A Parallel Divide-and-Conquer based Evolutionary Algorithm for Large-scale Optimization

Large-scale optimization problems that involve thousands of decision variables have extensively arisen from various industrial areas. As a powerful optimization tool for many real-world applications, evolutionary algorithms (EAs) fail to solve the emerging large-scale problems both effectively and efficiently. In this paper, we propose a novel Divide-and-Conquer (DC) based EA that can not only produce high-quality solution by solving sub-problems separately, but also highly utilizes the power of parallel computing by solving the sub-problems simultaneously. Existing DC-based EAs that were deemed to enjoy the same advantages of the proposed algorithm, are shown to be practically incompatible with the parallel computing scheme, unless some trade-offs are made by compromising the solution quality.Comment: 12 pages, 0 figure

Linear-Time Algorithms for Geometric Graphs with Sublinearly Many Edge Crossings

We provide linear-time algorithms for geometric graphs with sublinearly many crossings. That is, we provide algorithms running in O(n) time on connected geometric graphs having n vertices and k crossings, where k is smaller than n by an iterated logarithmic factor. Specific problems we study include Voronoi diagrams and single-source shortest paths. Our algorithms all run in linear time in the standard comparison-based computational model; hence, we make no assumptions about the distribution or bit complexities of edge weights, nor do we utilize unusual bit-level operations on memory words. Instead, our algorithms are based on a planarization method that "zeroes in" on edge crossings, together with methods for extending planar separator decompositions to geometric graphs with sublinearly many crossings. Incidentally, our planarization algorithm also solves an open computational geometry problem of Chazelle for triangulating a self-intersecting polygonal chain having n segments and k crossings in linear time, for the case when k is sublinear in n by an iterated logarithmic factor.Comment: Expanded version of a paper appearing at the 20th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA09

Self-Improving Algorithms

We investigate ways in which an algorithm can improve its expected performance by fine-tuning itself automatically with respect to an unknown input distribution D. We assume here that D is of product type. More precisely, suppose that we need to process a sequence I_1, I_2, ... of inputs I = (x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) of some fixed length n, where each x_i is drawn independently from some arbitrary, unknown distribution D_i. The goal is to design an algorithm for these inputs so that eventually the expected running time will be optimal for the input distribution D = D_1 * D_2 * ... * D_n. We give such self-improving algorithms for two problems: (i) sorting a sequence of numbers and (ii) computing the Delaunay triangulation of a planar point set. Both algorithms achieve optimal expected limiting complexity. The algorithms begin with a training phase during which they collect information about the input distribution, followed by a stationary regime in which the algorithms settle to their optimized incarnations.Comment: 26 pages, 8 figures, preliminary versions appeared at SODA 2006 and SoCG 2008. Thorough revision to improve the presentation of the pape

A Contribution to Triangulation Algorithms for Simple Polygons

Decomposing simple polygon into simpler components is one of the basic tasks in computational geometry and its applications. The most important simple polygon decomposition is triangulation. The known algorithms for polygon triangulation can be classified into three groups: algorithms based on diagonal inserting, algorithms based on Delaunay triangulation, and the algorithms using Steiner points. The paper briefly explains the most popular algorithms from each group and summarizes the common features of the groups. After that four algorithms based on diagonals insertion are tested: a recursive diagonal inserting algorithm, an ear cutting algorithm, Kong’s Graham scan algorithm, and Seidel’s randomized incremental algorithm. An analysis concerning speed, the quality of the output triangles and the ability to handle holes is done at the end