A review of literature on the use of clickers in the business and management discipline

YesClassroom response systems (clickers), in their various forms, are widely used across disciplines, demonstrating effectiveness across a range of different educational settings. However, only a few literature reviews on this technology have been undertaken in general, and no review has yet been performed on this topic in the business and management context. Realising the existing research gap, this article reviews 33 clicker-related studies from the business and management discipline that are largely focused on student perceptions and outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical and balanced review of articles from the business and management discipline on various themes such as learner's engagement, performance, learning, participation, satisfaction, feedback, attendance, enjoyability, motivation, and interactivity, to name a few. The review also provides a brief account of lessons learned from the literature published in other disciplines and recommendations provided by studies from the business and management discipline

A longitudinal study of web-based homework

This study examines the nature of web-based homework (WBH) by identifying the various factors inherent in the WBH learning environment and their impact on the performance of students. A primary contribution of this study is the longitudinal nature of the research to investigate how student perceptions change during the course of an academic semester. Our working definition of WBH is a web-based learning environment where students solve homework problems and receive instantaneous feedback on their progress and performance. Current research does not know the answer to critical questions such as: What are the factors in a WBH learning environment? What is its impact on student learning? How does this impact change during the course of an academic term? Based on the literature review, several theories from four disciplines, including education, psychology, technology and sociology were used to develop a theory-driven view of the WBH learning environment. The data suggest that mastery motives, engagement, locus of control, performance goals, self-efficacy, technical-efficacy, usefulness, lazy user, frustration, cooperative learning, perceived ability and GPA are relevant factors in a WBH learning environment and they impact student performance through the course of an academic semester. This study also found that the strength of these relationships change over the course of the semester. Future research will extend the study across disciplines and student bodies to extend the generalizability of the study

The Impact of a Classroom Performance System on Learning Gains in a Biology Course for Science Majors

This study was conducted to determine if the use of the technology known as Classroom Performance System (CPS), specifically referred to as “Clickers”, improves the learning gains of students enrolled in a biology course for science majors. CPS is one of a group of developing technologies adapted for providing feedback in the classroom using a learner-centered approach. It supports and facilitates discussion among students and between them and teachers, and provides for participation by passive students. Advocates, influenced by constructivist theories, claim increased academic achievement. In science teaching, the results have been mixed, but there is some evidence of improvements in conceptual understanding. The study employed a pretest-posttest, non-equivalent groups experimental design. The sample consisted of 226 participants in six sections of a college biology course at a large community college in South Florida with two instructors trained in the use of clickers. Each instructor randomly selected their sections into CPS (treatment) and non-CPS (control) groups. All participants filled out a survey that included demographic data at the beginning of the semester. The treatment group used clicker questions throughout, with discussions as necessary, whereas the control groups answered the same questions as quizzes, similarly engaging in discussion where necessary. The learning gains were assessed on a pre/post-test basis. The average learning gains, defined as the actual gain divided by the possible gain, were slightly better in the treatment group than in the control group, but the difference was statistically non-significant. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) statistic with pretest scores as the covariate was conducted to test for significant differences between the treatment and control groups on the posttest. A second ANCOVA was used to determine the significance of differences between the treatment and control groups on the posttest scores, after controlling for sex, GPA, academic status, experience with clickers, and instructional style. The results indicated a small increase in learning gains but these were not statistically significant. The data did not support an increase in learning based on the use of the CPS technology. This study adds to the body of research that questions whether CPS technology merits classroom adaptation

Research and Creative Activity, July 1, 2019-June 30, 2020: Major Sponsored Programs and Faculty Accomplishments in Research and Creative Activity, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Foreword by Bob Wilhelm, Vice Chancellor for Research and Economic Development: This booklet highlights successes in research, scholarship and creative activity by University of Nebraska–Lincoln faculty during the fiscal year running July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. It lists investigators, project titles and funding sources on major grants and sponsored awards received during the year; fellowships and other recognitions and honors bestowed on our faculty; books published by faculty; performances, exhibitions and other creative activity; and patents and licensing agreements issued. Based on your feedback, the Office of Research and Economic Development expanded this publication to include peer-reviewed journal articles and conference presentations and recognize students and faculty mentors participating in the Undergraduate Creative Activities and Research Experience Program (UCARE) and the First-Year Research Experiences program (FYRE). While metrics cannot convey the full story of our work, they are tangible measures of impact. Nebraska achieved a record $317 million in total research expenditures in FY 2019, a 26$450 million in research expenditures by 2025. Husker researchers are stimulating economic growth through university-sponsored industry activity. Nebraska Innovation Campus created 1,657 jobs statewide and had a total economic impact of $324.1 million in FY 2019. NUtech Ventures brought in$6.6 million in licensing income in FY 2020. The University of Nebraska system now ranks 65th among the top 100 academic institutions receiving U.S. patents, jumping 14 spots from 2019. I am proud of the Nebraska Research community for facing the challenges of 2020 with grit and determination. Our researchers quickly adapted to develop solutions for an evolving pandemic — all while working apart and keeping themselves and their families safe. As an institution, we made a commitment to embrace an anti-racism journey and work toward racial equity. Advancing conversations and developing lasting solutions is among the most important work we can do as scholars. Against the backdrop of the pandemic, rising racial and social tensions, and natural disasters, Nebraska researchers worked diligently to address other pressing issues, such as obesity and related diseases, nanomaterials, agricultural resilience and the state’s STEM workforce. Let’s continue looking forward to what we can accomplish together. Thank you for participating in the grand challenges process and helping identify the wicked problems that Nebraska has unique expertise to solve. Soon, ORED will unveil a Research Roadmap that outlines how our campus will develop research expertise; enrich creative activity; bolster commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion; enhance economic development; and much more. Amidst the uncertainty of 2020, I remain confident in our faculty’s talent and commitment. I am pleased to present this record of accomplishments. Contents Awards of $5 Million or More Awards of$1 Million to $4,999,999 Awards of$250,000 to $999,999 Early Career Awards Arts and Humanities Awards of$250,000 or More Arts and Humanities Awards of $50,000 to$249,999 Arts and Humanities Awards of $5,000 to$49,999 Patents License Agreements Creative Activity Books Recognitions and Honors Journal Articles Conference Presentations UCARE and FYRE Projects Glossar

A Comparison of Rewarded Responses versus Nonincentivized Responses Using Clickers as a More Defined Method of Feedback

Audience response systems (ARS), clickers, when used in classrooms are said to improve a myriad of learning outcomes, including engagement, retaining information, student involvement and class attendance. The purpose of this research was to determine if audience response systems improve classroom learning outcomes, as measured by how it measures attendance, pre and post-knowledge, and performance assessments. This study took place in four sections of Introduction to Human Communication, all taught by the same instructor at a comprehensive university in the southeastern United States. A 2 x 2 quasi-experimental design was employed, with three of the classes randomly assigned a condition, and a fourth class randomly assigned as the control group. Students in the three sections with conditions were given questions during the daily class lectures. Of the three sections with a condition, one answered the questions on paper and received points, the second used clickers to answer the questions and received points, and the third used clickers to answer questions and did not receive points. The fourth group, the control group, was not given any questions during the same lecture. For the two classes that received points for correctly answering questions during the lecture, the points available from the questions accounted for .06% of the final grade. The study also looked at student attendance to determine if points given during the lecture for the three conditions resulted in fewer absences. In addition, scores from a pre and post-test, and pre and post-speech, were used to determine if learning was improved equally across the four sections.TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………… 1 Audience Response System Use…………………………………………….. 1 Purpose of Study…………………………………………………………….. 6 A Brief Look Back…………………………………………………………... 8 Audience Response System Products……………………………………….. 12 Challenges in Selecting an ARS Provider…………………………………... 15 Introduction to the Problem…………………………………………………. 19 Research Questions………………………………………………………….. 19 II. LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………… 22 Audience Response Systems Through The Years…………………………... 22 Audience Response Systems and Learning Theories……………………….. 39 How Clickers Impact Learning……………………………………………… 41 Motivation…………………………………………………………………… 42 III. METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………….. 46 Operational Definitions and Research Design………………………………. 46 Instruments…………………………………………………………………... 47 Participants…………………………………………………………………... 48 Procedure……………………………………………………………………. 49 IV. RESULTS……………………………………………………………………. 49 Demographics……………………………………………………………….. 57 Attendance…………………………………………………………………… 61 Pre and Post Test…………………………………………………………….. 63 Pre and Post Speech…………………………………………………………. 61 Final Course Grades…………………………………………………………. 67 V. DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………... 70 Attendance…………………………………………………………………… 70 Pre and Post Test…………………………………………………………….. 73 Pre and Post Speech…………………………………………………………. 74 Final Course Grades…………………………………………………………. 76 Future Research……………………………………………………………… 76 Implications………………………………………………………………….. 80 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………. 81 APPENDICES Appendix A: Institutional Review Board Protocol Exemption Report……... 91 Appendix B: Consent to Participate in Research…………………………… 93 Appendix C: Opt-Out Email Sent to Students……………………………… 97 Appendix D: Pre-Post Test…………………………………………………. 99 Appendix E: Pre-Post Speech Grading Rubric……………………………... 109Hilgon, LarryLowney, KathleenBrowne, BlaineSiegrist, GeraldEd.D.Educatio

Integrating e-learning technologies into conventional teaching and learning in the school and higher education system with scarce resources: a case study of Mzuzu University

The main aim of this study was to investigate how secondary schools and tertiary education institutions in Malawi can sustainably integrate e-learning technologies into traditional teaching and learning environments. The study was conducted in Malawi at Mzuzu University (MZUNI) and four secondary schools within Mzuzu City. Data were collected in two phases. Phase-one was a baseline study of the status of technology at MZUNI and in four conveniently sampled secondary schools in Mzuzu City. The rationale for conducting the baseline study was to ascertain the status of e-learning before conducting the intervention study. This phase used self-administered questionnaires, focus group discussions (FDGs) and in-depth individual interviews as tools for gathering data. Phase Two was interventional in nature because the researcher tried to implement some solutions which were observed during baseline study. This study used a longitudinal qualitative research approach. A mixed methods approach was used because the nature of the research questions required the use of different data gathering strategies. Study findings revealed that educational institutions that have limited resources can integrate technology in education by using resources they have. This study discovered that the following five media were sustainable and the most used technologies: The Internet, Facebook, memory sticks, personal computers and ordinary cell phones. Furthermore, challenges that institutions are likely to face when implementing technology integration included: intermittent electrical power supply; lack of resources for e-learning; resistance to use recorded e-resources; challenges with e-module production and using WhatsApp for educational purposes. The study recommends the following strategies to ensure that electronic technologies are integrated into the teaching and learning environment: MZUNI and other institutions which have limited resources for teaching and learning purposes should integrate technology in education using the most ubiquitous teaching and learning resources around them by making use of the Teaching and Learning Using Locally Available Resources (TALULAR) concept instead of solely relying on proprietary resources

Digital connection in a physical classroom: clickers and the student-teacher relationship

Education is fundamentally relational, and the student-teacher relationship is central to student learning. However, high-enrollment classrooms, now common on college campuses, limit student-faculty interaction and opportunities for relationship building. “Clickers” facilitate communication in large classes, but there is a lack of research on the potential relational functions of this technology. This study addresses this gap in the literature by asking: How might the use of clickers in the classroom contribute to the student-teacher relationship? Employing a mixed-method descriptive research design, I created and analyzed three data sets to respond to this question: I observed 3 large clicker-based classes, surveyed students to explore their perceptions of clicker use and student-teacher relational dimensions, and I interviewed a subset of students for assistance interpreting the results. Data analyses resulted in four general findings: clickers can be used for multiple purposes and ends; clickers facilitate aspects of the student-teacher pedagogical relationship; clicker communication is not perceived as comprising a student-teacher relationship; and clickers are viewed as a tool for collective rather than individual communication and dialogue. Clickers may have value as relational tools, as they facilitate some aspects of the student-teacher relationship. The frame of the technology may explain why only some relational dimensions are facilitated, and not others. More research is needed to explore how clickers and other educational technologies may facilitate the student-teacher relationship