5,896 research outputs found

    Partitioning de Bruijn Graphs into Fixed-Length Cycles for Robot Identification and Tracking

    Full text link
    We propose a new camera-based method of robot identification, tracking and orientation estimation. The system utilises coloured lights mounted in a circle around each robot to create unique colour sequences that are observed by a camera. The number of robots that can be uniquely identified is limited by the number of colours available, qq, the number of lights on each robot, kk, and the number of consecutive lights the camera can see, ℓ\ell. For a given set of parameters, we would like to maximise the number of robots that we can use. We model this as a combinatorial problem and show that it is equivalent to finding the maximum number of disjoint kk-cycles in the de Bruijn graph dB(q,ℓ)\text{dB}(q,\ell). We provide several existence results that give the maximum number of cycles in dB(q,ℓ)\text{dB}(q,\ell) in various cases. For example, we give an optimal solution when k=qℓ−1k=q^{\ell-1}. Another construction yields many cycles in larger de Bruijn graphs using cycles from smaller de Bruijn graphs: if dB(q,ℓ)\text{dB}(q,\ell) can be partitioned into kk-cycles, then dB(q,ℓ)\text{dB}(q,\ell) can be partitioned into tktk-cycles for any divisor tt of kk. The methods used are based on finite field algebra and the combinatorics of words.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publication in Discrete Applied Mathematic

    Algebraic Methods in the Congested Clique

    Full text link
    In this work, we use algebraic methods for studying distance computation and subgraph detection tasks in the congested clique model. Specifically, we adapt parallel matrix multiplication implementations to the congested clique, obtaining an O(n1−2/ω)O(n^{1-2/\omega}) round matrix multiplication algorithm, where ω<2.3728639\omega < 2.3728639 is the exponent of matrix multiplication. In conjunction with known techniques from centralised algorithmics, this gives significant improvements over previous best upper bounds in the congested clique model. The highlight results include: -- triangle and 4-cycle counting in O(n0.158)O(n^{0.158}) rounds, improving upon the O(n1/3)O(n^{1/3}) triangle detection algorithm of Dolev et al. [DISC 2012], -- a (1+o(1))(1 + o(1))-approximation of all-pairs shortest paths in O(n0.158)O(n^{0.158}) rounds, improving upon the O~(n1/2)\tilde{O} (n^{1/2})-round (2+o(1))(2 + o(1))-approximation algorithm of Nanongkai [STOC 2014], and -- computing the girth in O(n0.158)O(n^{0.158}) rounds, which is the first non-trivial solution in this model. In addition, we present a novel constant-round combinatorial algorithm for detecting 4-cycles.Comment: This is work is a merger of arxiv:1412.2109 and arxiv:1412.266

    Embedding large subgraphs into dense graphs

    Full text link
    What conditions ensure that a graph G contains some given spanning subgraph H? The most famous examples of results of this kind are probably Dirac's theorem on Hamilton cycles and Tutte's theorem on perfect matchings. Perfect matchings are generalized by perfect F-packings, where instead of covering all the vertices of G by disjoint edges, we want to cover G by disjoint copies of a (small) graph F. It is unlikely that there is a characterization of all graphs G which contain a perfect F-packing, so as in the case of Dirac's theorem it makes sense to study conditions on the minimum degree of G which guarantee a perfect F-packing. The Regularity lemma of Szemeredi and the Blow-up lemma of Komlos, Sarkozy and Szemeredi have proved to be powerful tools in attacking such problems and quite recently, several long-standing problems and conjectures in the area have been solved using these. In this survey, we give an outline of recent progress (with our main emphasis on F-packings, Hamiltonicity problems and tree embeddings) and describe some of the methods involved

    The Waldschmidt constant for squarefree monomial ideals

    Get PDF
    Given a squarefree monomial ideal I⊆R=k[x1,…,xn]I \subseteq R =k[x_1,\ldots,x_n], we show that α^(I)\widehat\alpha(I), the Waldschmidt constant of II, can be expressed as the optimal solution to a linear program constructed from the primary decomposition of II. By applying results from fractional graph theory, we can then express α^(I)\widehat\alpha(I) in terms of the fractional chromatic number of a hypergraph also constructed from the primary decomposition of II. Moreover, expressing α^(I)\widehat\alpha(I) as the solution to a linear program enables us to prove a Chudnovsky-like lower bound on α^(I)\widehat\alpha(I), thus verifying a conjecture of Cooper-Embree-H\`a-Hoefel for monomial ideals in the squarefree case. As an application, we compute the Waldschmidt constant and the resurgence for some families of squarefree monomial ideals. For example, we determine both constants for unions of general linear subspaces of Pn\mathbb{P}^n with few components compared to nn, and we find the Waldschmidt constant for the Stanley-Reisner ideal of a uniform matroid.Comment: 26 pages. This project was started at the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach (MFO) as part of the mini-workshop "Ideals of Linear Subspaces, Their Symbolic Powers and Waring Problems" held in February 2015. Comments are welcome. Revised version corrects some typos, updates the references, and clarifies some hypotheses. To appear in the Journal of Algebraic Combinatoric

    Ramsey properties of randomly perturbed graphs: cliques and cycles

    Full text link
    Given graphs H1,H2H_1,H_2, a graph GG is (H1,H2)(H_1,H_2)-Ramsey if for every colouring of the edges of GG with red and blue, there is a red copy of H1H_1 or a blue copy of H2H_2. In this paper we investigate Ramsey questions in the setting of randomly perturbed graphs: this is a random graph model introduced by Bohman, Frieze and Martin in which one starts with a dense graph and then adds a given number of random edges to it. The study of Ramsey properties of randomly perturbed graphs was initiated by Krivelevich, Sudakov and Tetali in 2006; they determined how many random edges must be added to a dense graph to ensure the resulting graph is with high probability (K3,Kt)(K_3,K_t)-Ramsey (for t≥3t\ge 3). They also raised the question of generalising this result to pairs of graphs other than (K3,Kt)(K_3,K_t). We make significant progress on this question, giving a precise solution in the case when H1=KsH_1=K_s and H2=KtH_2=K_t where s,t≥5s,t \ge 5. Although we again show that one requires polynomially fewer edges than in the purely random graph, our result shows that the problem in this case is quite different to the (K3,Kt)(K_3,K_t)-Ramsey question. Moreover, we give bounds for the corresponding (K4,Kt)(K_4,K_t)-Ramsey question; together with a construction of Powierski this resolves the (K4,K4)(K_4,K_4)-Ramsey problem. We also give a precise solution to the analogous question in the case when both H1=CsH_1=C_s and H2=CtH_2=C_t are cycles. Additionally we consider the corresponding multicolour problem. Our final result gives another generalisation of the Krivelevich, Sudakov and Tetali result. Specifically, we determine how many random edges must be added to a dense graph to ensure the resulting graph is with high probability (Cs,Kt)(C_s,K_t)-Ramsey (for odd s≥5s\ge 5 and t≥4t\ge 4).Comment: 24 pages + 12-page appendix; v2: cited independent work of Emil Powierski, stated results for cliques in graphs of low positive density separately (Theorem 1.6) for clarity; v3: author accepted manuscript, to appear in CP
    • …
    corecore