A polynomial lower bound for testing monotonicity

We show that every algorithm for testing n-variate Boolean functions for monotonicity has query complexity Ω(n1/4). All previous lower bounds for this problem were designed for nonadaptive algorithms and, as a result, the best previous lower bound for general (possibly adaptive) monotonicity testers was only Ω(logn). Combined with the query complexity of the non-adaptive monotonicity tester of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (FOCS 2015), our lower bound shows that adaptivity can result in at most a quadratic reduction in the query complexity for testing monotonicity. By contrast, we show that there is an exponential gap between the query complexity of adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms for testing regular linear threshold functions (LTFs) for monotonicity. Chen, De, Servedio, and Tan (STOC 2015) recently showed that non-adaptive algorithms require almost Ω(n1/2) queries for this task. We introduce a new adaptive monotonicity testing algorithm which has query complexity O(logn) when the input is a regular LTF

Mildly Exponential Lower Bounds on Tolerant Testers for Monotonicity, Unateness, and Juntas

We give the first super-polynomial (in fact, mildly exponential) lower bounds for tolerant testing (equivalently, distance estimation) of monotonicity, unateness, and juntas with a constant separation between the "yes" and "no" cases. Specifically, we give $\bullet$ A $2^{\Omega(n^{1/4}/\sqrt{\varepsilon})}$-query lower bound for non-adaptive, two-sided tolerant monotonicity testers and unateness testers when the "gap" parameter $\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1$ is equal to $\varepsilon$, for any $\varepsilon \geq 1/\sqrt{n}$; $\bullet$ A $2^{\Omega(k^{1/2})}$-query lower bound for non-adaptive, two-sided tolerant junta testers when the gap parameter is an absolute constant. In the constant-gap regime no non-trivial prior lower bound was known for monotonicity, the best prior lower bound known for unateness was $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{3/2})$ queries, and the best prior lower bound known for juntas was $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ queries.Comment: 20 pages, 1 figur

New Methods in Sublinear Computation for High Dimensional Problems

We study two classes of problems within sublinear algorithms: data structures for approximate nearest neighbor search, and property testing of Boolean functions. We develop algorithmic and analytical tools for proving upper and lower bounds on the complexity of these problems, and obtain the following results: * We give data structures for approximate nearest neighbor search achieving state-of-the-art approximations for various high-dimensional normed spaces. For example, our data structure for normed spaces over R answers queries in sublinear time while using nearly linear space and achieves approximation which is sub-polynomial in the dimension. * We prove query complexity lower bounds for property testing of three fundamental properties: -juntas, monotonicity, and unateness. Our lower bounds for non-adaptive junta testing and adaptive unateness testing are nearly optimal, and the lower bound for adaptive monotonicity testing is the best that is currently known. * We give an algorithm for testing unateness with nearly optimal query complexity. The algorithm is crucially adaptive and based on a novel analysis of binary search over long paths of the hypercube

Isoperimetric Inequalities for Real-Valued Functions with Applications to Monotonicity Testing

We generalize the celebrated isoperimetric inequality of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (SICOMP 2018) for Boolean functions to the case of real-valued functions f:{0,1}^d ? ?. Our main tool in the proof of the generalized inequality is a new Boolean decomposition that represents every real-valued function f over an arbitrary partially ordered domain as a collection of Boolean functions over the same domain, roughly capturing the distance of f to monotonicity and the structure of violations of f to monotonicity. We apply our generalized isoperimetric inequality to improve algorithms for testing monotonicity and approximating the distance to monotonicity for real-valued functions. Our tester for monotonicity has query complexity O?(min(r ?d,d)), where r is the size of the image of the input function. (The best previously known tester makes O(d) queries, as shown by Chakrabarty and Seshadhri (STOC 2013).) Our tester is nonadaptive and has 1-sided error. We prove a matching lower bound for nonadaptive, 1-sided error testers for monotonicity. We also show that the distance to monotonicity of real-valued functions that are ?-far from monotone can be approximated nonadaptively within a factor of O(?{d log d}) with query complexity polynomial in 1/? and the dimension d. This query complexity is known to be nearly optimal for nonadaptive algorithms even for the special case of Boolean functions. (The best previously known distance approximation algorithm for real-valued functions, by Fattal and Ron (TALG 2010) achieves O(d log r)-approximation.

Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) n1/2n^{1/2} non-adaptive queries

We prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{1/2 - c})$, for all $c>0$, on the query complexity of (two-sided error) non-adaptive algorithms for testing whether an $n$-variable Boolean function is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This improves a $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/5})$ lower bound for the same problem that was recently given in [CST14] and is very close to $\Omega(n^{1/2})$, which we conjecture is the optimal lower bound for this model