17 research outputs found

    ์ด์ค‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ „์‚ฐํ™”๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”: ์ธก์ • ๋ณ€์ด์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ธ์ž ํƒ์ƒ‰, ์ธก์ • ๋ณ€์ด์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ž„์ƒ์  ๊ฒ€์ฆ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2019. 2. ๊ตฌ์ง„๋ชจ.์„œ๋ก : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด์ค‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ „์‚ฐํ™”๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜์ˆ ์„(CT) ํ†ตํ•œ ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”์— ์ด์ค‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€ CT ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ, ์˜์ƒ ํš๋“ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์•ก์ฒด ์„ฑ์ƒ์ด ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ธก์ • ๋ณ€์ด์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„(measurement variability)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ž„์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: Part I๊ณผ II์—์„œ๋Š” ์ข…๊ฒฉ๋™ ํŒฌํ…€์„ ์Šค์บ”ํ•˜๊ณ , ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ(iodine density) ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ด์ค‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€ CT ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ์™€ ์˜์ƒ ํš๋“ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ, ์•ก์ฒด ์„ฑ์ƒ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ linear-mixed effect model๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ๋ฐ€๋„์˜ ์ธก์ • ๋ณ€์ด ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Part III์—์„œ๋Š” ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”์˜ ๋ณ€์ด ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์ฐธ์กฐ์˜์ฆ๊ฐ• ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ฐ’์˜(cutoff) ์ž„์ƒ์  ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์Šด์ƒ˜์ข…๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์Šด์ƒ˜ ๋‚ญ์ข…์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์€ ํ™˜์ž-๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ›„ํ–ฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: Part I์—์„œ ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ๋ฐ€๋„์˜ ์ ˆ๋Œ€์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ์ด์ค‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€ CT ์Šค์บ๋„ˆ ๋˜๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด ์„ฑ์ƒ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค(P>0.05). ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ์ฐธ๊ฐ’์ด 0 mg/ml์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ณ€์ด ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” -0.6 mg/ml์—์„œ 0.4 mg/ml์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ฐธ์กฐ์˜์ฆ๊ฐ•์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ฐ’์€ 0.4 mg/ml๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Part II์—์„œ ๊ด€์ „์••๊ณผ(P<0.001) ๊ด€์ „๋ฅ˜(P<0.05๊ตํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ P ๊ฐ’์— ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ)๋Š” ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ์ •๋Ÿ‰๊ฐ’์— ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ทธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ, ์ฆ‰, ํšŒ๊ท€๊ณ„์ˆ˜์˜ ์ ˆ๋Œ€๊ฐ’์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ž‘์•˜๋‹ค. ์š”์˜ค๋“œ๋ฅผ ํฌ์„ํ•œ ์šฉ๋งค์˜ ์„ฑ์ƒ ์—ญ์‹œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ(P=0.007), ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ์•„๋ฏธ๋…ธ์‚ฐ ์šฉ์•ก ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑํ‰๊ท ์˜ ์ฐจ๋Š” โ‰ฅ5 mg/ml์˜ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํŠœ๋ธŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” 0.1์—์„œ 0.3 mg/ml์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, โ‰ค1 mg/ml์˜ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํŠœ๋ธŒ์—์„œ๋Š” -0.4์—์„œ -0.1 mg/ml์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ค‘ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿด ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์€ ์ธก์ •์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค (P=0.647). Part III์—์„œ ์ฐธ์กฐ์˜์ฆ๊ฐ• ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ฐ’์€(0.4 mg/ml) ํ™˜์ž-๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์Šด์ƒ˜์ข…๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์Šด์ƒ˜ ๋‚ญ์ข…์„ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ 100%, ํŠน์ด๋„ 85.7%, ์ •ํ™•๋„ 90.9%, ์–‘์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋ฅ  80.0%, ์Œ์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋ฅ  100%๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก : ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ์ด์ข…์—๋„ˆ์ง€ CT ์ดฌ์˜๊ธฐ๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’์ด๋‹ค. ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” CT ํš๋“ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์œผ๋‚˜, ์ง„๋‹จ์  CT์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ทธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์˜ ์ •๋„๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ฐธ์กฐ์˜์ฆ๊ฐ• ์š”์˜ค๋“œ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ฐ’์€(0.4 mg/ml) ๊ฐ€์Šด์ƒ˜์ข…๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์Šด์ƒ˜ ๋‚ญ์ข…์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์ด๋‹ค.Purpose: To analyze the effect of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scanners, acquisition parameters, and fluid characteristics on iodine quantification and to calculate and validate the measurement variability range induced by those variables. Methods: In Part I and II, experimental studies were performed using four mediastinal iodine phantoms. Phantoms were scanned with three different DECT scanners from major vendors using various acquisition parameters and their effects on the measurement of iodine density (IoD) were investigated using linear mixed-effect models. Measurement variability range of IoD was also calculated. In Part III, diagnostic usefulness of the true enhancement cutoff was retrospectively validated in patients who underwent surgical resections for thymic cysts and thymic epithelial tumors. Results: In Part I, absolute error of IoD was not significantly affected by the DECT systems and kind of solvents (P>0.05). Measurement variability range was from -0.6 to 0.4 mg/ml for the true iodine concentration 0 mg/ml. In Part II, tube voltage (P<0.001) and tube current-time product (P<0.05, depending on the interaction terms) had statistically significant effects on IoD. However, the magnitude of their effects was minimal in the range of diagnostic CT scans. Solvents also had significant effects on IoD (P=0.007). Specifically, the difference of least squares means between water and amino acid solution ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 for tubes with iodine concentrations โ‰ฅ5 mg/ml and from -0.4 to -0.1 mg/ml for tubes with iodine concentrations โ‰ค1 mg/ml. Spectral level was not an affecting factor (P=0.647). In Part III, the true enhancement cutoff for IoD, which was 0.4 mg/ml, exhibited diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 85.7%, 90.9%, 80.0%, and 100%, respectively, for the differentiation of thymic epithelial tumors from thymic cysts. Conclusions: IoD measurement is robust to the DECT scanners from different vendors. IoD is significantly affected by the acquisition parameters, but the magnitude of effects are minimal in the range of diagnostic CT scans. The true enhancement cutoff of 0.4 mg/ml is an accurate parameter for the differentiation of thymic epithelial tumors from thymic cysts.Abstract i Contents iv List of tables and figures v List of Abbreviations vi Introduction 1 Part I. Materials and Methods 4 Part I. Results 14 Part II. Materials and Methods 30 Part II. Results 36 Part III. Materials and Methods 45 Part III. Results 51 Discussion 54 References 65 Abstract in Korean 74Docto

    The radiological investigation of musculoskeletal tumours : chairperson's introduction

    No full text

    Infective/inflammatory disorders

    Get PDF

    Applications of Medical Physics

    Get PDF
    Applications of Medical Physicsโ€ is a Special Issue of Applied Sciences that has collected original research manuscripts describing cutting-edge physics developments in medicine and their translational applications. Reviews providing updates on the latest progresses in this field are also included. The collection includes a total of 20 contributions by authors from 9 different countries, which cover several areas of medical physics, spanning from radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, radiology, dosimetry, radiation protection, and radiobiology

    Case series of breast fillers and how things may go wrong: radiology point of view

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Breast augmentation is a procedure opted by women to overcome sagging breast due to breastfeeding or aging as well as small breast size. Recent years have shown the emergence of a variety of injectable materials on market as breast fillers. These injectable breast fillers have swiftly gained popularity among women, considering the minimal invasiveness of the procedure, nullifying the need for terrifying surgery. Little do they know that the procedure may pose detrimental complications, while visualization of breast parenchyma infiltrated by these fillers is also deemed substandard; posing diagnostic challenges. We present a case series of three patients with prior history of hyaluronic acid and collagen breast injections. REPORT: The first patient is a 37-year-old lady who presented to casualty with worsening shortness of breath, non-productive cough, central chest pain; associated with fever and chills for 2-weeks duration. The second patient is a 34-year-old lady who complained of cough, fever and haemoptysis; associated with shortness of breath for 1-week duration. CT in these cases revealed non thrombotic wedge-shaped peripheral air-space densities. The third patient is a 37โ€yearโ€old female with right breast pain, swelling and redness for 2- weeks duration. Previous collagen breast injection performed 1 year ago had impeded sonographic visualization of the breast parenchyma. MRI breasts showed multiple non- enhancing round and oval shaped lesions exhibiting fat intensity. CONCLUSION: Radiologists should be familiar with the potential risks and hazards as well as limitations of imaging posed by breast fillers such that MRI is required as problem-solving tool

    Characterization of alar ligament on 3.0T MRI: a cross-sectional study in IIUM Medical Centre, Kuantan

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: The main purpose of the study is to compare the normal anatomy of alar ligament on MRI between male and female. The specific objectives are to assess the prevalence of alar ligament visualized on MRI, to describe its characteristics in term of its course, shape and signal homogeneity and to find differences in alar ligament signal intensity between male and female. This study also aims to determine the association between the heights of respondents with alar ligament signal intensity and dimensions. MATERIALS & METHODS: 50 healthy volunteers were studied on 3.0T MR scanner Siemens Magnetom Spectra using 2-mm proton density, T2 and fat-suppression sequences. Alar ligament is depicted in 3 planes and the visualization and variability of the ligament courses, shapes and signal intensity characteristics were determined. The alar ligament dimensions were also measured. RESULTS: Alar ligament was best depicted in coronal plane, followed by sagittal and axial planes. The orientations were laterally ascending in most of the subjects (60%), predominantly oval in shaped (54%) and 67% showed inhomogenous signal. No significant difference of alar ligament signal intensity between male and female respondents. No significant association was found between the heights of the respondents with alar ligament signal intensity and dimensions. CONCLUSION: Employing a 3.0T MR scanner, the alar ligament is best portrayed on coronal plane, followed by sagittal and axial planes. However, tremendous variability of alar ligament as depicted in our data shows that caution needs to be exercised when evaluating alar ligament, especially during circumstances of injury
    corecore