296 research outputs found

    Comparison of Statistical Methods for Modeling Count Data with an Application to Length of Hospital Stay

    Get PDF
    Hospital length of stay (LOS) is a key indicator of hospital care management efficiency, cost of care, and hospital planning. Therefore, understanding hospital LOS variability is always an important healthcare focus. Hospital LOS data are count data, with discrete and nonnegative values, typically right-skewed, and often exhibiting excessive zeros. Numerous studies have been conducted to model hospital LOS to identify significant predictors contributing to its variability. Many researchers have used linear regression with or without logarithmic transformation of the outcome variable LOS, or logistic regression on a dichotomized LOS. These regression methods usually violate models’ assumptions and are subject to criticism for their inadequacy in modeling count data. Problems that may occur include biased parameter estimates, loss of precision of inferences, predicting meaningless negative values, and loss of important information about the underlying counts. Common statistical methods for the analysis of count data are Poisson, negative binomial (NB), zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP), and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regressions. Many studies have been conducted comparing the performance of regression models for count data. However, the results from the analysis of empirical and/or simulated count data are in much disagreement. In this study, we compared the performance of Poisson, NB, ZIP, and ZINB regression models using simulated data under different scenarios with varying sample sizes, proportions of zeros, and levels of overdispersion. To illustrate the aforementioned regression methods, an analysis of hospital LOS was conducted using empirical data from the MIMIC-III database

    Comparative spending of medicaid dollars on child participants of Kentucky’s sobriety treatment and recovery teams program versus a matched comparison group.

    Get PDF
    Child protective services agencies have long observed the complicating role that parental substance use and addiction plays in cases of child maltreatment. Families who struggle with these problems present unique challenges for child welfare professionals. These families are typically more difficult to engage, more likely to have children removed from the home, and have poorer outcomes when compared to other families. These poorer outcomes often include health problems. Addiction has well-known effects on health, and the specific manifestations of these problems for parents have been documented for years in child protection casework. However, what has been less investigated are the ways that these issues correspond to the health of the children involved in these cases. In many instances, children in these homes are severely injured and require acute medical care. These harms commonly result in significant increases in public spending; especially for state Medicaid programs. In Kentucky, the Cabinet for Health and Family Services created special child welfare units called Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams (START) to serve families where children have been harmed as a result of their parent’s substance use. Previous research efforts suggest that families who participate in START have more favorable outcomes than comparable families who received standard services. These past efforts have even documented cost savings attributable to the work of START in the form of fewer days spent in out of home care for children. This study aimed to expand on that past research by investigating whether similar costs savings are also being generated in the form of reduced Medicaid spending on the children whose parents received START services
    • …
    corecore