Collaborative simulation method with spatiotemporal synchronization process control

When designing a complex mechatronics system, such as high speed trains, it is relatively difficult to effectively simulate the entire system’s dynamic behaviors because it involves multi-disciplinary subsystems. Currently, a most practical approach for multi-disciplinary simulation is interface based coupling simulation method, but it faces a twofold challenge: spatial and time unsynchronizations among multi-directional coupling simulation of subsystems. A new collaborative simulation method with spatiotemporal synchronization process control is proposed for coupling simulating a given complex mechatronics system across multiple subsystems on different platforms. The method consists of 1) a coupler-based coupling mechanisms to define the interfacing and interaction mechanisms among subsystems, and 2) a simulation process control algorithm to realize the coupling simulation in a spatiotemporal synchronized manner. The test results from a case study show that the proposed method 1) can certainly be used to simulate the sub-systems interactions under different simulation conditions in an engineering system, and 2) effectively supports multi-directional coupling simulation among multi-disciplinary subsystems. This method has been successfully applied in China high speed train design and development processes, demonstrating that it can be applied in a wide range of engineering systems design and simulation with improved efficiency and effectiveness

Network Target Coordination for Design Optimization of Decomposed Systems

A complex engineered system is often decomposed into a number of different subsystems that interact on one another and together produce results not obtainable by the subsystems alone. Effective coordination of the interdependencies shared among these subsystems is critical to fulfill the stakeholder expectations and technical requirements of the original system. The past research has shown that various coordination methods obtain different solution accuracies and exhibit different computational efficiencies when solving a decomposed system. Addressing these coordination decisions may lead to improved complex system design. This dissertation studies coordination methods through two types of decomposition structures, hierarchical, and nonhierarchical. For coordinating hierarchically decomposed systems, linear and proximal cutting plane methods are applied based on augmented Lagrangian relaxation and analytical target cascading (ATC). Three nonconvex, nonlinear design problems are used to verify the numerical performance of the proposed coordination method and the obtained results are compared to traditional update schemes of subgradient-based algorithm. The results suggest that the cutting plane methods can significantly improve the solution accuracy and computational efficiency of the hierarchically decomposed systems. In addition, a biobjective optimization method is also used to capture optimality and feasibility. The numerical performance of the biobjective algorithm is verified by solving an analytical mass allocation problem. For coordinating nonhierarchically decomposed complex systems, network target coordination (NTC) is developed by modeling the distributed subsystems as different agents in a network. To realize parallel computing of the subsystems, NTC via a consensus alternating direction method of multipliers is applied to eliminate the use of the master problem, which is required by most distributed coordination methods. In NTC, the consensus is computed using a locally update scheme, providing the potential to realize an asynchronous solution process. The numerical performance of NTC is verified using a geometrical programming problem and two engineering problems

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Space Applications

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has been increasingly studied in aerospace engineering with the main purpose of reducing monetary and schedule costs. The traditional design approach of optimizing each discipline separately and manually iterating to achieve good solutions is substituted by exploiting the interactions between the disciplines and concurrently optimizing every subsystem. The target of the research was the development of a flexible software suite capable of concurrently optimizing the design of a rocket propellant launch vehicle for multiple objectives. The possibility of combining the advantages of global and local searches have been exploited in both the MDO architecture and in the selected and self developed optimization methodologies. Those have been compared according to computational efficiency and performance criteria. Results have been critically analyzed to identify the most suitable optimization approach for the targeted MDO problem

APPROXIMATION ASSISTED MULTIOBJECTIVE AND COLLABORATIVE ROBUST OPTIMIZATION UNDER INTERVAL UNCERTAINTY

Optimization of engineering systems under uncertainty often involves problems that have multiple objectives, constraints and subsystems. The main goal in these problems is to obtain solutions that are optimum and relatively insensitive to uncertainty. Such solutions are called robust optimum solutions. Two classes of such problems are considered in this dissertation. The first class involves Multi-Objective Robust Optimization (MORO) problems under interval uncertainty. In this class, an entire system optimization problem, which has multiple nonlinear objectives and constraints, is solved by a multiobjective optimizer at one level while robustness of trial alternatives generated by the optimizer is evaluated at the other level. This bi-level (or nested) MORO approach can become computationally prohibitive as the size of the problem grows. To address this difficulty, a new and improved MORO approach under interval uncertainty is developed. Unlike the previously reported bi-level MORO methods, the improved MORO performs robustness evaluation only for optimum solutions and uses this information to iteratively shrink the feasible domain and find the location of robust optimum solutions. Compared to the previous bi-level approach, the improved MORO significantly reduces the number of function calls needed to arrive at the solutions. To further improve the computational cost, the improved MORO is combined with an online approximation approach. This new approach is called Approximation-Assisted MORO or AA-MORO. The second class involves Multiobjective collaborative Robust Optimization (McRO) problems. In this class, an entire system optimization problem is decomposed hierarchically along user-defined domain specific boundaries into system optimization problem and several subsystem optimization subproblems. The dissertation presents a new Approximation-Assisted McRO (AA-McRO) approach under interval uncertainty. AA-McRO uses a single-objective optimization problem to coordinate all system and subsystem optimization problems in a Collaborative Optimization (CO) framework. The approach converts the consistency constraints of CO into penalty terms which are integrated into the subsystem objective functions. In this way, AA-McRO is able to explore the design space and obtain optimum design solutions more efficiently compared to a previously reported McRO. Both AA-MORO and AA-McRO approaches are demonstrated with a variety of numerical and engineering optimization examples. It is found that the solutions from both approaches compare well with the previously reported approaches but require a significantly less computational cost. Finally, the AA-MORO has been used in the development of a decision support system for a refinery case study in order to facilitate the integration of engineering and business decisions using an agent-based approach

State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods

Aerodynamic optimisation has become an indispensable component for any aerodynamic design over the past 60 years, with applications to aircraft, cars, trains, bridges, wind turbines, internal pipe flows, and cavities, among others, and is thus relevant in many facets of technology. With advancements in computational power, automated design optimisation procedures have become more competent, however, there is an ambiguity and bias throughout the literature with regards to relative performance of optimisation architectures and employed algorithms. This paper provides a well-balanced critical review of the dominant optimisation approaches that have been integrated with aerodynamic theory for the purpose of shape optimisation. A total of 229 papers, published in more than 120 journals and conference proceedings, have been classified into 6 different optimisation algorithm approaches. The material cited includes some of the most well-established authors and publications in the field of aerodynamic optimisation. This paper aims to eliminate bias toward certain algorithms by analysing the limitations, drawbacks, and the benefits of the most utilised optimisation approaches. This review provides comprehensive but straightforward insight for non-specialists and reference detailing the current state for specialist practitioners

Decoupled UMDO formulation for interdisciplinary coupling satisfaction under uncertainty

International audienceAt early design phases, taking into account uncertainty for the optimization of a multidisciplinary system is essential to establish the optimal system characteristics and performances. Uncertainty Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (UMDO) formulations have to eciently organize the dierent disciplinary analyses, the uncertainty propagation, the optimization, but also the handling of interdisciplinary couplings under uncertainty. A decoupled UMDO formulation (Individual Discipline Feasible - Polynomial Chaos Expansion) ensuring the coupling satisfaction for all the instantiations of the uncertain variables is presented in this paper. Ensuring coupling satisfaction in instantiations is essential to ensure the equivalence between the coupled and decoupled UMDO problem formulations. The proposed approach relies on the iterative construction of surrogate models based on Polynomial Chaos Expansion in order to represent at the convergence of the optimization problem, the coupling functional relations as a coupled approach under uncertainty does. The performances of the proposed formulation is assessed on an analytic test case and on the design of a new Vega launch vehicle upper stage

An augmented Lagrangian coordination method for distributed optimal design in MDO: Part I formulation and algorithms

Quite a number of coordination methods have been proposed for the distributed optimal design of large-scale systems consisting of a number of interacting subsystems. Several coordination methods are known to have numerical convergence difficulties that can be explained theoretically. The methods for which convergence proofs are available have mostly been developed for so called quasi-separable problems (i.e. problems with individual subsystems coupled only through a set of shared variables, not through constraints and/or objectives). In this paper we present a new coordination method for MDO problems with coupling variables as well as coupling objectives and constraints. Our approach employs an augmented Lagrangian penalty relaxation in combination with a block coordinate descent method. The coordination method can be shown to converge to KKT points of the original problem by using existing convergence results. Two formulation variants are presented offering a large degree of freedom in tailoring the coordination algorithm to the design problem at hand. The first centralized variant introduces a master problem to coordinate coupling of the subsystems. The second distributed variant coordinates coupling directly between subsystems. In a sequel paper we demonstrate the flexibility of the formulations, and investigate the numerical behavior of the proposed method