of cardinality μ\mu. 2. stabilty in μ\mu. 3. κμ(K)<μ+\kappa_{\mu}(K)<\mu^+. 4. continuity for non-μ\mu-splitting (i.e. if p∈gS(M)p\in gS(M) and MM is a limit model witnessed by ⟨Mi∣i<α⟩\langle M_i\mid i<\alpha\rangle for some limit ordinal α<μ+\alpha<\mu^+ and there exists NN so that p↾Mip\restriction M_i does not μ\mu-split over NN for all i<αi<\alpha, then pp does not μ\mu-split over NN). For θ\theta and δ\delta limit ordinals <μ+<\mu^+ both with cofinality ≥κμ(K)\geq \kappa_{\mu}(K), if KK satisfies symmetry for non-μ\mu-splitting (or just (μ,δ)(\mu,\delta)-symmetry), then, for any M1M_1 and M2M_2 that are (μ,θ)(\mu,\theta) and (μ,δ)(\mu,\delta)-limit models over M0M_0, respectively, we have that M1M_1 and M2M_2 are isomorphic over M0M_0.Comment: This article generalizes some results from arXiv:1507.0199
    • …
    corecore