GMM and present value test of the C-CAPM under transactions costs: Evidence from the UK stock market

In this paper we test for the inclusion of the bid-ask spread in the consumption CAPM, in the UK stock market over the time period of 1980-2000. Two econometric models are used; first, Fisher’s (1994) asset pricing model is estimated by GMM, and secondly, the VAR approach proposed by Campbell and Shiller is extended to include the bid-ask spread. Overall the statistical tests are unable to reject the bid-ask spread as an independent explanatory variable in the C-CAPM. This leads to the conclusion that transactions costs should be included in asset pricing models

Spectrum Trading: An Abstracted Bibliography

This document contains a bibliographic list of major papers on spectrum trading and their abstracts. The aim of the list is to offer researchers entering this field a fast panorama of the current literature. The list is continually updated on the webpage \url{http://www.disp.uniroma2.it/users/naldi/Ricspt.html}. Omissions and papers suggested for inclusion may be pointed out to the authors through e-mail (\textit{[email protected]})

Optimal portfolio selection with transaction costs

Le choix de portefeuille optimal d'actifs a été depuis longtemps et continue d'être un sujet d'intérêt majeur dans le domaine de la finance. L'objectif principal étant de trouver la meilleure façon d'allouer les ressources financières dans un ensemble d'actifs disponibles sur le marché financier afin de réduire les risques de fluctuation du portefeuille et d'atteindre des rendements élevés. Néanmoins, la littérature de choix de portefeuille a connu une avancée considérable à partir du 20ieme siècle avec l'apparition de nombreuses stratégies motivées essentiellement par le travail pionnier de Markowitz (1952) qui offre une base solide à l'analyse de portefeuille sur le marché financier. Cette thèse, divisée en trois chapitres, contribue à cette vaste littérature en proposant divers outils économétriques pour améliorer le processus de sélection de portefeuilles sur le marché financier afin d'aider les intervenants de ce marché. Le premier chapitre, qui est un papier joint avec Marine Carrasco, aborde un problème de sélection de portefeuille avec coûts de transaction sur le marché financier. Plus précisément, nous développons une procédure de test simple basée sur une estimation de type GMM pour évaluer l'effet des coûts de transaction dans l'économie, quelle que soit la forme présumée des coûts de transaction dans le modèle. En fait, la plupart des études dans la littérature sur l'effet des coûts de transaction dépendent largement de la forme supposée pour ces frictions dans le modèle comme cela a été montré à travers de nombreuses études (Dumas and Luciano (1991), Lynch and Balduzzi (1999), Lynch and Balduzzi (2000), Liu and Loewenstein (2002), Liu (2004), Lesmond et al. (2004), Buss et al. (2011), Gârleanu and Pedersen (2013), Heaton and Lucas (1996)). Ainsi, pour résoudre ce problème, nous développons une procédure statistique, dont le résultat est indépendant de la forme des coûts de transaction, pour tester la significativité de ces coûts dans le processus d'investissement sur le marché financier. Cette procédure de test repose sur l'hypothèse que le modèle estimé par la méthode des moments généralisés (GMM) est correctement spécifié. Un test commun utilisé pour évaluer cette hypothèse est le J-test proposé par Hansen (1982). Cependant, lorsque le paramètre d'intérêt se trouve au bord de l'espace paramétrique, le J-test standard souffre d'un rejet excessif. De ce fait, nous proposons une procédure en deux étapes pour tester la sur-identification lorsque le paramètre d'intérêt est au bord de l'espace paramétrique. Empiriquement, nous appliquons nos procédures de test à la classe des anomalies utilisées par Novy-Marx and Velikov (2016). Nous montrons que les coûts de transaction ont un effet significatif sur le comportement des investisseurs pour la plupart de ces anomalies. Par conséquent, les investisseurs améliorent considérablement les performances hors échantillon en tenant compte des coûts de transaction dans le processus d'investissement. Le deuxième chapitre aborde un problème dynamique de sélection de portefeuille de grande taille. Avec une fonction d'utilité exponentielle, la solution optimale se révèle être une fonction de l'inverse de la matrice de covariance des rendements des actifs. Cependant, lorsque le nombre d'actifs augmente, cet inverse devient peu fiable, générant ainsi une solution qui s'éloigne du portefeuille optimal avec de mauvaises performances. Nous proposons deux solutions à ce problème. Premièrement, nous pénalisons la norme des poids du portefeuille optimal dans le problème dynamique et montrons que la stratégie sélectionnée est asymptotiquement efficace. Cependant, cette méthode contrôle seulement en partie l'erreur d'estimation dans la solution optimale car elle ignore l'erreur d'estimation du rendement moyen des actifs, qui peut également être importante lorsque le nombre d'actifs sur le marché financier augmente considérablement. Nous proposons une méthode alternative qui consiste à pénaliser la norme de la différence de pondérations successives du portefeuille dans le problème dynamique pour garantir que la composition optimale du portefeuille ne fluctue pas énormément entre les périodes. Nous montrons que, sous des conditions de régularité appropriées, nous maîtrisons mieux l'erreur d'estimation dans le portefeuille optimal avec cette nouvelle procédure. Cette deuxième méthode aide les investisseurs à éviter des coûts de transaction élevés sur le marché financier en sélectionnant des stratégies stables dans le temps. Des simulations ainsi qu'une analyse empirique confirment que nos procédures améliorent considérablement la performance du portefeuille dynamique. Dans le troisième chapitre, nous utilisons différentes techniques de régularisation (ou stabilisation) empruntées à la littérature sur les problèmes inverses pour estimer le portefeuille diversifié tel que définie par Choueifaty (2011). En effet, le portefeuille diversifié dépend du vecteur de volatilité des actifs et de l'inverse de la matrice de covariance du rendement des actifs. En pratique, ces deux quantités doivent être remplacées par leurs contrepartie empirique. Cela génère une erreur d'estimation amplifiée par le fait que la matrice de covariance empirique est proche d'une matrice singulière pour un portefeuille de grande taille, dégradant ainsi les performances du portefeuille sélectionné. Pour résoudre ce problème, nous étudions trois techniques de régularisation, qui sont les plus utilisées : le rigde qui consiste à ajouter une matrice diagonale à la matrice de covariance, la coupure spectrale qui consiste à exclure les vecteurs propres associés aux plus petites valeurs propres, et Landweber Fridman qui est une méthode itérative, pour stabiliser l'inverse de matrice de covariance dans le processus d'estimation du portefeuille diversifié. Ces méthodes de régularisation impliquent un paramètre de régularisation qui doit être choisi. Nous proposons donc une méthode basée sur les données pour sélectionner le paramètre de stabilisation de manière optimale. Les solutions obtenues sont comparées à plusieurs stratégies telles que le portefeuille le plus diversifié, le portefeuille cible, le portefeuille de variance minimale et la stratégie naïve 1 / N à l'aide du ratio de Sharpe dans l'échantillon et hors échantillon.The optimal portfolio selection problem has been and continues to be a subject of interest in finance. The main objective is to find the best way to allocate the financial resources in a set of assets available on the financial market in order to reduce the portfolio fluctuation risks and achieve high returns. Nonetheless, there has been a strong advance in the literature of the optimal allocation of financial resources since the 20th century with the proposal of several strategies for portfolio selection essentially motivated by the pioneering work of Markowitz (1952)which provides a solid basis for portfolio analysis on the financial market. This thesis, divided into three chapters, contributes to this vast literature by proposing various economic tools to improve the process of selecting portfolios on the financial market in order to help stakeholders in this market. The first chapter, a joint paper with Marine Carrasco, addresses a portfolio selection problem with trading costs on stock market. More precisely, we develop a simple GMM-based test procedure to test the significance of trading costs effect in the economy regardless of the form of the transaction cost. In fact, most of the studies in the literature about trading costs effect depend largely on the form of the frictions assumed in the model (Dumas and Luciano (1991), Lynch and Balduzzi (1999), Lynch and Balduzzi (2000), Liu and Loewenstein (2002), Liu (2004), Lesmond et al. (2004), Buss et al. (2011), Gârleanu and Pedersen (2013), Heaton and Lucas (1996)). To overcome this problem, we develop a simple test procedure which allows us to test the significance of trading costs effect on a given asset in the economy without any assumption about the form of these frictions. Our test procedure relies on the assumption that the model estimated by GMM is correctly specified. A common test used to evaluate this assumption is the standard J-test proposed by Hansen (1982). However, when the true parameter is close to the boundary of the parameter space, the standard J-test based on the chi2 critical value suffers from overrejection. To overcome this problem, we propose a two-step procedure to test overidentifying restrictions when the parameter of interest approaches the boundary of the parameter space. In an empirical analysis, we apply our test procedures to the class of anomalies used in Novy-Marx and Velikov (2016). We show that transaction costs have a significant effect on investors' behavior for most anomalies. In that case, investors significantly improve out-of-sample performance by accounting for trading costs. The second chapter addresses a multi-period portfolio selection problem when the number of assets in the financial market is large. Using an exponential utility function, the optimal solution is shown to be a function of the inverse of the covariance matrix of asset returns. Nonetheless, when the number of assets grows, this inverse becomes unreliable, yielding a selected portfolio that is far from the optimal one. We propose two solutions to this problem. First, we penalize the norm of the portfolio weights in the dynamic problem and show that the selected strategy is asymptotically efficient. However, this method partially controls the estimation error in the optimal solution because it ignores the estimation error in the expected return, which may also be important when the number of assets in the financial market increases considerably. We propose an alternative method that consists of penalizing the norm of the difference of successive portfolio weights in the dynamic problem to guarantee that the optimal portfolio composition does not fluctuate widely between periods. We show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that we better control the estimation error in the optimal portfolio with this new procedure. This second method helps investors to avoid high trading costs in the financial market by selecting stable strategies over time. Extensive simulations and empirical results confirm that our procedures considerably improve the performance of the dynamic portfolio. In the third chapter, we use various regularization (or stabilization) techniques borrowed from the literature on inverse problems to estimate the maximum diversification as defined by Choueifaty (2011). In fact, the maximum diversification portfolio depends on the vector of asset volatilities and the inverse of the covariance matrix of assets distribution. In practice, these two quantities need to be replaced by their sample counterparts. This results in estimation error which is amplified by the fact that the sample covariance matrix may be close to a singular matrix in a large financial market, yielding a selected portfolio far from the optimal one with very poor performance. To address this problem, we investigate three regularization techniques, such as the ridge, the spectral cut-off, and the Landweber-Fridman, to stabilize the inverse of the covariance matrix in the investment process. These regularization schemes involve a tuning parameter that needs to be chosen. So, we propose a data-driven method for selecting the tuning parameter in an optimal way. The resulting regularized rules are compared to several strategies such as the most diversified portfolio, the target portfolio, the global minimum variance portfolio, and the naive 1/N strategy in terms of in-sample and out-of-sample Sharpe ratio

Recent developments in empirical IO: dynamic demand and dynamic games

Empirically studying dynamic competition in oligopoly markets requires dealing with large states spaces and tackling difficult computational problems, while handling heterogeneity and multiple equilibria. In this paper, we discuss some of the ways recent work in Industrial Organization has dealt with these challenges. We illustrate problems and proposed solutions using as examples recent work on dynamic demand for differentiated products and on dynamic games of oligopoly competition. Our discussion of dynamic demand focuses on models for storable and durable goods and surveys how researchers have used the "inclusive value" to deal with dimensionality problems and reduce the computational burden. We clarify the assumptions needed for this approach to work, the implications for the treatment of heterogeneity and the different ways it has been used. In our discussion of the econometrics of dynamics games of oligopoly competition, we deal with challenges related to estimation and counterfactual experiments in models with multiple equilibria. We also examine methods for the estimation of models with persistent unobserved heterogeneity in product characteristics, firms’ costs, or local market profitability. Finally, we discuss different approaches to deal with large state spaces in dynamic games.Industrial Organization; Oligopoly competition; Dynamic demand; Dynamic games; Estimation; Counterfactual experiments; Multiple equilibria; Inclusive values; Unobserved heterogeneity.

Recent Developments in Empirical IO: Dynamic Demand and Dynamic Games

Empirically studying dynamic competition in oligopoly markets requires dealing with large states spaces and tackling difficult computational problems, while handling heterogeneity and multiple equilibria. In this paper, we discuss some of the ways recent work in Industrial Organization has dealt with these challenges. We illustrate problems and proposed solutions using as examples recent work on dynamic demand for differentiated products and on dynamic games of oligopoly competition. Our discussion of dynamic demand focuses on models for storable and durable goods and surveys how researchers have used the \Industrial Organization; Oligopoly competition; Dynamic demand; Dynamic games; Estimation; Counterfactual experiments; Multiple equilibria; Inclusive values; Unobserved heterogeneity.

Green transition, investment horizon, and dynamic portfolio decisions

This paper analyzes the implications of investors’ short-term oriented asset holding and portfolio decisions (or short-termism), and its consequences on green investments. We adopt a dynamic portfolio model, which contrary to conventional static mean-variance models, allows us to study optimal portfolios for different decision horizons. Our baseline model contains two assets, one asset with fluctuating returns and another asset with a constant risk-free return. The asset with fluctuating returns can arise from fossil-fuel based sectors or from clean energy related sectors. We consider different drivers of short-termism: the discount rate, the nature of discounting (exponential vs. hyperbolic), and the decision horizon of investors itself. We study first the implications of these determinants of short-termism on the portfolio wealth dynamics of the baseline model. We find that portfolio wealth declines faster with a higher discount rate, with hyperbolic discounting, and with shorter decision horizon. We extend our model to include a portfolio of two assets with fluctuating returns. For both model variants, we explore the cases where innovation efforts are spent on fossil fuel or clean energy sources. Detailing dynamic portfolio decisions in such a way may allow us for better pathways to empirical tests and may provide guidance to some online financial decision making

Business Cycle Implications of Habit Formation

The inability of a wide array of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models to generate fluctuations that resemble actual business cycles has lead to the use of habit formation in consumption. For example, habit formation has been shown to help explain the negative response of labour input to a positive, permanent technology shock, several asset pricing puzzles, and the impact of monetary shocks on real variables. Investigating four different DSGE models with the Bayesian calibration approach, this paper observes that, especially in a new Keynesian monetary business cycle model with both staggered price and wage, habit formation fails to mimic the shape of output growth in the frequency domain: it counterfactually emphasizes low frequency fluctuations in output growth, compared to the U.S. data. On the other hand, habit formation has no clear implications on other business cycle aspects including impulse responses and forecast error variance decompositions of output to permanent and transitory shocks. These observations cast doubt on habit formation as an important ingredient of the DSGE model with a rich set of internal propagation mechanisms.Business Cycle; Habit Formation; Frequency Domain; Bayesian Calibration

The diffusion of externalities from foreign direct investment: theory ahead of measurement

In this paper a structural estimation framework is developed to assess whether inward foreign direct investment (FDI) generates technological externalities. The econometric model is implemented in an empirical investigation with data from Colombia’s Manufacturing Census. So far, evidence of new technological opportunities for host-country firms arising from the operations of multinational corporations (MNCs) has been rather scarce. This is due to serious limitations in the way in which spillovers have been measured. In particular, empirical research has focused almost exclusively on intra-industry externalities while no allowance has been made for inter-industry technological externalities. But, in theory, the optimal location and organizational strategies by a MNC are chosen to minimize the risk of losing profits due to the leakage of technical information to potential competitors. Therefore, the host-country firms within the MNC subsidiary’s sector will tend to experience limited technological gains ensuing FDI, whereas producers in other sectors may benefit, especially if the MNC outsources to local upstream suppliers. While FDI may substitute investment by domestic plants within the MNC subsidiary’s sector, it can complement investment in other sectors. Hence, spillovers from FDI should be primarily inter-industry and not intra-industry. This conjecture is corroborated by testing of the mutisectoral model of FDI spillover diffusion on Colombian manufacturing data. Furthermore, both generic knowhow spillovers and linkage externalities are sizable Keywords; generic technology, inter-industry spillovers, absorptive capacity JEL codes: F21, F23, F43, O41, O34