Online Sorting via Searching and Selection

In this paper, we present a framework based on a simple data structure and parameterized algorithms for the problems of finding items in an unsorted list of linearly ordered items based on their rank (selection) or value (search). As a side-effect of answering these online selection and search queries, we progressively sort the list. Our algorithms are based on Hoare's Quickselect, and are parameterized based on the pivot selection method. For example, if we choose the pivot as the last item in a subinterval, our framework yields algorithms that will answer q<=n unique selection and/or search queries in a total of O(n log q) average time. After q=\Omega(n) queries the list is sorted. Each repeated selection query takes constant time, and each repeated search query takes O(log n) time. The two query types can be interleaved freely. By plugging different pivot selection methods into our framework, these results can, for example, become randomized expected time or deterministic worst-case time. Our methods are easy to implement, and we show they perform well in practice

Worst-Case Efficient Sorting with QuickMergesort

The two most prominent solutions for the sorting problem are Quicksort and Mergesort. While Quicksort is very fast on average, Mergesort additionally gives worst-case guarantees, but needs extra space for a linear number of elements. Worst-case efficient in-place sorting, however, remains a challenge: the standard solution, Heapsort, suffers from a bad cache behavior and is also not overly fast for in-cache instances. In this work we present median-of-medians QuickMergesort (MoMQuickMergesort), a new variant of QuickMergesort, which combines Quicksort with Mergesort allowing the latter to be implemented in place. Our new variant applies the median-of-medians algorithm for selecting pivots in order to circumvent the quadratic worst case. Indeed, we show that it uses at most $n \log n + 1.6n$ comparisons for $n$ large enough. We experimentally confirm the theoretical estimates and show that the new algorithm outperforms Heapsort by far and is only around 10% slower than Introsort (std::sort implementation of stdlibc++), which has a rather poor guarantee for the worst case. We also simulate the worst case, which is only around 10% slower than the average case. In particular, the new algorithm is a natural candidate to replace Heapsort as a worst-case stopper in Introsort

An Efficient Approximate Algorithm for the k-th Selection Problem

We present an efficient randomized algorithm for the approximate k-th selection problem. It works in-place and it is fast and easy to implement. The running time is linear in the length of the input. For a large input set the algorithm returns, with high probability, an element which is very close to the exact k-th element. The quality of the approximation is analyzed theoretically and experimentally

Deterministic Selection on the Mesh and Hypercube

In this paper we present efficient deterministic algorithms for selection on the mesh connected computers (referred to as the mesh from hereon) and the hypercube. Our algorithm on the mesh runs in time O([n/p] log logp + √p logn) where n is the input size and p is the number of processors. The time bound is significantly better than that of the best existing algorithms when n is large. The run time of our algorithm on the hypercube is O ([n/p] log log p + Ts/p log nM/em\u3e), where Ts/p is the time needed to sort p element on a p-node hypercube. In fact, the same algorithm runs on an network in time O([n/p] log log p +Ts/p log), where Ts/p is the time needed for sorting p keys using p processors (assuming that broadcast and prefix computations take time less than or equal to Ts/p

Data structures

We discuss data structures and their methods of analysis. In particular, we treat the unweighted and weighted dictionary problem, self-organizing data structures, persistent data structures, the union-find-split problem, priority queues, the nearest common ancestor problem, the selection and merging problem, and dynamization techniques. The methods of analysis are worst, average and amortized case

Randomized Parallel Selection

We show that selection on an input of size N can be performed on a P-node hypercube (P = N/(log N)) in time O(n/P) with high probability, provided each node can process all the incident edges in one unit of time (this model is called the parallel model and has been assumed by previous researchers (e.g.,[17])). This result is important in view of a lower bound of Plaxton that implies selection takes Ω((N/P)loglog P+log P) time on a P-node hypercube if each node can process only one edge at a time (this model is referred to as the sequential model)

Architecture independent parallel selection with applications to parallel priority queues

AbstractWe present a randomized selection algorithm whose performance is analyzed in an architecture independent way on the bulk-synchronous parallel (BSP) model of computation along with an application of this algorithm to dynamic data structures, namely parallel priority queues. We show that our algorithms improve previous results upon both the communication requirements and the amount of parallel slack required to achieve optimal performance. We also establish that optimality to within small multiplicative constant factors can be achieved for a wide range of parallel machines. While these algorithms are fairly simple themselves, descriptions of their performance in terms of the BSP parameters is somewhat involved; the main reward of quantifying these complications is that it allows transportable software to be written for parallel machines that fit the model