44 research outputs found
Self-Adaptive Methods for PDE
[no abstract available
Goal-oriented error estimation for transient parabolic problems
This work focuses on controlling the error and adapting the discretization in the context of parabolic problems. In order to obtain a sound mathematical framework, the time domain is discretized using a Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) approach. This
allows to formulate the time stepping procedure in a variational format. The error is measured in the basis of an output of interest of the solution, defined by a linear functional. A dual problem, associated with this linear output is introduced.
The dual problem has to be solved backward in time.
An error representation is introduced, based on the weak residual of the primal error applied to the dual solution. Two different alternatives are studied to estimate the error in the dual solution: 1) recovery based error estimators and 2) implicit
residual type estimators. Once the error assessment is performed implicitly in the dual problem, the obtained estimate is plugged into the primal residual to obtain the error in the quantity of interest. The implementation of the estimator
is drastically simplified by using the weak version of the residual instead of the strong version used in previous works.
Thus, the output error is assessed using a mixed technique, explicit for the primal problem and implicit for the dual. In the framework of adaptive computations of transient problems, this approach is very attractive because it allows using first
the implicit scheme for the dual problem and then integrating the primal problem, estimating the error explicitly and eventually adapting the space-time grid. Thus, at every time step of the time marching scheme, the estimate of the dual error is injected into the primal residual (explicit estimate for the primal problem)
Mesh adaptivity driven by goal-oriented locally equilibrated superconvergent patch recovery
[EN] Goal-oriented error estimates (GOEE) have become popular tools to quantify and control the local error in quantities of interest (QoI), which are often more pertinent than local errors in energy for design purposes (e.g. the mean stress or mean displacement in a particular area, the stress intensity factor for fracture problems). These GOEE are one of the key unsolved problems of advanced engineering applications in, for example, the aerospace industry. This work presents a simple recovery-based error estimation technique for QoIs whose main characteristic is the use of an enhanced version of the Superconvergent Patch Recovery (SPR) technique previously used for error estimation in the energy norm. This enhanced SPR technique is used to recover both the primal and dual solutions. It provides a nearly statically admissible stress field that results in accurate estimations of the local contributions to the discretisation error in the QoI and, therefore, in an accurate estimation of this magnitude. This approach leads to a technique with a reasonable computational cost that could easily be implemented into already available finite element codes, or as an independent postprocessing tool.This work was supported by the EPSRC Grant EP/G042705/1 "Increased Reliability for Industrially Relevant Automatic Crack Growth Simulation with the eXtended Finite Element Method". Stephane Bordas also thanks partial funding for his time provided by the European Research Council Starting Independent Research Grant (ERC Stg Grant Agreement No. 279578) "RealTCut Towards real time multiscale simulation of cutting in non-linear materials with applications to surgical simulation and computer guided surgery". This work has received partial support from the research project DPI2010-20542 of the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain). The financial support of the FPU program (AP2008-01086), the funding from Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2012/023) are also acknowledged. All authors also thank the partial support of the Framework Programme 7 Initial Training Network Funding under Grant No. 289361 "Integrating Numerical Simulation and Geometric Design Technology."González Estrada, OA.; Nadal Soriano, E.; RĂłdenas, J.; Kerfriden, P.; Bordas, S.; Fuenmayor Fernández, FJ. (2014). Mesh adaptivity driven by goal-oriented locally equilibrated superconvergent patch recovery. Computational Mechanics. 53(5):957-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0942-8S957976535Ainsworth M, Oden JT (2000) A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis. Wiley, ChichesterBabuška I, Rheinboldt WC (1978) A-posteriori error estimates for the finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 12(10):1597–1615Cottereau R, DĂez P, Huerta A (2009) Strict error bounds for linear solid mechanics problems using a subdomain-based flux-free method. Comput Mech 44(4):533–547Larsson F, Hansbo P, Runesson K (2002) Strategies for computing goal-oriented a posteriori error measures in non-linear elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 55(8):879–894DĂez P, ParĂ©s N, Huerta A (2003) Recovering lower bounds of the error by postprocessing implicit residual a posteriori error estimates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(10):1465–1488VerfĂĽrth R (1996) A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques. Wiley, ChichesterStein E, Ramm E, Rannacher R (2003) Error-controlled adaptive finite elements in solid mechanics. Wiley, ChichesterDĂez P, Egozcue JJ, Huerta A (1998) A posteriori error estimation for standard finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 163(1–4):141–157Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1987) A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineering analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):337–357Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: the recovery technique. Int J Numer Methods Eng 33(7):1331–1364Bordas SPA, Duflot M (2007) Derivative recovery and a posteriori error estimate for extended finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(35–36):3381–3399Bordas SPA, Duflot M, Le P (2008) A simple error estimator for extended finite elements. Commun Numer Methods Eng 24(11):961–971RĂłdenas JJ, González-Estrada OA, TarancĂłn JE, Fuenmayor FJ (2008) A recovery-type error estimator for the extended finite element method based on singular+smooth stress field splitting. Int J Numer Methods Eng 76(4):545–571Duflot M, Bordas SPA (2008) A posteriori error estimation for extended finite elements by an extended global recovery. Int J Numer Methods Eng 76:1123–1138Prange C, Loehnert S, Wriggers P (2012) Error estimation for crack simulations using the XFEM. Int J Numer Methods Eng 91:1459–1474Hild P, Lleras V, Renard Y (2010) A residual error estimator for the XFEM approximation of the elasticity problem. Comput Mech (submitted)González-Estrada O, Natarajan S, RĂłdenas J, Nguyen-Xuan H, Bordas S (2012) Efficient recovery-based error estimation for the smoothed finite element method for smooth and singular linear elasticity. Comput Mech 52(1):37–52González-Estrada O, RĂłdenas J, Bordas S, Duflot M, Kerfriden P, Giner E (2012) On the role of enrichment and statical admissibility of recovered fields in a-posteriori error estimation for enriched finite element methods. Eng Comput 29(8):2–2DĂez P, RĂłdenas JJ, Zienkiewicz OC (2007) Equilibrated patch recovery error estimates: simple and accurate upper bounds of the error. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69(10):2075–2098RĂłdenas JJ, González-Estrada OA, DĂez P, Fuenmayor FJ (2010) Accurate recovery-based upper error bounds for the extended finite element framework. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(37–40):2607–2621Oden JT, Prudhomme S (2001) Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for the finite element method. Comput Math Appl 41(5–6):735–756Ladevèze P (2006) Upper error bounds on calculated outputs of interest for linear and nonlinear structural problems. Comptes Rendus MĂ©canique 334(7):399–407Ladevèze P, Pelle JP (2005) Mastering calculations in linear and nonlinear mechanics. Mechanical engineering series. Springer, BerlinRĂĽter M, Stein E (2006) Goal-oriented a posteriori error estimates in linear elastic fracture mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(4–6):251–278Ladevèze P, Rougeot P, Blanchard P, Moreau JP (1999) Local error estimators for finite element linear analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 176(1–4):231–246de Almeida JPM, Pereira OJBA (2006) Upper bounds of the error in local quantities using equilibrated and compatible finite element solutions for linear elastic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(4–6):279–296Cirak F, Ramm E (1998) A posteriori error estimation and adaptivity for linear elasticity using the reciprocal theorem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 156(1–4):351–362VerfĂĽrth R (1999) A review of a posteriori error estimation techniques for elasticity problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 176:419–440Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor R (2000) The finite element method: the basis, vol 1, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordLadevèze P, Leguillon D (1983) Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and applications. SIAM J Numer Anal 20(3):485–509Pled F, Chamoin L, Ladevèze P (2012) An enhanced method with local energy minimization for the robust a posteriori construction of equilibrated stress fields in finite element analyses. Comput Mech 49(3):357–378Blacker T, Belytschko T (1994) Superconvergent patch recovery with equilibrium and conjoint interpolant enhancements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37(3):517–536González-Estrada OA, Nadal E, RĂłdenas JJ, Kerfriden P, Bordas SPA (2012) Error estimation in quantities of interest for XFEM using recovery techniques. In: Yang ZJ (ed)20th UK National Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering (ACME). The University of Manchester, Manchester, pp 333–336Pannachet T, Sluys LJ, Askes H (2009) Error estimation and adaptivity for discontinuous failure. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78(5):528–563RĂłdenas JJ, Tur M, Fuenmayor FJ, Vercher A (2007) Improvement of the superconvergent patch recovery technique by the use of constraint equations: the SPR-C technique. Int J Numer Methods Eng 70(6):705–727SzabĂł BA, Babuška I (1991) Finite element analysis. Wiley, New YorkGiner E, Tur M, Fuenmayor FJ (2009) A domain integral for the calculation of generalized stress intensity factors in sliding complete contacts. Int J Solids Struct 46(3–4):938–951RĂłdenas JJ (2005) Goal Oriented Adaptivity: Una introducciĂłn a travĂ©s del problema elástico lineal. Technical Report, CIMNE, PI274, Barcelona, SpainGonzález-Estrada OA, RĂłdenas JJ, Nadal E, Bordas SPA, Kerfriden P (2011) Equilibrated patch recovery for accurate evaluation of upper error bounds in quantities of interest. Adaptive Modeling and Simulation. In: Aubry D, DĂez P, Tie B, ParĂ©s N (eds) Proceedings of V ADMOS 2011. CIMNE, ParisVerdugo F, DĂez P, Casadei F (2011) Natural quantities of interest in linear elastodynamics for goal oriented error estimation and adaptivity. Adaptive Modeling and Simulation. In: Aubry D, DĂez P, Tie B, ParĂ©s N (eds) Proceedings of V ADMOS 2011. CIMNE, ParisRĂłdenas JJ, Giner E, TarancĂłn JE, González-Estrada OA (2006) A recovery error estimator for singular problems using singular+smooth field splitting. In: Topping BHV, Montero G, Montenegro R (eds) Fifth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology. Civil-Comp Press, Stirling, ScotlandNadal E, RĂłdenas JJ, TarancĂłn JE, Fuenmayor FJ (2011) On the advantages of the use of cartesan grid solvers in shape optimization problems. Adaptive Modeling and Simulation. In: Aubry D, DĂez P, Tie B, ParĂ©s N (eds) Proceedings of V ADMOS 2011. CIMNE, ParisNadal E, RĂłdenas J, Albelda J, Tur M, Fuenmayor FJ (2013) Efficient Finite Element methodology based on Cartesian Grids. Application to structural shape optimization. Abstr Appl Anal 2013(Article ID 953786):1–19.Moumnassi M, Belouettar S, BĂ©chet E, Bordas SPA, Quoirin D, Potier-Ferry M (2011) Finite element analysis on implicitly defined domains: an accurate representation based on arbitrary parametric surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(5–8):774–796Belytschko T, Parimi C, MoĂ«s N, Sukumar N, Usui S (2003) Structured extended finite element methods for solids defined by implicit surfaces. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(4):609–635MoĂ«s N, Cloirec M, Cartraud P, Remacle JF (2003) A computational approach to handle complex microstructure geometries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(28–30):3163–3177Gordon WJ, Hall CA (1973) Construction of curvilinear co-ordinate systems and applications to mesh generation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 7(4):461–477Sevilla R, Fernández-MĂ©ndez S (2008) NURBS-enhanced finite element method ( NEFEM ). Online 76(1):56–83BĂ©chet E, MoĂ«s N, Wohlmuth B (2009) A stable Lagrange multiplier space for stiff interface conditions within the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78:931–954Schweitzer M (2011) Stable enrichment and local preconditioning in the particle-partition of unity method. Numerische Mathematik 118(1):137–170Menk A, Bordas S (2011) A robust preconditioning technique for the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 85(13):1609–1632Hiriyur B, Tuminaro R, Waisman H, Boman E, Keyes D (2012) A quasi-algebraic multigrid approach to fracture problems based on extended finite elements. SIAM J Sci Comput 34(2):603–626Gerstenberger A, Tuminaro R (2012) An algebraic multigrid approach to solve xfem based fracture problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 94(3):248–272Ladevèze P, Marin P, Pelle JP, Gastine JL (1992) Accuracy and optimal meshes in finite element computation for nearly incompressible materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):303–315Coorevits P, Ladevèze P, Pelle JP (1995) An automatic procedure with a control of accuracy for finite element analysis in 2D elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 121:91–120Li LY, Bettess P (1995) Notes on mesh optimal criteria in adaptive finite element computations. Commun Numer Methods Eng 11(11):911–915Fuenmayor FJ, Oliver JL (1996) Criteria to achieve nearly optimal meshes in the h-adaptive finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:4039–4061Abel JF, Shephard MS (1979) An algorithm for multipoint constraints in finite element analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 14(3):464–467Farhat C, Lacour C, Rixen D (1998) Incorporation of linear multipoint constraints in substructure based iterative solvers. Part 1: a numerically scalable algorithm. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(6):997–1016Bordas SPA, Moran B (2006) Enriched finite elements and level sets for damage tolerance assessment of complex structures. Eng Fract Mech 73(9):1176–1201Bordas S, Conley J, Moran B, Gray J, Nichols E (2007) A simulation-based design paradigm for complex cast components. Eng Comput 23(1):25–37Bordas SPA, Nguyen PV, Dunant C, Guidoum A, Nguyen-Dang H (2007) An extended finite element library. Int J Numer Methods Eng 71(6):703–732Wyart E, Coulon D, Duflot M, Pardoen T, Remacle JF, Lani F (2007) A substructured FE-shell/XFE-3D method for crack analysis in thin-walled structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72(7):757–779Wyart E, Duflot M, Coulon D, Martiny P, Pardoen T, Remacle JF, Lani F (2008) Substructuring FEXFE approaches applied to three-dimensional crack propagation. J Comput Appl Math 215(2):626–63
A posteriori error estimator based on gradient recovery by averaging for discontinuous Galerkin methods
International audienceWe consider some (anisotropic and piecewise constant) diffusion problems in domains of R^2, approximated by a discontinuous Galerkin method with polynomials of any fixed degree. We propose an a posteriori error estimator based on gradient recovery by averaging. It is shown that this estimator gives rise to an upper bound where the constant is one up to some additional terms that guarantee reliability. The lower bound is also established. Moreover these additional terms are negligible when the recovered gradient is super convergent. The reliability and efficiency of the proposed estimator in confirmed by some numerical tests
Scalable Recovery-based Adaptation on Quadtree Meshes for Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems
We propose a mesh adaptation procedure for Cartesian quadtree meshes, to
discretize scalar advection-diffusion-reaction problems. The adaptation process
is driven by a recovery-based a posteriori estimator for the -norm
of the discretization error, based on suitable higher order approximations of
both the solution and the associated gradient. In particular, a metric-based
approach exploits the information furnished by the estimator to iteratively
predict the new adapted mesh. The new mesh adaptation algorithm is successfully
assessed on different configurations, and turns out to perform well also when
dealing with discontinuities in the data as well as in the presence of internal
layers not aligned with the Cartesian directions. A cross-comparison with a
standard estimate--mark--refine approach and with other adaptive strategies
available in the literature shows the remarkable accuracy and parallel
scalability of the proposed approach