Towards Efficient Explainability of Schedulability Properties in Real-Time Systems

The notion of efficient explainability was recently introduced in the context of hard-real-time scheduling: a claim that a real-time system is schedulable (i.e., that it will always meet all deadlines during run-time) is defined to be efficiently explainable if there is a proof of such schedulability that can be verified by a polynomial-time algorithm. We further explore this notion by (i) classifying a variety of common schedulability analysis problems according to whether they are efficiently explainable or not; and (ii) developing strategies for dealing with those determined to not be efficiently schedulable, primarily by identifying practically meaningful sub-problems that are efficiently explainable

On the Pitfalls of Resource Augmentation Factors and Utilization Bounds in Real-Time Scheduling

In this paper, we take a careful look at speedup factors, utilization bounds, and capacity augmentation bounds. These three metrics have been widely adopted in real-time scheduling research as the de facto standard theoretical tools for assessing scheduling algorithms and schedulability tests. Despite that, it is not always clear how researchers and designers should interpret or use these metrics. In studying this area, we found a number of surprising results, and related to them, ways in which the metrics may be misinterpreted or misunderstood. In this paper, we provide a perspective on the use of these metrics, guiding researchers on their meaning and interpretation, and helping to avoid pitfalls in their use. Finally, we propose and demonstrate the use of parametric augmentation functions as a means of providing nuanced information that may be more relevant in practical settings

Exact Speedup Factors and Sub-Optimality for Non-Preemptive Scheduling

Fixed priority scheduling is used in many real-time systems; however, both preemptive and non-preemptive variants (FP-P and FP-NP) are known to be sub-optimal when compared to an optimal uniprocessor scheduling algorithm such as preemptive earliest deadline first (EDF-P). In this paper, we investigate the sub-optimality of fixed priority non-preemptive scheduling. Specifically, we derive the exact processor speed-up factor required to guarantee the feasibility under FP-NP (i.e. schedulability assuming an optimal priority assignment) of any task set that is feasible under EDF-P. As a consequence of this work, we also derive a lower bound on the sub-optimality of non-preemptive EDF (EDF-NP). As this lower bound matches a recently published upper bound for the same quantity, it closes the exact sub-optimality for EDF-NP. It is known that neither preemptive, nor non-preemptive fixed priority scheduling dominates the other, in other words, there are task sets that are feasible on a processor of unit speed under FP-P that are not feasible under FP-NP and vice-versa. Hence comparing these two algorithms, there are non-trivial speedup factors in both directions. We derive the exact speed-up factor required to guarantee the FP-NP feasibility of any FP-P feasible task set. Further, we derive the exact speed-up factor required to guarantee FP-P feasibility of any constrained-deadline FP-NP feasible task set

Review of different approaches for optimal performance of multi-processors

We reviewed the literature used for optimal performance of multi-processor, we study different approaches in this paper. They include rate monotonic, deadline monotonic, and Earliest deadline first Algorithm. These approaches are basically used for real time scheduling systems .The problem of inconsistencies occurring in these algorithms such as those tasks whose task period is less but if not executed does not matter and whenever they are scheduled under rate monotonic scheduling algorithm the time consumed by CPU in scheduling the tasks is spent unnecessarily

Mixed-criticality real-time task scheduling with graceful degradation

”The mixed-criticality real-time systems implement functionalities of different degrees of importance (or criticalities) upon a shared platform. In traditional mixed-criticality systems, under a hi mode switch, no guaranteed service is provided to lo-criticality tasks. After a mode switch, only hi-criticality tasks are considered for execution while no guarantee is made to the lo-criticality tasks. However, with careful optimistic design, a certain degree of service guarantee can be provided to lo-criticality tasks upon a mode switch. This concept is broadly known as graceful degradation. Guaranteed graceful degradation provides a better quality of service as well as it utilizes the system resource more efficiently. In this thesis, we study two efficient techniques of graceful degradation. First, we study a mixed-criticality scheduling technique where graceful degradation is provided in the form of minimum cumulative completion rates. We present two easy-to-implement admission-control algorithms to determine which lo-criticality jobs to complete in hi mode. The scheduling is done by following deadline virtualization, and two heuristics are shown for virtual deadline settings. We further study the schedulability analysis and the backward mode switch conditions, which are proposed and proved in (Guo et al., 2018). Next, we present a probabilistic scheduling technique for mixed-criticality tasks on multiprocessor systems where a system-wide permitted failure probability is known. The schedulability conditions are derived along with the processor allocation scheme. The work is extended from (Guo et al., 2015), where the probabilistic model is first introduced for independent task scheduling on a uniprocessor platform. We further consider the failure dependency between tasks while scheduling on multiprocessor platforms. We provide related theoretical analysis to show the correctness of our work. To show the effectiveness of our proposed techniques, we conduct a detailed experimental evaluation under different circumstances”--Abstract, page iii

Adaptive Mid-term and Short-term Scheduling of Mixed-criticality Systems

A mixed-criticality real-time system is a real-time system having multiple tasks classified according to their criticality. Research on mixed-criticality systems started to provide an effective and cost efficient a priori verification process for safety critical systems. The higher the criticality of a task within a system and the more the system should guarantee the required level of service for it. However, such model poses new challenges with respect to scheduling and fault tolerance within real-time systems. Currently, mixed-criticality scheduling protocols severely degrade lower criticality tasks in case of resource shortage to provide the required level of service for the most critical ones. The actual research challenge in this field is to devise robust scheduling protocols to minimise the impact on less critical tasks. This dissertation introduces two approaches, one short-term and the other medium-term, to appropriately allocate computing resources to tasks within mixed-criticality systems both on uniprocessor and multiprocessor systems. The short-term strategy consists of a protocol named Lazy Bailout Protocol (LBP) to schedule mixed-criticality task sets on single core architectures. Scheduling decisions are made about tasks that are active in the ready queue and that have to be dispatched to the CPU. LBP minimises the service degradation for lower criticality tasks by providing to them a background execution during the system idle time. After, I refined LBP with variants that aim to further increase the service level provided for lower criticality tasks. However, this is achieved at an increased cost of either system offline analysis or complexity at runtime. The second approach, named Adaptive Tolerance-based Mixed-criticality Protocol (ATMP), decides at runtime which task has to be allocated to the active cores according to the available resources. ATMP permits to optimise the overall system utility by tuning the system workload in case of shortage of computing capacity at runtime. Unlike the majority of current mixed-criticality approaches, ATMP allows to smoothly degrade also higher criticality tasks to keep allocated lower criticality ones

Precise energy efficient scheduling of mixed-criticality tasks & sustainable mixed-criticality scheduling

In this thesis, the imprecise mixed-criticality model (IMC) is extended to precise scheduling of tasks, and integrated with the dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) technique to enable energy minimization. The challenge in precise scheduling of MC systems is to simultaneously guarantee the timing correctness for all tasks, hi and lo, under both pessimistic and optimistic (less pessimistic) assumptions. To the best of knowledge this is the first work to address the integration of DVFS energy conserving techniques with precise scheduling of lo-tasks of the MC model. In this thesis, the utilization based schedulability tests and sufficient conditions for such systems under Earliest Deadline First EDF-VD scheduling policy are presented. Quantitative study in the forms of speedup bound and approximation ratio are also proved for the unified model. Extensive experimental studies are conducted to verify the theoretical results as well as the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. In safety- critical systems, it is essential to perform schedulability analysis prior to run-time. Parameters characterizing the run-time workload are generated by pessimistic techniques; hence, adopting conservative estimates may result in systems performing much better than anticipated during run-time. This thesis also addresses the following questions associated to the better performance of the task system: (i) How does parameter change affect the schedulability of a task set (system)? (ii) In the event that a mixed-criticality system design is deemed schedulable and specific part/parts of the system are reassigned to be of low-criticality, is the system still safe to run? (iii) If a system is presumed to be non-schedulable, does it invariably benefit to reduce the criticality of some task? To answer these questions, in this thesis, we not only study the property of sustainability with regards to criticality levels, but also revisit sustainability of several uniprocessor and multiprocessor scheduling policies with respect to other parameters --Abstract, page iii