2,227 research outputs found
Arena: A General Evaluation Platform and Building Toolkit for Multi-Agent Intelligence
Learning agents that are not only capable of taking tests, but also
innovating is becoming a hot topic in AI. One of the most promising paths
towards this vision is multi-agent learning, where agents act as the
environment for each other, and improving each agent means proposing new
problems for others. However, existing evaluation platforms are either not
compatible with multi-agent settings, or limited to a specific game. That is,
there is not yet a general evaluation platform for research on multi-agent
intelligence. To this end, we introduce Arena, a general evaluation platform
for multi-agent intelligence with 35 games of diverse logics and
representations. Furthermore, multi-agent intelligence is still at the stage
where many problems remain unexplored. Therefore, we provide a building toolkit
for researchers to easily invent and build novel multi-agent problems from the
provided game set based on a GUI-configurable social tree and five basic
multi-agent reward schemes. Finally, we provide Python implementations of five
state-of-the-art deep multi-agent reinforcement learning baselines. Along with
the baseline implementations, we release a set of 100 best agents/teams that we
can train with different training schemes for each game, as the base for
evaluating agents with population performance. As such, the research community
can perform comparisons under a stable and uniform standard. All the
implementations and accompanied tutorials have been open-sourced for the
community at https://sites.google.com/view/arena-unity/
Ludii -- The Ludemic General Game System
While current General Game Playing (GGP) systems facilitate useful research
in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for game-playing, they are often somewhat
specialised and computationally inefficient. In this paper, we describe the
"ludemic" general game system Ludii, which has the potential to provide an
efficient tool for AI researchers as well as game designers, historians,
educators and practitioners in related fields. Ludii defines games as
structures of ludemes -- high-level, easily understandable game concepts --
which allows for concise and human-understandable game descriptions. We
formally describe Ludii and outline its main benefits: generality,
extensibility, understandability and efficiency. Experimentally, Ludii
outperforms one of the most efficient Game Description Language (GDL)
reasoners, based on a propositional network, in all games available in the
Tiltyard GGP repository. Moreover, Ludii is also competitive in terms of
performance with the more recently proposed Regular Boardgames (RBG) system,
and has various advantages in qualitative aspects such as generality.Comment: Accepted at ECAI 202
Heuristics in Multi-Winner Approval Voting
In many real world situations, collective decisions are made using voting.
Moreover, scenarios such as committee or board elections require voting rules
that return multiple winners. In multi-winner approval voting (AV), an agent
may vote for as many candidates as they wish. Winners are chosen by tallying up
the votes and choosing the top- candidates receiving the most votes. An
agent may manipulate the vote to achieve a better outcome by voting in a way
that does not reflect their true preferences. In complex and uncertain
situations, agents may use heuristics to strategize, instead of incurring the
additional effort required to compute the manipulation which most favors them.
In this paper, we examine voting behavior in multi-winner approval voting
scenarios with complete information. We show that people generally manipulate
their vote to obtain a better outcome, but often do not identify the optimal
manipulation. Instead, voters tend to prioritize the candidates with the
highest utilities. Using simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of these
heuristics in situations where agents only have access to partial information
- …