4,634 research outputs found

    Pooling spaces associated with finite geometry

    Get PDF
    AbstractMotivated by the works of Ngo and Du [H. Ngo, D. Du, A survey on combinatorial group testing algorithms with applications to DNA library screening, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 55 (2000) 171–182], the notion of pooling spaces was introduced [T. Huang, C. Weng, Pooling spaces and non-adaptive pooling designs, Discrete Mathematics 282 (2004) 163–169] for a systematic way of constructing pooling designs; note that geometric lattices are among pooling spaces. This paper attempts to draw possible connections from finite geometry and distance regular graphs to pooling spaces: including the projective spaces, the affine spaces, the attenuated spaces, and a few families of geometric lattices associated with the orbits of subspaces under finite classical groups, and associated with d-bounded distance-regular graphs

    Efficient Two-Stage Group Testing Algorithms for Genetic Screening

    Full text link
    Efficient two-stage group testing algorithms that are particularly suited for rapid and less-expensive DNA library screening and other large scale biological group testing efforts are investigated in this paper. The main focus is on novel combinatorial constructions in order to minimize the number of individual tests at the second stage of a two-stage disjunctive testing procedure. Building on recent work by Levenshtein (2003) and Tonchev (2008), several new infinite classes of such combinatorial designs are presented.Comment: 14 pages; to appear in "Algorithmica". Part of this work has been presented at the ICALP 2011 Group Testing Workshop; arXiv:1106.368

    Lower bounds for identifying subset members with subset queries

    Full text link
    An instance of a group testing problem is a set of objects \cO and an unknown subset PP of \cO. The task is to determine PP by using queries of the type ``does PP intersect QQ'', where QQ is a subset of \cO. This problem occurs in areas such as fault detection, multiaccess communications, optimal search, blood testing and chromosome mapping. Consider the two stage algorithm for solving a group testing problem. In the first stage a predetermined set of queries are asked in parallel and in the second stage, PP is determined by testing individual objects. Let n=\cardof{\cO}. Suppose that PP is generated by independently adding each x\in \cO to PP with probability p/np/n. Let q1q_1 (q2q_2) be the number of queries asked in the first (second) stage of this algorithm. We show that if q1=o(log(n)log(n)/loglog(n))q_1=o(\log(n)\log(n)/\log\log(n)), then \Exp(q_2) = n^{1-o(1)}, while there exist algorithms with q1=O(log(n)log(n)/loglog(n))q_1 = O(\log(n)\log(n)/\log\log(n)) and \Exp(q_2) = o(1). The proof involves a relaxation technique which can be used with arbitrary distributions. The best previously known bound is q_1+\Exp(q_2) = \Omega(p\log(n)). For general group testing algorithms, our results imply that if the average number of queries over the course of nγn^\gamma (γ>0\gamma>0) independent experiments is O(n1ϵ)O(n^{1-\epsilon}), then with high probability Ω(log(n)log(n)/loglog(n))\Omega(\log(n)\log(n)/\log\log(n)) non-singleton subsets are queried. This settles a conjecture of Bill Bruno and David Torney and has important consequences for the use of group testing in screening DNA libraries and other applications where it is more cost effective to use non-adaptive algorithms and/or too expensive to prepare a subset QQ for its first test.Comment: 9 page

    Non-adaptive Group Testing on Graphs

    Full text link
    Grebinski and Kucherov (1998) and Alon et al. (2004-2005) study the problem of learning a hidden graph for some especial cases, such as hamiltonian cycle, cliques, stars, and matchings. This problem is motivated by problems in chemical reactions, molecular biology and genome sequencing. In this paper, we present a generalization of this problem. Precisely, we consider a graph G and a subgraph H of G and we assume that G contains exactly one defective subgraph isomorphic to H. The goal is to find the defective subgraph by testing whether an induced subgraph contains an edge of the defective subgraph, with the minimum number of tests. We present an upper bound for the number of tests to find the defective subgraph by using the symmetric and high probability variation of Lov\'asz Local Lemma

    Group Testing with Probabilistic Tests: Theory, Design and Application

    Get PDF
    Identification of defective members of large populations has been widely studied in the statistics community under the name of group testing. It involves grouping subsets of items into different pools and detecting defective members based on the set of test results obtained for each pool. In a classical noiseless group testing setup, it is assumed that the sampling procedure is fully known to the reconstruction algorithm, in the sense that the existence of a defective member in a pool results in the test outcome of that pool to be positive. However, this may not be always a valid assumption in some cases of interest. In particular, we consider the case where the defective items in a pool can become independently inactive with a certain probability. Hence, one may obtain a negative test result in a pool despite containing some defective items. As a result, any sampling and reconstruction method should be able to cope with two different types of uncertainty, i.e., the unknown set of defective items and the partially unknown, probabilistic testing procedure. In this work, motivated by the application of detecting infected people in viral epidemics, we design non-adaptive sampling procedures that allow successful identification of the defective items through a set of probabilistic tests. Our design requires only a small number of tests to single out the defective items. In particular, for a population of size NN and at most KK defective items with activation probability pp, our results show that M=O(K2log(N/K)/p3)M = O(K^2\log{(N/K)}/p^3) tests is sufficient if the sampling procedure should work for all possible sets of defective items, while M=O(Klog(N)/p3)M = O(K\log{(N)}/p^3) tests is enough to be successful for any single set of defective items. Moreover, we show that the defective members can be recovered using a simple reconstruction algorithm with complexity of O(MN)O(MN).Comment: Full version of the conference paper "Compressed Sensing with Probabilistic Measurements: A Group Testing Solution" appearing in proceedings of the 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, 2009 (arXiv:0909.3508). To appear in IEEE Transactions on Information Theor

    Noise-Resilient Group Testing: Limitations and Constructions

    Full text link
    We study combinatorial group testing schemes for learning dd-sparse Boolean vectors using highly unreliable disjunctive measurements. We consider an adversarial noise model that only limits the number of false observations, and show that any noise-resilient scheme in this model can only approximately reconstruct the sparse vector. On the positive side, we take this barrier to our advantage and show that approximate reconstruction (within a satisfactory degree of approximation) allows us to break the information theoretic lower bound of Ω~(d2logn)\tilde{\Omega}(d^2 \log n) that is known for exact reconstruction of dd-sparse vectors of length nn via non-adaptive measurements, by a multiplicative factor Ω~(d)\tilde{\Omega}(d). Specifically, we give simple randomized constructions of non-adaptive measurement schemes, with m=O(dlogn)m=O(d \log n) measurements, that allow efficient reconstruction of dd-sparse vectors up to O(d)O(d) false positives even in the presence of δm\delta m false positives and O(m/d)O(m/d) false negatives within the measurement outcomes, for any constant δ<1\delta < 1. We show that, information theoretically, none of these parameters can be substantially improved without dramatically affecting the others. Furthermore, we obtain several explicit constructions, in particular one matching the randomized trade-off but using m=O(d1+o(1)logn)m = O(d^{1+o(1)} \log n) measurements. We also obtain explicit constructions that allow fast reconstruction in time \poly(m), which would be sublinear in nn for sufficiently sparse vectors. The main tool used in our construction is the list-decoding view of randomness condensers and extractors.Comment: Full version. A preliminary summary of this work appears (under the same title) in proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT 2009

    Group testing problems in experimental molecular biology

    Full text link
    In group testing, the task is to determine the distinguished members of a set of objects L by asking subset queries of the form ``does the subset Q of L contain a distinguished object?'' The primary biological application of group testing is for screening libraries of clones with hybridization probes. This is a crucial step in constructing physical maps and for finding genes. Group testing has also been considered for sequencing by hybridization. Another important application includes screening libraries of reagents for useful chemically active zones. This preliminary report discusses some of the constrained group testing problems which arise in biology.Comment: 7 page

    Optimal Nested Test Plan for Combinatorial Quantitative Group Testing

    Full text link
    We consider the quantitative group testing problem where the objective is to identify defective items in a given population based on results of tests performed on subsets of the population. Under the quantitative group testing model, the result of each test reveals the number of defective items in the tested group. The minimum number of tests achievable by nested test plans was established by Aigner and Schughart in 1985 within a minimax framework. The optimal nested test plan offering this performance, however, was not obtained. In this work, we establish the optimal nested test plan in closed form. This optimal nested test plan is also order optimal among all test plans as the population size approaches infinity. Using heavy-hitter detection as a case study, we show via simulation examples orders of magnitude improvement of the group testing approach over two prevailing sampling-based approaches in detection accuracy and counter consumption. Other applications include anomaly detection and wideband spectrum sensing in cognitive radio systems
    corecore