3,772 research outputs found

    A specialized interior-point algorithm for huge minimum convex cost flows in bipartite networks

    Get PDF
    Research Report UPC-DEIO DR 2018-01. November 2018The computation of the Newton direction is the most time consuming step of interior-point methods. This direction was efficiently computed by a combination of Cholesky factorizations and conjugate gradients in a specialized interior-point method for block-angular structured problems. In this work we apply this algorithmic approach to solve very large instances of minimum cost flows problems in bipartite networks, for convex objective functions with diagonal Hessians (i.e., either linear, quadratic or separable nonlinear objectives). After analyzing the theoretical properties of the interior-point method for this kind of problems, we provide extensive computational experiments with linear and quadratic instances of up to one billion arcs and 200 and five million nodes in each subset of the node partition. For linear and quadratic instances our approach is compared with the barriers algorithms of CPLEX (both standard path-following and homogeneous-self-dual); for linear instances it is also compared with the different algorithms of the state-of-the-art network flow solver LEMON (namely: network simplex, capacity scaling, cost scaling and cycle canceling). The specialized interior-point approach significantly outperformed the other approaches in most of the linear and quadratic transportation instances tested. In particular, it always provided a solution within the time limit and it never exhausted the 192 Gigabytes of memory of the server used for the runs. For assignment problems the network algorithms in LEMON were the most efficient option.Peer ReviewedPreprin

    Dynamic Factorization in Large-Scale Optimization

    Get PDF
    Mathematical Programming, 64, pp. 17-51.Factorization of linear programming (LP) models enables a large portion of the LP tableau to be represented implicitly and generated from the remaining explicit part. Dynamic factorization admits algebraic elements which change in dimension during the course of solution. A unifying mathematical framework for dynamic row factorization is presented with three algorithms which derive from different LP model row structures: generalized upper bound rows, pure network rows,and generalized network TOWS. Each of these structures is a generalization of its predecessors, and each corresponding algorithm exhibits just enough additional richness to accommodate the structure at hand within the unified framework. Implementation and computational results are presented for a variety of real-world models. These results suggest that each of these algorithms is superior to the traditional, non-factorized approach, with the degree of improvement depending upon the size and quality of the row factorization identified

    Interior-point solver for convex separable block-angular problems

    Get PDF
    Constraints matrices with block-angular structures are pervasive in Optimization. Interior-point methods have shown to be competitive for these structured problems by exploiting the linear algebra. One of these approaches solved the normal equations using sparse Cholesky factorizations for the block constraints, and a preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) for the linking constraints. The preconditioner is based on a power series expansion which approximates the inverse of the matrix of the linking constraints system. In this work we present an efficient solver based on this algorithm. Some of its features are: it solves linearly constrained convex separable problems (linear, quadratic or nonlinear); both Newton and second-order predictor-corrector directions can be used, either with the Cholesky+PCG scheme or with a Cholesky factorization of normal equations; the preconditioner may include any number of terms of the power series; for any number of these terms, it estimates the spectral radius of the matrix in the power series (which is instrumental for the quality of the precondi- tioner). The solver has been hooked to SML, a structure-conveying modelling language based on the popular AMPL modeling language. Computational results are reported for some large and/or difficult instances in the literature: (1) multicommodity flow problems; (2) minimum congestion problems; (3) statistical data protection problems using l1 and l2 distances (which are linear and quadratic problems, respectively), and the pseudo-Huber function, a nonlinear approximation to l1 which improves the preconditioner. In the largest instances, of up to 25 millions of variables and 300000 constraints, this approach is from two to three orders of magnitude faster than state-of-the-art linear and quadratic optimization solvers.Preprin

    A specialized interior-point algorithm for huge minimum convex cost flows in bipartite networks

    Get PDF
    © 2020 ElsevierThe computation of the Newton direction is the most time consuming step of interior-point methods. This direction was efficiently computed by a combination of Cholesky factorizations and conjugate gradients in a specialized interior-point method for block-angular structured problems. In this work we refine this algorithmic approach to solve very large instances of minimum cost flows problems in bipartite networks, for convex objective functions with diagonal Hessians (i.e., either linear, quadratic or separable nonlinear objectives). For this class of problems the specialized algorithm only required the solution of a system by conjugate gradients at each interior-point iteration, avoiding Cholesky factorizations. After analyzing the theoretical properties of the interior-point method for this kind of problems, we provide extensive computational experiments with linear and quadratic instances of up to one billion arcs (corresponding to 200 nodes and five million nodes in each subset of the node partition, respectively). For linear and quadratic instances our approach is compared with the barriers algorithms of CPLEX (both standard path-following and homogeneous-self-dual); for linear instances it is also compared with the different algorithms of the state-of-the-art network flow solver LEMON (namely: network simplex, capacity scaling, cost scaling and cycle canceling). The specialized interior-point approach significantly outperformed the other approaches in most of the linear and quadratic transportation instances tested. In particular, it always provided a solution within the time limit; and (like LEMON, and unlike CPLEX) it never exhausted the memory of the server used for the runs. For assignment problems the network algorithms in LEMON were the most efficient option.This work has been supported by the grants MINECO /FEDER MTM2015-65362-R and MCIU/ AEI /FEDER RTI2018-097580-B-I00Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
    corecore