721 research outputs found
Godel's Incompleteness Phenomenon - Computationally
We argue that Godel's completeness theorem is equivalent to completability of
consistent theories, and Godel's incompleteness theorem is equivalent to the
fact that this completion is not constructive, in the sense that there are some
consistent and recursively enumerable theories which cannot be extended to any
complete and consistent and recursively enumerable theory. Though any
consistent and decidable theory can be extended to a complete and consistent
and decidable theory. Thus deduction and consistency are not decidable in
logic, and an analogue of Rice's Theorem holds for recursively enumerable
theories: all the non-trivial properties of such theories are undecidable
Decreasing Diagrams for Confluence and Commutation
Like termination, confluence is a central property of rewrite systems. Unlike
for termination, however, there exists no known complexity hierarchy for
confluence. In this paper we investigate whether the decreasing diagrams
technique can be used to obtain such a hierarchy. The decreasing diagrams
technique is one of the strongest and most versatile methods for proving
confluence of abstract rewrite systems. It is complete for countable systems,
and it has many well-known confluence criteria as corollaries.
So what makes decreasing diagrams so powerful? In contrast to other
confluence techniques, decreasing diagrams employ a labelling of the steps with
labels from a well-founded order in order to conclude confluence of the
underlying unlabelled relation. Hence it is natural to ask how the size of the
label set influences the strength of the technique. In particular, what class
of abstract rewrite systems can be proven confluent using decreasing diagrams
restricted to 1 label, 2 labels, 3 labels, and so on? Surprisingly, we find
that two labels suffice for proving confluence for every abstract rewrite
system having the cofinality property, thus in particular for every confluent,
countable system.
Secondly, we show that this result stands in sharp contrast to the situation
for commutation of rewrite relations, where the hierarchy does not collapse.
Thirdly, investigating the possibility of a confluence hierarchy, we
determine the first-order (non-)definability of the notion of confluence and
related properties, using techniques from finite model theory. We find that in
particular Hanf's theorem is fruitful for elegant proofs of undefinability of
properties of abstract rewrite systems
On the Truth of G\"odelian and Rosserian Sentences
There is a longstanding debate in the logico-philosophical community as to
why the G\"odelian sentences of a consistent and sufficiently strong theory are
true. The prevalent argument seems to be something like this: since every one
of the G\"odelian sentences of such a theory is equivalent to the theory's
consistency statement, even provably so inside the theory, the truth of those
sentences follows from the consistency of the theory in question. So,
G\"odelian sentences of consistent theories should be true. In this paper, we
show that G\"odelian sentences of only sound theories are true; and there is a
long road from consistency to soundness, indeed a hierarchy of conditions which
are satisfied by some theories and falsified by others. We also study the truth
of Rosserian sentences and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the
truth of Rosserian (and also G\"odelian) sentences of theories.Comment: 10 page
- …