49,430 research outputs found
Logic Negation with Spiking Neural P Systems
Nowadays, the success of neural networks as reasoning systems is doubtless.
Nonetheless, one of the drawbacks of such reasoning systems is that they work
as black-boxes and the acquired knowledge is not human readable. In this paper,
we present a new step in order to close the gap between connectionist and logic
based reasoning systems. We show that two of the most used inference rules for
obtaining negative information in rule based reasoning systems, the so-called
Closed World Assumption and Negation as Finite Failure can be characterized by
means of spiking neural P systems, a formal model of the third generation of
neural networks born in the framework of membrane computing.Comment: 25 pages, 1 figur
A Review of integrity constraint maintenance and view updating techniques
Two interrelated problems may arise when updating a database. On one
hand, when an update is applied to the database, integrity constraints
may become violated. In such case, the integrity constraint maintenance
approach tries to obtain additional updates to keep integrity
constraints satisfied. On the other hand, when updates of derived or
view facts are requested, a view updating mechanism must be applied to
translate the update request into correct updates of the underlying base
facts.
This survey reviews the research performed on integrity constraint
maintenance and view updating. It is proposed a general framework to
classify and to compare methods that tackle integrity constraint
maintenance and/or view updating. Then, we analyze some of these methods
in more detail to identify their actual contribution and the main
limitations they may present.Postprint (published version
A New Rational Algorithm for View Updating in Relational Databases
The dynamics of belief and knowledge is one of the major components of any
autonomous system that should be able to incorporate new pieces of information.
In order to apply the rationality result of belief dynamics theory to various
practical problems, it should be generalized in two respects: first it should
allow a certain part of belief to be declared as immutable; and second, the
belief state need not be deductively closed. Such a generalization of belief
dynamics, referred to as base dynamics, is presented in this paper, along with
the concept of a generalized revision algorithm for knowledge bases (Horn or
Horn logic with stratified negation). We show that knowledge base dynamics has
an interesting connection with kernel change via hitting set and abduction. In
this paper, we show how techniques from disjunctive logic programming can be
used for efficient (deductive) database updates. The key idea is to transform
the given database together with the update request into a disjunctive
(datalog) logic program and apply disjunctive techniques (such as minimal model
reasoning) to solve the original update problem. The approach extends and
integrates standard techniques for efficient query answering and integrity
checking. The generation of a hitting set is carried out through a hyper
tableaux calculus and magic set that is focused on the goal of minimality.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1301.515
A Rational and Efficient Algorithm for View Revision in Databases
The dynamics of belief and knowledge is one of the major components of any
autonomous system that should be able to incorporate new pieces of information.
In this paper, we argue that to apply rationality result of belief dynamics
theory to various practical problems, it should be generalized in two respects:
first of all, it should allow a certain part of belief to be declared as
immutable; and second, the belief state need not be deductively closed. Such a
generalization of belief dynamics, referred to as base dynamics, is presented,
along with the concept of a generalized revision algorithm for Horn knowledge
bases. We show that Horn knowledge base dynamics has interesting connection
with kernel change and abduction. Finally, we also show that both variants are
rational in the sense that they satisfy certain rationality postulates stemming
from philosophical works on belief dynamics
Recommended from our members
A comparative survey of integrated learning systems
This paper presents the duction framework for unifying the three basic forms of inference - deduction, abduction, and induction - by specifying the possible relationships and influences among them in the context of integrated learning. Special assumptive forms of inference are defined that extend the use of these inference methods, and the properties of these forms are explored. A comparison to a related inference-based learning frame work is made. Finally several existing integrated learning programs are examined in the perspective of the duction framework
A logic programming framework for modeling temporal objects
Published versio
- …